How could firm's internal R & D collaboration bring more innovation?

被引:51
作者
Zhang, Guiyang [1 ,2 ]
Tang, Chaoying [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Qin Nian Gong Yu 7-208,Zhong Guan Cun Dong Lu 80, Beijing 100190, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
R & D collaboration; Technological heterogeneity; Combinatorial potential; Firm innovation performance; Two-mode network analysis; ABSORPTIVE-CAPACITY; SELECTIVE RETENTION; KNOWLEDGE NETWORKS; STRUCTURAL HOLES; BLIND VARIATION; PERFORMANCE; COMPETITION; CREATIVITY; IMPACT; BROKERAGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.techfore.2017.07.007
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Encouraging internal research and development collaboration has been recognized as an effective management strategy to facilitate firms' innovation. The reasons include that extensive collaboration among employees may promote the flow of diversified knowledge, bring forth novel knowledge combination and in turn facilitate firms' innovation. To put it forward, this study supposes that technological heterogeneity among employees and the combinatorial potential of firm's technologies should be taken into account. To do that, multi networks including two-mode network are contained and their interacting effects are analyzed. The analysis results based on 13 years' patent data of 39 Chinese innovative firms in telecommunication, electrical machinery, automobile, and pharmaceutical industries show that collaboration breadth of employees positively affects firms' innovation performance. Technological heterogeneity among employees positively moderates the relationship between collaboration breadth and innovation performance. Combinatorial potential of firm's technologies, together with technological heterogeneity among employees, exerts a three-way moderating effect on the relationship. Contributions to theories of collaborative innovation and suggestions to R & D managers are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:299 / 308
页数:10
相关论文
共 73 条
[1]   Innovation and Institutional Ownership [J].
Aghion, Philippe ;
Van Reenen, John ;
Zingales, Luigi .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2013, 103 (01) :277-304
[2]   Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study [J].
Ahuja, G .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2000, 45 (03) :425-455
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2003, Theories of Communication Networks
[4]  
Beersma B, 2003, ACAD MANAGE J, V46, P572, DOI [10.2307/30040650, 10.5465/30040650]
[5]   Close to you? Bias and precision in patent-based measures of technological proximity [J].
Benner, Mary ;
Waldfogel, Joel .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2008, 37 (09) :1556-1567
[6]  
Beyerlein M., 2003, Journal of Organizational Excellence, V22, P51
[7]   Competitive mindsets, creativity, and the role of regulatory focus [J].
Bittner, Jenny V. ;
Heidemeier, Heike .
THINKING SKILLS AND CREATIVITY, 2013, 9 :59-68
[8]  
Board China Innovative Enterprises Development Report Editorial, 2015, CHINA INN ENT DEV RE
[9]  
Borgatti S.P., 2018, Analyzing social networks
[10]   Network analysis of 2-mode data [J].
Borgatti, SP ;
Everett, MG .
SOCIAL NETWORKS, 1997, 19 (03) :243-269