Prostate MRI quality: a critical review of the last 5 years and the role of the PI-QUAL score

被引:33
作者
Giganti, Francesco [1 ,2 ]
Kasivisvanathan, Veeru [2 ,3 ]
Kirkham, Alex [1 ]
Punwani, Shonit [1 ,4 ]
Emberton, Mark [2 ,3 ]
Moore, Caroline M. [2 ,3 ]
Allen, Clare [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Coll London Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Radiol, London, England
[2] UCL, Div Surg & Intervent Sci, London, England
[3] Univ Coll London Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Urol, London, England
[4] UCL, Ctr Med Imaging, London, England
关键词
IMAGE QUALITY; B VALUE; MULTIPARAMETRIC MRI; ENDORECTAL COIL; T; CANCER; SYSTEM; DWI; ACQUISITION; DISTORTION;
D O I
10.1259/bjr.20210415
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
There is increasing interest in the use of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) in the prostate cancer pathway. The European Association of Urology (EAU) and the British Association of Urological Surgeons (BAUS) now advise mpMRI prior to biopsy, and the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) recommendations set out the minimal technical requirements for the acquisition of mpMRI of the prostate. The widespread and swift adoption of this technique has led to variability in image quality. Suboptimal image acquisition reduces the sensitivity and specificity of mpMRI for the detection and staging of clinically significant prostate cancer. This critical review outlines the studies aimed at improving prostate MR quality that have been published over the last 5 years. These span from the use of specific MR sequences, magnets and coils to patient preparation. The rates of adherence of prostate mpMRI to technical standards in different cohorts across the world are also discussed. Finally, we discuss the first standardised scoring system (i.e., Prostate Imaging Quality, PI-QUAL) that has been created to evaluate image quality, although further iterations of this score are expected in the future.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]  
Ahmed HM, 2021, EGYPT J RADIOL NUC M, V552
[2]   National implementation of multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer detection - recommendations from a UK consensus meeting [J].
Appayya, Mrishta Brizmohun ;
Adshead, Jim ;
Ahmed, Hashim U. ;
Allen, Clare ;
Bainbridge, Alan ;
Barrett, Tristan ;
Giganti, Francesco ;
Graham, John ;
Haslam, Phil ;
Johnston, Edward W. ;
Kastner, Christof ;
Kirkham, Alexander P. S. ;
Lipton, Alexandra ;
McNeill, Alan ;
Moniz, Larissa ;
Moore, Caroline M. ;
Nabi, Ghulam ;
Padhani, Anwar R. ;
Parker, Chris ;
Patel, Amit ;
Pursey, Jacqueline ;
Richenberg, Jonathan ;
Staffurth, John ;
van der Meulen, Jan ;
Walls, Darren ;
Punwani, Shonit .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 122 (01) :13-25
[3]   ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012 [J].
Barentsz, Jelle O. ;
Richenberg, Jonathan ;
Clements, Richard ;
Choyke, Peter ;
Verma, Sadhna ;
Villeirs, Geert ;
Rouviere, Olivier ;
Logager, Vibeke ;
Futterer, Jurgen J. .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2012, 22 (04) :746-757
[4]   Certification in reporting multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate: recommendations of a UK consensus meeting [J].
Barrett, Tristan ;
Padhani, Anwar R. ;
Patel, Amit ;
Ahmed, Hashim U. ;
Allen, Clare ;
Bardgett, Harry ;
Belfield, Jane ;
Brizmohun Appayya, Mrishta ;
Harding, Thomas ;
Hoch, Ornella-Shanin ;
Keanie, Julian Y. ;
Liyanage, Sidath H. ;
Papoutsaki, Marianthi-Vasiliki ;
Punwani, Shonit ;
Robinson, Mark J. C. ;
Rajesh, Arumugam ;
Stafurth, John N. ;
Van derMeulen, Jan ;
Richenberg, Jonathan .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 127 (03) :304-306
[5]   Comparison of image quality and patient discomfort in prostate MRI: pelvic phased array coil vs. endorectal coil [J].
Barth, Borna K. ;
Cornelius, Alexander ;
Nanz, Daniel ;
Eberli, Daniel ;
Donati, Olivio F. .
ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2016, 41 (11) :2218-2226
[6]   T2-and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging at 3 T for the detection of prostate cancer with and without endorectal coil: An intraindividual comparison of image quality and diagnostic performance [J].
Baur, Alexander D. J. ;
Daqqaq, Tareef ;
Wagner, Moritz ;
Maxeiner, Andreas ;
Huppertz, Alexander ;
Renz, Diane ;
Hamm, Bernd ;
Fischer, Thomas ;
Durmus, Tahir .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2016, 85 (06) :1075-1084
[7]   Interreader variability in prostate MRI reporting using Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2.1 [J].
Brembilla, Giorgio ;
Dell'Oglio, Paolo ;
Stabile, Armando ;
Damascelli, Anna ;
Brunetti, Lisa ;
Ravelli, Silvia ;
Cristel, Giulia ;
Schiani, Elena ;
Venturini, Elena ;
Grippaldi, Daniele ;
Mendola, Vincenzo ;
Rancoita, Paola Maria Vittoria ;
Esposito, Antonio ;
Briganti, Alberto ;
Montorsi, Francesco ;
Del Maschio, Alessandro ;
De Cobelli, Francesco .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2020, 30 (06) :3383-3392
[8]   Do antispasmodics or rectal enemas improve image quality on multiparametric prostate MRI? An 'Evidence-Based Practice' review of the literature [J].
Brennan, Daniel L. ;
Lazarakis, Smaro ;
Lee, Allan ;
Tan, Teng H. ;
Chin, Kwang Y. ;
Oon, Sheng F. .
ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2021, 46 (06) :2770-2778
[9]   A multicentre assessment of prostate MRI quality and compliance with UK and international standards [J].
Burn, P. R. ;
Freeman, S. J. ;
Andreou, A. ;
Burns-Cox, N. ;
Persad, R. ;
Barrett, T. .
CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2019, 74 (11) :894.e19-894.e25
[10]   Optimising prostate mpMRI: prepare for success [J].
Caglic, I ;
Barrett, T. .
CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2019, 74 (11) :831-840