共 50 条
The efficacy and safety of fluticasone/salmeterol compared to fluticasone in children younger than four years of age
被引:15
|作者:
Yoshihara, Shigemi
[1
]
Tsubaki, Toshikazu
[2
]
Ikeda, Masanori
[3
]
Lenney, Warren
[4
,5
]
Tomiak, Richard
[6
]
Hattori, Takako
[6
]
Hashimoto, Kenichi
[7
]
Soutome, Toru
[8
]
Kato, Shihona
[9
]
机构:
[1] Dokkyo Med Univ, Dept Pediat, Soka, Tochigi, Japan
[2] Tsubaki Childrens Clin, Chiba, Japan
[3] Okayama Univ, Grad Sch Med Dent & Pharmaceut Sci, Dept Pediat Acute Med, Okayama, Japan
[4] GSK, Global Med Expert, London, England
[5] Keele Univ, Resp Child Hlth, Keele, Staffs, England
[6] GSK, Global Resp Franchise, London, England
[7] GlaxoSmithKline KK, Resp Med Dev, Tokyo, Japan
[8] GlaxoSmithKline KK, Biomed Data Sci Dept, Tokyo, Japan
[9] GlaxoSmithKline KK, Clin Operat Dept, Tokyo, Japan
关键词:
asthma;
child;
combination therapy;
double-blind;
fluticasone propionate;
randomized;
salbutamol;
salmeterol;
BUDESONIDE INHALATION SUSPENSION;
PERSISTENT ASTHMA;
PRESCHOOL-CHILDREN;
PROPIONATE;
SALMETEROL;
INFANTS;
D O I:
10.1111/pai.13010
中图分类号:
R392 [医学免疫学];
学科分类号:
100102 ;
摘要:
Background Fluticasone propionate 50 mu g/salmeterol xinafoate 25 mu g (FP/SAL) is widely used in adults and children with asthma, but there is sparse information on its use in very young children. Methods This was a randomized, double-blind, multicentre, controlled trial conducted in children aged 8 months to 4 years. During a 2-week run-in period, they all received FP twice daily. At randomization, they commenced FP/SAL or FP twice daily for 8 weeks. All were then given FP/SAL only, in a 16-week open-label study continuation. Medications were inhaled through an AeroChamber Plus with attached face mask. The primary end-point was mean change in total asthma symptom scores from baseline to the last 7 days of the double-blind period. Analyses were undertaken in all children randomized to treatment and who received at least one dose of study medication. Results Three hundred children were randomized 1:1 to receive FP/SAL or FP. Mean change from baseline in total asthma symptom scores was -3.97 for FP/SAL and -3.01 with FP. The between-group difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.21; 95% confidence interval: -2.47, 0.54). No new safety signals were seen with FP/SAL. Conclusion This is the first randomized, double-blind study of this size to evaluate FP/SAL in very young children with asthma. FP/SAL did not show superior efficacy to FP; no clear add-on effect of SAL was demonstrated. No clinically significant differences in safety were noted with FP/SAL usage.
引用
收藏
页码:195 / 203
页数:9
相关论文