Construct Validity of the Five Factor Borderline Inventory

被引:27
作者
DeShong, Hilary L. [1 ]
Lengel, Gregory J. [1 ]
Sauer-Zavala, Shannon E. [2 ]
O'Meara, Madison [1 ]
Mullins-Sweatt, Stephanie N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Oklahoma State Univ, Stillwater, OK 74078 USA
[2] Boston Univ, Boston, MA 02215 USA
关键词
five factor model; borderline personality disorder; assessment; maladaptive variants; nonsuicidal self-injury; PERSONALITY-DISORDER FEATURES; NONSUICIDAL SELF-INJURY; NONCLINICAL YOUNG-ADULTS; 5-FACTOR MODEL; DIMENSIONAL STRUCTURE; CONCURRENT VALIDITY; NEGATIVE AFFECT; VALIDATION; INSTRUMENT; CONSENSUS;
D O I
10.1177/1073191114548029
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
The Five Factor Borderline Inventory (FFBI) is a new self-report measure developed to assess traits of borderline personality disorder (BPD) from the perspective of the Five Factor Model of general personality. The current study sought to first replicate initial validity findings for the FFBI and then to further validate the FFBI with predispositional risk factors of the biosocial theory of BPD and with commonly associated features of BPD (e.g., depression, low self-esteem) utilizing two samples of young adults (N = 87; 85) who have engaged in nonsuicidal self-injury. The FFBI showed strong convergent and discriminant validity across two measures of the Five Factor Model and also correlated strongly with measures of impulsivity, emotion dysregulation, and BPD. The FFBI also related to two measures of early childhood emotional vulnerability and parental invalidation and measures of depression, anxiety, and self-esteem. Overall, the results provide support for the FFBI as a measure of BPD.
引用
收藏
页码:319 / 331
页数:13
相关论文
共 69 条
[51]   A meta-analytic review of the relationships between the five-factor model and DSM-IV-TR personality disorders: A facet level analysis [J].
Samuel, Douglas B. ;
Widiger, Thomas A. .
CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2008, 28 (08) :1326-1342
[52]   RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN THOUGHT SUPPRESSION AND SYMPTOMS OF BORDERLINE PERSONALITY DISORDER [J].
Sauer, Shannon E. ;
Baer, Ruth A. .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY DISORDERS, 2009, 23 (01) :48-61
[53]   The five-factor model and personality disorder empirical literature: A meta-analytic review [J].
Saulsman, LM ;
Page, AC .
CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2004, 23 (08) :1055-1085
[54]   Stability of retrospective reports in depression: Traumatic events, past depressive episodes, and parental psychopathology [J].
Schraedley, PK ;
Turner, RJ ;
Gotlib, IH .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH AND SOCIAL BEHAVIOR, 2002, 43 (03) :307-316
[55]   THE COURSE OF ANXIETY DISORDERS OTHER THAN PTSD IN PATIENTS WITH BORDERLINE PERSONALITY DISORDER AND AXIS II COMPARISON SUBJECTS: A 10-YEAR FOLLOW-UP STUDY [J].
Silverman, Merav H. ;
Frankenburg, Frances R. ;
Reich, D. Bradford ;
Fitzmaurice, Garrett ;
Zanarini, Mary C. .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY DISORDERS, 2012, 26 (05) :804-814
[56]   How shy is too shy? [J].
Stein, MB .
LANCET, 1996, 347 (9009) :1131-1132
[57]   Categorical and dimensional models of personality disorder [J].
Trull, Timothy J. ;
Durrett, Christine A. .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 1 :355-380
[59]   Borderline personality disorder features in nonclinical young adults .2. Two-year outcome [J].
Trull, TJ ;
Useda, JD ;
Conforti, K ;
Doan, BT .
JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1997, 106 (02) :307-314
[60]   CATEGORICAL VERSUS DIMENSIONAL STATUS OF BORDERLINE PERSONALITY-DISORDER [J].
TRULL, TJ ;
WIDIGER, TA ;
GUTHRIE, P .
JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1990, 99 (01) :40-48