Breast-conserving surgery following neoadjuvant therapy-a systematic review on surgical outcomes

被引:74
作者
Volders, Jose H. [1 ]
Negenborn, Vera L. [2 ]
Spronk, Pauline E. [3 ]
Krekel, Nicole M. A. [2 ]
Schoonmade, Linda J. [4 ]
Meijer, Sybren [1 ]
Rubio, Isabel T. [5 ]
van den Tol, M. Petrousjka [1 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam Med Ctr, Dept Surg Oncol, Boelelaan 1117,Room 7F-020, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Vrije Univ Amsterdam Med Ctr, Dept Plast Reconstruct & Hand Surg, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Dutch Inst Clin Auditing, Leiden, Netherlands
[4] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Med Lib, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] Hosp Univ Vall dHebron, Breast Canc Surg Unit, Breast Canc Ctr, Barcelona, Spain
关键词
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; Breast-conserving therapy; Margins; Cosmetic outcome; Excision volume; Secondary mastectomy; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; NO BOOST TRIAL; CANCER PATIENTS; PREOPERATIVE CHEMOTHERAPY; RE-EXCISION; INTRAOPERATIVE ULTRASOUND; CONSERVATIVE SURGERY; SEED LOCALIZATION; COSMETIC OUTCOMES; EORTC BOOST;
D O I
10.1007/s10549-017-4598-5
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is increasingly used in breast cancer treatment. One of the main goals of NACT is to reduce the extent of local surgery of the breast and axilla. The aim of this study was to determine surgical outcomes for patients receiving breast-conserving therapy (BCT) after NACT, including margin status plus secondary surgeries, excision volumes, and cosmetic outcomes. A systematic review was performed in accordance with PRISMA principles. Pubmed, MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies investigating the results of BCT following NACT. The main study outcomes were margin status, additional local therapies, excision volumes, and cosmetic outcomes. Non-comparative studies on NACT were also included. Exclusion criteria were studies with less than 25 patients, and studies excluding secondary mastectomy patients. Of the 1219 studies screened, 26 studies were deemed eligible for analysis, including data from 5379 patients treated with NACT and 10,110 patients treated without NACT. Included studies showed wide ranges of tumor-involved margins (2-39.8%), secondary surgeries (0-45.4%), and excision volumes (43.2-268 cm(3)) or specimen weight (26.4-233 g) after NACT. Most studies were retrospective, with a high heterogeneity and a high risk of bias. Cosmetic outcomes after NACT were reported in two single-center cohort studies. Both studies showed acceptable cosmetic outcomes. There is currently insufficient evidence to suggest that NACT improves surgical outcomes of BCT. It is imperative that clinical trials include patient outcome measures in order to allow monitoring and meaningful comparison of treatment outcomes in breast cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 12
页数:12
相关论文
共 56 条
  • [21] A Systematic Review of Oncoplastic Breast-Conserving Surgery Current Weaknesses and Future Prospects
    Haloua, Max H.
    Krekel, Nicole M. A.
    Winters, Henri A. H.
    Rietveld, Derek H. F.
    Meijer, Sybren
    Bloemers, Frank W.
    van den Tol, Monique P.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2013, 257 (04) : 609 - 620
  • [22] Long-term objective esthetic outcome after breast-conserving therapy
    Hennigs, Andre
    Hartmann, Benjamin
    Rauch, Geraldine
    Golatta, Michael
    Tabatabai, Patrik
    Domschke, Christoph
    Schott, Sarah
    Schuetz, Florian
    Sohn, Christof
    Heil, Joerg
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2015, 153 (02) : 345 - 351
  • [23] Cosmetic Outcomes and Complications Reported by Patients Having Undergone Breast-Conserving Treatment
    Hill-Kayser, Christine E.
    Vachani, Carolyn
    Hampshire, Margaret K.
    Di Lullo, Gloria A.
    Metz, James M.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2012, 83 (03): : 839 - 844
  • [24] Howick J, 2011, OXFORD 2011 LEVELS E, V1
  • [25] Long-term cosmetic changes after breast-conserving treatment of patients with stage I-II breast cancer and included in the EORTC 'boost versus no boost' trial
    Immink, J. M.
    Putter, H.
    Bartelink, H.
    Cardoso, J. S.
    Cardoso, M. J.
    van der Hulst-Vijgen, M. H. V.
    Noordijk, E. M.
    Poortmans, P. M.
    Rodenhuis, C. C.
    Struikmans, H.
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2012, 23 (10) : 2591 - 2598
  • [26] Patient-reported Quality of Life and Satisfaction With Cosmetic Outcomes After Breast Conservation and Mastectomy With and Without Reconstruction Results of a Survey of Breast Cancer Survivors
    Jagsi, Reshma
    Li, Yun
    Morrow, Monica
    Janz, Nancy
    Alderman, Amy
    Graff, John
    Hamilton, Ann
    Katz, Steven
    Hawley, Sarah
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2015, 261 (06) : 1198 - 1206
  • [27] Radioactive seed localization in breast cancer treatment
    Janssen, N. N. Y.
    Nijkamp, J.
    Alderliesten, T.
    Loo, C. E.
    Rutgers, E. J. T.
    Sonke, J. -J.
    Peeters, M. T. F. D. Vrancken
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2016, 103 (01) : 70 - 80
  • [28] Preoperative chemotherapy for T2 breast cancer is associated with improved surgical outcome
    Karanlik, H.
    Ozgur, I.
    Cabioglu, N.
    Sen, F.
    Erturk, K.
    Kilic, B.
    Onder, S.
    Deniz, M.
    Yavuz, E.
    Aydiner, A.
    [J]. EJSO, 2015, 41 (09): : 1226 - 1233
  • [29] Effect of cosmetic outcome on quality of life after breast cancer surgery
    Kim, M. K.
    Kim, T.
    Moon, H. G.
    Jin, U. S.
    Kim, K.
    Kim, J.
    Lee, J. W.
    Kim, J.
    Lee, E.
    Yoo, T. K.
    Noh, D. -Y.
    Minn, K. W.
    Han, W.
    [J]. EJSO, 2015, 41 (03): : 426 - 432
  • [30] Preoperative Chemotherapy for Operable Breast Cancer Improves Surgical Outcomes in the Community Hospital Setting
    Komenaka, Ian K.
    Hibbard, Michael L.
    Hsu, Chiu-Hsieh
    Low, Boo Ghee
    Salganick, Jason A.
    Bouton, Marcia E.
    Jha, Chandra
    [J]. ONCOLOGIST, 2011, 16 (06) : 752 - 759