Macrosomia prediction using ultrasound fetal abdominal circumference of 35 centimeters or more

被引:67
作者
Jazayeri, A
Heffron, JA
Phillips, R
Spellacy, WN
机构
[1] Louisiana State Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Shreveport, LA USA
[2] Univ S Florida, Coll Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Tampa, FL USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0029-7844(98)00520-1
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To determine if birth weights greater than 4000 g can be predicted by ultrasound measurements of abdominal circumferences. Methods: In 1996, 254 newborns delivered at Tampa General Hospital weighed at least 4000 g, 84 of whom had ultrasound examinations within 2 weeks of delivery. Those were compared with 84 neonates with recent ultrasounds who weighed less than 4000 g. Data were abstracted retrospectively from maternal medical records. Results: The best linear predictor of birth weight was ultrasound measurement of abdominal circumference (AC), which had a correlation coefficient of 0.95. An AC measurement of 35 cm or more predicted 93% of macrosomic infants. Among 177 macrosomic infants born vaginally, 23 (13%) had shoulder dystocia. In that group, induction of labor was associated with a greater than three-fold increase in risk of shoulder dystocia (odds ratio [OR] 3.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.4, 8.2; P <.01). Labor augmentation was not associated with increased risk of shoulder dystocia. Conclusion: Abdominal circumference measurements were useful in screening for suspected macrosomia. An AC measurement of 35 cm or more identified more than 90% of macrosomic infants who were at risk for shoulder dystocia. Induction of labor in macrosomic patients increased the risk of shoulder dystocia. (Obstet Gynecol 1999;93:523-6. (C) 1999 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.).
引用
收藏
页码:523 / 526
页数:4
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 1994, ACOG TECHN B, V200
[2]  
ARIAS F, 1987, OBSTET GYNECOL, V70, P101
[3]   ULTRASONIC MEASUREMENT OF FETAL ABDOMEN CIRCUMFERENCE IN ESTIMATION OF FETAL WEIGHT [J].
CAMPBELL, S ;
WILKIN, D .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1975, 82 (09) :689-697
[4]   Sonographic prediction of shoulder dystocia in infants of diabetic mothers [J].
Cohen, B ;
Penning, S ;
Major, C ;
Ansley, D ;
Porto, M ;
Garite, T .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1996, 88 (01) :10-13
[5]  
CUNNINGHAM FG, 1993, WILLIAMS OBSTETRICS
[6]  
DiCianni G, 1996, INT J OBESITY, V20, P445
[7]   ARE LABOR ABNORMALITIES MORE COMMON IN SHOULDER DYSTOCIA [J].
MCFARLAND, M ;
HOD, M ;
PIPER, JM ;
XENAKIS, EMJ ;
LANGER, O .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1995, 173 (04) :1211-1214
[8]   Fetal growth in diabetic pregnancy [J].
Moore, TR .
CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1997, 40 (04) :771-786
[9]  
Petrikovsky BM, 1997, J CLIN ULTRASOUND, V25, P378, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0096(199709)25:7<378::AID-JCU5>3.0.CO
[10]  
2-7