Investigating perspective taking when infrastructure megaproject teams engage local communities: Navigating tensions and balancing perspectives

被引:25
作者
Cuganesan, Suresh [1 ]
Floris, Maurizio [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Business Sch, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ New South Wales, Australian Grad Sch Management, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
Infrastructure megaprojects; Community engagement; Perspective-taking; Paradox; STAKEHOLDER; PARADOXES; MODEL; CONTRADICTIONS; STRATEGIES; MANAGERS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijproman.2020.01.006
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Research on infrastructure megaprojects and community engagement is increasingly concerned with the cognitive factors that underpin engagement processes and actions. The ability of project teams to take the perspective of local communities is an important influence on how community engagement occurs. However this involves project teams confronting contradictions and tensions between local community perspectives and their own. Understanding how project teams respond to tensions between and seek to balance both perspectives is thus important, but this is relatively unexplored in literature to date. In response, this study utilizes the concept of 'perspective-taking', adopting a paradox lens to examine how tensions between the perspectives of local communities and project teams manifest and how project teams navigate these during community engagement. Through an exploratory case, the study reveals the specific cognitive attributes that enable infrastructure megaproject teams to be more effective in perspective-taking through balancing both local community and their own perspectives.
引用
收藏
页码:153 / 164
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   Towards an improved understanding of project stakeholder landscapes [J].
Aaltonen, Kirsi ;
Kujala, Jaakko .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2016, 34 (08) :1537-1552
[2]   Stakeholder Dynamics During the Project Front-End: The Case of Nuclear Waste Repository Projects [J].
Aaltonen, Kirsi ;
Kujala, Jaakko ;
Havela, Laura ;
Savage, Grant .
PROJECT MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2015, 46 (06) :15-41
[3]   Project stakeholder analysis as an environmental interpretation process [J].
Aaltonen, Kirsi .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2011, 29 (02) :165-183
[4]  
Andriopoulos, 2017, OXFORD HDB ORG PARAD
[5]   Exploitation-Exploration Tensions and Organizational Ambidexterity: Managing Paradoxes of Innovation [J].
Andriopoulos, Constantine ;
Lewis, Marianne W. .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2009, 20 (04) :696-717
[6]   Breaking down the site hoardings: attitudes and approaches to community consultation during construction [J].
Close, Robert ;
Loosemore, Martin .
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMICS, 2014, 32 (7-8) :816-828
[7]   Identity Paradoxes: How Senior Managers and Employees Negotiate Similarity and Distinctiveness Tensions over Time [J].
Cuganesan, Suresh .
ORGANIZATION STUDIES, 2017, 38 (3-4) :489-511
[8]   Stakeholder engagement in large-scale energy infrastructure projects: Revealing perspectives using Q methodology [J].
Cuppen, Eefje ;
Bosch-Rekveldt, Marian G. C. ;
Pikaar, Ewout ;
Mehos, Donna C. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2016, 34 (07) :1347-1359
[9]   Project governance and stakeholders: a literature review [J].
Derakhshan, Roya ;
Turner, Rodney ;
Mancini, Mauro .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2019, 37 (01) :98-116
[10]   PLANNING, POLITICS, AND URBAN MEGA-PROJECTS IN DEVELOPMENTAL CONTEXT: LESSONS FROM MEXICO CITY'S AIRPORT CONTROVERSY [J].
Dewey, Onesimo Flores ;
Davis, Diane E. .
JOURNAL OF URBAN AFFAIRS, 2013, 35 (05) :531-551