Telavancin versus vancomycin for the treatment of complicated skin and skin-structure infections caused by gram-positive organisms

被引:237
作者
Stryjewski, Martin E. [1 ,9 ]
Graham, Donald R. [3 ]
Wilson, Samuel E. [4 ]
O'Riordan, William [5 ]
Young, David [6 ]
Lentnek, Arnold [8 ,10 ]
Ross, Douglas P. [11 ]
Fowler, Vance G. [1 ,2 ]
Hopkins, Alan [7 ]
Friedland, H. David [7 ]
Barriere, Steven L. [7 ]
Kitt, Michael M. [7 ]
Corey, G. Ralph [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Duke Clin Res Inst, Durham, NC USA
[2] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Div Infect Dis, Durham, NC USA
[3] Springfield Clin, Springfield, IL USA
[4] Univ Calif Irvine, Sch Med, Orange, CA 92668 USA
[5] eStudy Site, San Diego, CA USA
[6] Univ Calif San Francisco, San Francisco Gen Hosp, San Francisco, CA USA
[7] Theravance, San Francisco, CA USA
[8] WellStar Hlth Syst, Marietta, GA USA
[9] Ctr Educ Med & Invest Clin, Dept Med, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
[10] Ctr Educ Med & Invest Clin, Div Infect Dis, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
[11] St Marys Hosp, Durban, South Africa
关键词
D O I
10.1086/587896
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background. Telavancin is an investigational, rapidly bactericidal lipoglycopeptide with a multifunctional mechanism of action. Methods. We conducted 2 parallel, randomized, double-blind, active-control, phase 3 studies with a prespecified pooled analysis design. Patients aged >= 18 years who had complicated skin and skin-structure infections caused by suspected or confirmed gram-positive organisms were randomized to receive either telavancin (10 mg/kg intravenously every 24 h) or vancomycin (1 g intravenously every 12 h). Results. A total of 1867 patients were randomized and received >= 1 dose of study medication. In the clinically evaluable population, at 7-14 days after receipt of the last antibiotic dose, success was achieved in 88% and 87% of patients who received telavancin and vancomycin, respectively (95% confidence interval for the difference, -2.1 to 4.6). Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus was isolated at baseline from samples from 579 clinically evaluable patients. Among these patients with methicillin-resistant S. aureus infection, cure rates were 91% among patients who received telavancin and 86% among patients who received vancomycin (95% confidence interval for the difference, -1.1 to 9.3). Microbiologic eradication among patients infected with methicillin-resistant S. aureus was 90% in the telavancin treatment group and 85% in the vancomycin treatment group (95% confidence interval for the difference, -0.9 to 9.8). Therapy was discontinued because of adverse events in 8% and 6% of patients who received telavancin and vancomycin, respectively. Except for mild taste disturbance, nausea, vomiting, and serum creatinine concentration elevation in the telavancin treatment group and pruritus in the vancomycin treatment group, adverse events were similar between groups with regard to type and severity. Conclusions. Telavancin given once daily is at least as effective as vancomycin for the treatment of patients with complicated skin and skin-structure infections, including those infected with methicillin-resistant S. aureus.
引用
收藏
页码:1683 / 1693
页数:11
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2002, MMWR MORB MORTAL WKL, V51, P902
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2002, MMWR MORB MORTAL WKL, V51, P565
[3]   The safety and efficacy of daptomycin for the treatment of complicated skin and skin-structure infections [J].
Arbeit, RD ;
Maki, D ;
Tally, FP ;
Campanaro, E ;
Eisenstein, BI .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2004, 38 (12) :1673-1681
[4]   National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System Report, data summary from January 1992 through June 2004, issued October 2004 [J].
Cardo, D ;
Horan, T ;
Andrus, M ;
Dembinski, M ;
Edwards, J ;
Peavy, G ;
Tolson, J ;
Wagner, D .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL, 2004, 32 (08) :470-485
[5]   The changing epidemiology of Staphylococcus aureus? [J].
Chambers, HF .
EMERGING INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2001, 7 (02) :178-182
[6]   Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus skin infections:: a review of epidemiology, clinical features, management, and prevention [J].
Cohen, Philip R. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2007, 46 (01) :1-11
[7]   Fifteen-year study of the changing epidemiology of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus [J].
Crum, Nancy F. ;
Lee, Rachel U. ;
Thornton, Scott A. ;
Stine, Colin ;
Wallace, Mark R. ;
Barrozo, Chris ;
Keefer-Norris, Ananda ;
Judd, Sharon ;
Russell, Kevin L. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2006, 119 (11) :943-951
[8]   Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus:: An evolutionary, epidemiologic, and therapeutic odyssey [J].
Deresinski, S .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2005, 40 (04) :562-573
[9]   Community-associated strains of methicillin-resistant Staphylococccus aureus as the cause of healthcare-associated infection [J].
Gonzalez, Blanca E. ;
Rueda, Adriana M. ;
Shelburne, Samuel A., III ;
Musher, Daniel M. ;
Hamill, Richard J. ;
Hulten, Kristina G. .
INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2006, 27 (10) :1051-1056
[10]   Emergence and resurgence of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus as a public-health threat [J].
Grundmann, Hajo ;
Aires-de-Sousa, Marta ;
Boyce, John ;
Tiemersma, Edine .
LANCET, 2006, 368 (9538) :874-885