Clinical utility and validity of the Functional Disability Inventory among a multicenter sample of youth with chronic pain

被引:260
|
作者
Kashikar-Zuck, Susmita [1 ,2 ]
Flowers, Stacy R. [1 ,2 ]
Claar, Robyn Lewis [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Guite, Jessica W. [6 ,7 ]
Logan, Deirdre E. [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Lynch-Jordan, Anne M. [1 ,2 ]
Palermo, Tonya M. [8 ,9 ,10 ]
Wilson, Anna C. [11 ,12 ]
机构
[1] Cincinnati Childrens Hosp Med Ctr, Div Behav Med & Clin Psychol, Dept Pediat, Cincinnati, OH 45229 USA
[2] Univ Cincinnati, Coll Med, Cincinnati, OH USA
[3] Childrens Hosp, Dept Psychiat, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Childrens Hosp, Div Pain Med, Dept Anesthesiol Perioperat & Pain Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[5] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA USA
[6] Childrens Hosp Philadelphia, Dept Anesthesiol & Crit Care Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[7] Univ Penn, Sch Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[8] Univ Washington, Sch Med, Dept Anesthesiol, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[9] Univ Washington, Sch Med, Dept Pediat, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[10] Univ Washington, Sch Med, Dept Psychiat, Seattle, WA USA
[11] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Dept Pediat, Portland, OR 97201 USA
[12] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Dept Anesthesiol & Perioperat Med, Portland, OR 97201 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Functional disability; Pediatric chronic pain; Clinical utility of FDI; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; PEDIATRIC PAIN; SELF-REPORT; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; JUVENILE FIBROMYALGIA; CHILDREN; ADOLESCENTS; INTENSITY; SCALE; QUESTIONNAIRE;
D O I
10.1016/j.pain.2011.02.050
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
The Functional Disability Inventory (FDI) is a well-established and commonly used measure of physical functioning and disability in youth with chronic pain. Further validation of the measure has been called for, in particular, examination of the clinical utility and factor structure of the measure. To address this need, we utilized a large multicenter dataset of pediatric patients with chronic pain who had completed the FDI and other measures assessing pain and emotional functioning. Clinical reference points to allow for interpretation of raw scores were developed to enhance clinical utility of the measure, and exploratory factor analysis was performed to examine its factor structure. Participants included 1300 youth ages 8 to 18 years (mean = 14.2 years; 76% female) with chronic pain. Examination of the distribution of FDI scores and validation with measures of depressive symptoms and pain intensity yielded 3 distinct categories of disability: No/Minimal Disability, Moderate Disability, and Severe Disability. Factor analysis of FDI scores revealed a 2-factor solution representing vigorous Physical Activities and non-physically strenuous Daily Activities. The 3-level classification system and factor structure were further explored via comparison across the 4 most commonly encountered pain conditions in clinical settings (head, back, abdominal, and widespread pain). Our findings provide important new information regarding the clinical utility and validity of the FDI. This will greatly enhance the interpretability of scores for research and clinical use in a wide range of pediatric pain conditions. In particular, these findings will facilitate use of the FDI as an outcome measure in future clinical trials. (C) 2011 International Association for the Study of Pain. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1600 / 1607
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Validity and clinical utility of the obsessive compulsive inventory-child version: further evaluation in clinical samples
    Aspvall, Kristina
    Cervin, Matti
    Andren, Per
    Perrin, Sean
    Mataix-Cols, David
    Andersson, Erik
    BMC PSYCHIATRY, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [32] Reliability and validity of the Child Pain Anxiety Symptoms Scale (CPASS) in a clinical sample of children and adolescents with acute postsurgical pain
    Page, M. Gabrielle
    Campbell, Fiona
    Isaac, Lisa
    Stinson, Jennifer
    Martin-Pichora, Andrea L.
    Katz, Joel
    PAIN, 2011, 152 (09) : 1958 - 1965
  • [33] A Pilot Study Investigating the Role of Gender in the Intergenerational Relationships between Gene Expression, Chronic Pain, and Adverse Childhood Experiences in a Clinical Sample of Youth with Chronic Pain
    Christensen, Jennaya
    Beveridge, Jaimie K.
    Wang, Melinda
    Orr, Serena L.
    Noel, Melanie
    Mychasiuk, Richelle
    EPIGENOMES, 2021, 5 (02)
  • [34] Development and validation of a functional disability index for chronic low back pain
    Duruoz, Mehmet Tuncay
    Ozcan, Emel
    Ketenci, Aysegul
    Karan, Ayse
    JOURNAL OF BACK AND MUSCULOSKELETAL REHABILITATION, 2013, 26 (01) : 45 - 54
  • [35] The Longitudinal Impact of Parent Distress and Behavior on Functional Outcomes Among Youth With Chronic Pain
    Chow, Erika T.
    Otis, John D.
    Simons, Laura E.
    JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2016, 17 (06): : 729 - 738
  • [36] Clinical Utility of CAT Administered PROMIS Measures to Track Change for Pediatric Chronic Pain
    Bhandari, Rashmi P.
    Harrison, Lauren E.
    Richardson, Patricia A.
    Arce, Ana B. Goya
    You, Dokyoung S.
    Rajagopalan, Adithi
    Birnie, Kathryn A.
    Sil, Soumitri
    JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2022, 23 (01): : 55 - 64
  • [37] Chronic pain and pain-related disability across psychiatric disorders in a clinical adolescent sample
    Wenche L Mangerud
    Ottar Bjerkeset
    Stian Lydersen
    Marit S Indredavik
    BMC Psychiatry, 13
  • [38] Sleep among Youth with Severely Disabling Chronic Pain: Before, during, and after Inpatient Intensive Interdisciplinary Pain Treatment
    Krietsch, Kendra N.
    Beebe, Dean W.
    King, Christopher
    Homan, Kendra J.
    Williams, Sara E.
    CHILDREN-BASEL, 2021, 8 (01):
  • [39] Effect of Kinesio Taping on Pain and Functional Disability in Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Al-Shareef, Amal T.
    Omar, Mohammed T. A.
    Ibrahim, Amal H. M.
    SPINE, 2016, 41 (14) : E821 - E828
  • [40] Further validation of the Chronic Pain Values Inventory in a Swedish chronic pain sample
    Akerblom, Sophia
    Perrin, Sean
    Fischer, Marcelo Rivano
    McCracken, Lance M.
    JOURNAL OF CONTEXTUAL BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE, 2017, 6 (03) : 261 - 267