Mobilizing mini-publics: The causal impact of deliberation on civic engagement using panel data

被引:12
作者
Boulianne, Shelley [1 ]
Chen, Kaiping [2 ]
Kahane, David [3 ]
机构
[1] MacEwan Univ, Dept Sociol, Room 6-398,City Ctr Campus,10700 104 Ave, Edmonton, AB T5J 4S2, Canada
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Life Sci Commun, Madison, WI USA
[3] Univ Alberta, Polit Sci, Edmonton, AB, Canada
关键词
civic engagement; deliberative democracy; longitudinal; political interest; political knowledge; PARTICIPATION; MEMBERS; TRUST;
D O I
10.1177/0263395720902982
中图分类号
D81 [国际关系];
学科分类号
030207 ;
摘要
Deliberative exercises may reinvigorate civic life by building citizens' capacity to engage in other types of civic activities. This study examines members of a citizens' panel (n=56) who participated in a 6-day deliberative event on climate change and energy transition in Edmonton, Alberta (Canada), in 2012. We compared panellists' civic engagement, political interest, and political knowledge with those of the general population using a concurrent random digit dialling survey conducted 2.5years after the event (n=405). Panellists are more likely to talk about politics, and volunteer in the community compared to their counterparts in the larger population. Examining three points in time, we reveal a trajectory of increasing political knowledge and civic engagement. Finally, we examine the mechanisms that mobilize panellists into greater civic engagement. This study illustrates how deliberative events could strengthen engagement in civic and political life, depending on the degree to which deliberation was perceived to have occurred.
引用
收藏
页码:460 / 476
页数:17
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1998, DELIBERATIVE DEMOCRA
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2007, EXPLAINING BEHAV MOR
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2011, National Income and Expenditure Accounts: Data Tables, Second Quarter 2011
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2009, TALKING TOGER PUBLIC, DOI DOI 10.7208/CHICAGO/9780226389899.001.0001
[5]   Antecedents of internal political efficacy incidental news exposure online and the mediating role of political discussion [J].
Ardevol-Abreu, Alberto ;
Diehl, Trevor ;
Gil de Zuniga, Homero .
POLITICS, 2019, 39 (01) :82-100
[6]  
Barber B., 1984, Strong democracy: Participatory politics for a new age
[7]   Sustainable Consumers and the State: Exploring How Citizens' Trust and Distrust in Institutions Spur Political Consumption [J].
Berlin, Daniel .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY & PLANNING, 2011, 13 (03) :277-295
[8]  
Bohman John., 1996, Public Deliberation
[9]  
Boulianne S, 2018, PUBLIC DELIBERATION ON CLIMATE CHANGE: LESSONS FROM ALBERTA CLIMATE DIALOGUE, P109
[10]   Building Faith in Democracy: Deliberative Events, Political Trust and Efficacy [J].
Boulianne, Shelley .
POLITICAL STUDIES, 2019, 67 (01) :4-30