The efficacy and safety of fluticasone/salmeterol compared to fluticasone in children younger than four years of age

被引:15
|
作者
Yoshihara, Shigemi [1 ]
Tsubaki, Toshikazu [2 ]
Ikeda, Masanori [3 ]
Lenney, Warren [4 ,5 ]
Tomiak, Richard [6 ]
Hattori, Takako [6 ]
Hashimoto, Kenichi [7 ]
Soutome, Toru [8 ]
Kato, Shihona [9 ]
机构
[1] Dokkyo Med Univ, Dept Pediat, Soka, Tochigi, Japan
[2] Tsubaki Childrens Clin, Chiba, Japan
[3] Okayama Univ, Grad Sch Med Dent & Pharmaceut Sci, Dept Pediat Acute Med, Okayama, Japan
[4] GSK, Global Med Expert, London, England
[5] Keele Univ, Resp Child Hlth, Keele, Staffs, England
[6] GSK, Global Resp Franchise, London, England
[7] GlaxoSmithKline KK, Resp Med Dev, Tokyo, Japan
[8] GlaxoSmithKline KK, Biomed Data Sci Dept, Tokyo, Japan
[9] GlaxoSmithKline KK, Clin Operat Dept, Tokyo, Japan
关键词
asthma; child; combination therapy; double-blind; fluticasone propionate; randomized; salbutamol; salmeterol; BUDESONIDE INHALATION SUSPENSION; PERSISTENT ASTHMA; PRESCHOOL-CHILDREN; PROPIONATE; SALMETEROL; INFANTS;
D O I
10.1111/pai.13010
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background Fluticasone propionate 50 mu g/salmeterol xinafoate 25 mu g (FP/SAL) is widely used in adults and children with asthma, but there is sparse information on its use in very young children. Methods This was a randomized, double-blind, multicentre, controlled trial conducted in children aged 8 months to 4 years. During a 2-week run-in period, they all received FP twice daily. At randomization, they commenced FP/SAL or FP twice daily for 8 weeks. All were then given FP/SAL only, in a 16-week open-label study continuation. Medications were inhaled through an AeroChamber Plus with attached face mask. The primary end-point was mean change in total asthma symptom scores from baseline to the last 7 days of the double-blind period. Analyses were undertaken in all children randomized to treatment and who received at least one dose of study medication. Results Three hundred children were randomized 1:1 to receive FP/SAL or FP. Mean change from baseline in total asthma symptom scores was -3.97 for FP/SAL and -3.01 with FP. The between-group difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.21; 95% confidence interval: -2.47, 0.54). No new safety signals were seen with FP/SAL. Conclusion This is the first randomized, double-blind study of this size to evaluate FP/SAL in very young children with asthma. FP/SAL did not show superior efficacy to FP; no clear add-on effect of SAL was demonstrated. No clinically significant differences in safety were noted with FP/SAL usage.
引用
收藏
页码:195 / 203
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Salmeterol/fluticasone propionate vs. double dose fluticasone propionate on lung function and asthma control in children
    de Blic, Jacques
    Ogorodova, Ludmila
    Klink, Rabih
    Sidorenko, Irina
    Valiulis, Arunas
    Hofman, Jerzy
    Bennedbaek, Olav
    Anderton, Sally
    Attali, Valerie
    Desfougeres, Jean-Luc
    Poterre, Marc
    PEDIATRIC ALLERGY AND IMMUNOLOGY, 2009, 20 (08) : 763 - 771
  • [22] Efficacy and safety of fluticasone and formoterol in a single pressurized metered dose inhaler
    Bodzenta-Lukaszyk, Anna
    Pulka, Grazyna
    Dymek, Andrzej
    Bumbacea, Dragos
    McIver, Tammy
    Schwab, Birgit
    Mansikka, Heikki
    RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 2011, 105 (05) : 674 - 682
  • [23] Efficacy and Safety of Salmeterol/fluticasone Combination Therapy in Infants and Preschool Children with Asthma Insufficiently Controlled by Inhaled Corticosteroids
    Yoshihara, S.
    Fukuda, H.
    Tamura, M.
    Arisaka, O.
    Ikeda, M.
    Fukuda, N.
    Tsuji, T.
    Hasegawa, S.
    Kanno, N.
    Teraoka, M.
    Wakiguchi, H.
    Aoki, Y.
    Igarashi, H.
    Terada, A.
    Hasegawa, M.
    Manki, A.
    DRUG RESEARCH, 2016, 66 (07) : 371 - 376
  • [24] Efficacy and safety of fluticasone propionate/salmeterol HFA 134A MDI in patients with mild-to-moderate persistent asthma
    Pearlman, DS
    Peden, D
    Condemi, JJ
    Weinstein, S
    White, M
    Baitinger, L
    Scott, C
    Ho, SY
    House, K
    Dorinsky, P
    JOURNAL OF ASTHMA, 2004, 41 (08) : 797 - 806
  • [25] Plume characteristics of fluticasone propionate/formoterol pMDI compared with fluticasone propionate/salmeterol pMDI
    Johal, Baljinder
    Murphy, Seamus
    Marshall, Jonathan
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2013, 42
  • [26] A 6-month safety and efficacy study of fluticasone propionate and fluticasone propionate/salmeterol multidose dry powder inhalers in persistent asthma
    Mansfield, Lyndon
    Yiu, Gloria
    Sakov, Anat
    Liu, Siyu
    Caracta, Cynthia
    ALLERGY AND ASTHMA PROCEEDINGS, 2017, 38 (04) : 264 - 276
  • [27] Efficacy and safety of the combination fluticasone propionate plus salmeterol in asthmatic preschoolers: An observational study
    Hatziagorou, Elpis
    Kouroukli, Eleana
    Galogavrou, Maria
    Papanikolaou, Dafni
    Terzi, Despoina
    Anagnostopoulou, Pinelopi
    Kirvassili, Fotios
    Panagiotakos, Demosthenes B.
    Tsanakas, John
    JOURNAL OF ASTHMA, 2019, 56 (06) : 573 - 580
  • [28] Managing moderate-to-severe paediatric asthma: a scoping review of the efficacy and safety of fluticasone propionate/salmeterol
    Pitrez, Paulo Marcio
    Nanthapisal, Sira
    Castro, Ana Paula Beltran Moschione
    Teli, Chirag
    Abhijith, P. G.
    BMJ OPEN RESPIRATORY RESEARCH, 2023, 10 (01)
  • [29] Improved refill persistence with fluticasone propionate and salmeterol in a single inhaler compared with other controller therapies
    Stoloff, SW
    Stempel, DA
    Meyer, J
    Stanford, RH
    Rosenzweig, JRC
    JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2004, 113 (02) : 245 - 251
  • [30] Comparable spirometric efficacy of tiotropium compared with salmeterol plus fluticasone in patients with COPD: A pilot study
    Bateman, E. D.
    van Dyk, M.
    Sagriotis, A.
    PULMONARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2008, 21 (01) : 20 - 25