Clinical outcome and prognostic factors for patients treated within the context of a phase I study: the Royal Marsden Hospital experience

被引:155
作者
Arkenau, H-T [1 ,2 ]
Olmos, D. [1 ,2 ]
Ang, J. E. [1 ,2 ]
de Bono, J. [1 ,2 ]
Judson, I. [1 ,2 ]
Kaye, S. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Royal Marsden Hosp, Drug Dev Unit, Sutton SM2 5PT, Surrey, England
[2] Inst Canc Res, Sutton SM2 5PT, Surrey, England
关键词
phase I trial; outcome; survival; prognostic factors;
D O I
10.1038/sj.bjc.6604218
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The main aim of phase I trials is to evaluate the tolerability and pharmacology of a new compound. However, investigating the potential for clinical benefit is also a key objective. Our phase I trial portfolio incorporates a range of new drugs, including molecular targeted agents, sometimes given together with cytotoxic agents. We performed this analysis of response rate, progression- free ( PFS) and overall survival ( OS) to assess the extent of clinical benefit rate ( CBR: partial response ( PR) + stable disease ( SD)) derived from current trials. We analysed 212 consecutive patients who were treated in 29 phase I studies, from January 2005 to June 2006. All patients had progression of disease prior to study entry. The median age was 58 years ( range: 18 - 86) with a male/ female ratio of 2 : 1. A total of 148 patients ( 70%) were treated in ' first in human trials' involving biological agents ( 132 patients) or new cytotoxic compounds ( 16 patients) alone, and 64 patients ( 30%) received chemotherapy- based regimens with or without biological agents. After a median follow- up time of 34 weeks, the median PFS and OS were 11 and 43 weeks, respectively. The CBR was 53% ( 9% PR and 44% SD) after the first tumour evaluation after two cycles ( between weeks 6 and 8) and has been maintained at 36 and 26% at 3 and 6 months, respectively. Treatment related deaths occurred in 0.47% of our patients and treatment had to be withdrawn in 11.8% of patients due to toxicity. A multivariate analysis ( MVA) of 13 factors indicated that low albumin ( < 35 gl(-1)), lactate dehydrogenase > upper normal limit and > 2 sites of metastasis were independent negative prognostic factors for OS. A risk score based on the MVA revealed that patients with a score of 2 - 3 had a significantly shorter OS compared to patients with a score of 0 - 1 ( 24.9 weeks, 95% Cl 19.5 - 30.2 vs 74.1 weeks, 95% CI 53.2 - 96.2). This analysis shows that a significant number of patients who develop disease progression while receiving standard therapy derived benefit from participation in phase I trials. Risk scoring based on objective clinical parameters indicated that patients with a high score had a significantly shorter OS, and this may help in the process of patient selection for phase I trial entry.
引用
收藏
页码:1029 / 1033
页数:5
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]   Multivariable analysis of prognostic factors for toxicity and survival for patients enrolled in phase I clinical trials [J].
Bachelot, T ;
Ray-Coquard, I ;
Catimel, G ;
Ardiet, C ;
Guastalla, JP ;
Dumortier, A ;
Chauvin, F ;
Droz, JP ;
Philip, T ;
Clavel, M .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2000, 11 (02) :151-156
[2]   Eligibility and response guidelines for phase II clinical trials in androgen-independent prostate cancer: Recommendations from the prostate-specific antigen working group [J].
Bubley, GJ ;
Carducci, M ;
Dahut, W ;
Dawson, N ;
Daliani, D ;
Eisenberger, M ;
Figg, WD ;
Freidlin, B ;
Halabi, S ;
Hudes, G ;
Hussain, M ;
Kaplan, R ;
Myers, C ;
Oh, W ;
Petrylak, DP ;
Reed, E ;
Roth, B ;
Sartor, O ;
Scher, H ;
Simons, J ;
Sinibaldi, V ;
Small, EJ ;
Smith, MR ;
Trump, DL ;
Vollmer, R ;
Wilding, G .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1999, 17 (11) :3461-3467
[3]  
COX DR, 1972, J R STAT SOC B, V34, P187
[4]   Comparison of prognostic factors in patients in phase I trials of cytotoxic drugs vs new noncytotoxic agents [J].
Han, C ;
Braybrooke, JP ;
Deplanque, G ;
Taylor, M ;
Mackintosh, D ;
Kaur, K ;
Samouri, K ;
Ganesan, TS ;
Harris, AL ;
Talbot, DC .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2003, 89 (07) :1166-1171
[5]   Risks and benefits of phase 1 oncology trials, 1991 through 2002 [J].
Horstmann, E ;
McCabe, MS ;
Grochow, L ;
Yamamoto, S ;
Rubinstein, L ;
Budd, T ;
Shoemaker, D ;
Emanuel, EJ ;
Grady, C .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2005, 352 (09) :895-904
[6]   NONPARAMETRIC-ESTIMATION FROM INCOMPLETE OBSERVATIONS [J].
KAPLAN, EL ;
MEIER, P .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1958, 53 (282) :457-481
[7]   Prognostic factors among cancer patients with good performance status screened for phase I trials [J].
Penel, Nicolas ;
Vanseymortier, Marie ;
Bonneterre, Marie-Edith ;
Clisant, Stephanie ;
Dansin, Eric ;
Vendel, Yvette ;
Beuscart, Regis ;
Bonneterre, Jacques .
INVESTIGATIONAL NEW DRUGS, 2008, 26 (01) :53-58
[8]   Trends in the risks and benefits to patients with cancer participating in phase 1 clinical trials [J].
Roberts, TG ;
Goulart, BH ;
Squitieri, L ;
Stallings, SC ;
Halpern, EF ;
Chabner, BA ;
Gazelle, GS ;
Finkelstein, SN ;
Clark, JW .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2004, 292 (17) :2130-2140
[9]   Relationship between objective responses in phase I trials and potential efficacy of non-specific cytotoxic investigational new drugs [J].
Sekine, I ;
Yamamoto, N ;
Kunitoh, H ;
Ohe, Y ;
Tamura, T ;
Kodama, T ;
Saijo, N .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2002, 13 (08) :1300-1306
[10]  
Therasse P, 2000, J NATL CANCER I, V92, P205, DOI 10.1093/jnci/92.3.205