Rs-198 Liquid Biofertilizers Affect Microbial Community Diversity and Enzyme Activities and Promote Vitis vinifera L. Growth

被引:12
作者
Lu, Huadan [1 ]
Wu, Zhansheng [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Wenfei [1 ]
Xu, Xiaolin [1 ]
Liu, Xiaochen [2 ]
机构
[1] Shihezi Univ, Sch Chem & Chem Engn, Shihezi 832003, Peoples R China
[2] Xian Polytech Univ, Sch Environm & Chem Engn, Xian 710048, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
PSEUDOMONAS-PUTIDA RS-198; PLANT-GROWTH; SOIL; RHIZOBACTERIA; ROOT; INOCULATION; TOLERANCE; RESPONSES; TOMATO; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1155/2020/8321462
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Chemical fertilizers were applied on perennial tree vines to obtain high yields, which have resulted in considerable deterioration of soil quality, and it is likely to have negative impacts on the development of the grape industry. In this study,P. putidaRs-198 liquid biofertilizer (Rs198LBF) was inoculated into grape rhizosphere soils to assess its influence on grape growth and microbial community. Field experiment results showed that grape growth and quality increased depending on the concentrations of Rs198LBF applications. The berry weight, length, and width in addition with 60 ml Rs198LBF (1.44x1013 cfu ml-1Rs-198) per grapevine treatment (BFP3) were 17.2%, 6.2%, and 4.4% higher than those of CK (control, non-inoculation) treatment, respectively. The available phosphorus contents in addition with 40 ml Rs198LBF per grapevine (BFP2) and BFP3 treatments were 12.6% and 55.3% higher than those of CK treatment (P<0.05). The activities of invertase and alkaline phosphatase were improved in BFP2 and BFP3 treatment compared with those in CK. The relative abundance of potentially beneficial bacteria significantly increased compared with that in CK treatment (P<0.05). The clusters of orthologous groups (COG) annotation illustrated that the application of 60 ml Rs198LBF increased the relative abundance of metabolic genes in rhizosphere soil. The results of this study show that biofertilizer is very effective in enhancing plant growth and affects soil community diversity.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   Biofertilizer effects in combination with different drying system and storage period on growth and production of tomato plant under field conditions [J].
Altuhaish, Adeel ;
Hamim ;
Tjahjoleksono, Aris .
EMIRATES JOURNAL OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE, 2014, 26 (08) :716-722
[2]   Response of Wheat to a Multiple Species Microbial Inoculant Compared to Fertilizer Application [J].
Assainar, Salmabi K. ;
Abbott, Lynette K. ;
Mickan, Bede S. ;
Whiteley, Andrew S. ;
Siddique, Kadambot M. M. ;
Solaiman, Zakaria M. .
FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2018, 9
[3]  
Bao S., 1988, Soil and agriculture chemistry analysis
[4]   Morphological variation in tomato: a comprehensive study of quantitative trait loci controlling fruit shape and development [J].
Brewer, Marin Talbot ;
Moyseenko, Jennifer B. ;
Monforte, Antonio J. ;
van der Knaap, Esther .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY, 2007, 58 (06) :1339-1349
[5]   Biofertilizers regulate the soil microbial community and enhance Panax ginseng yields [J].
Dong, Linlin ;
Li, Yong ;
Xu, Jiang ;
Yang, Juan ;
Wei, Guangfei ;
Shen, Liang ;
Ding, Wanlong ;
Chen, Shilin .
CHINESE MEDICINE, 2019, 14
[6]   METHOD OF MEASURING INVERTASE ACTIVITY IN SOILS [J].
FRANKENBERGER, WT ;
JOHANSON, JB .
PLANT AND SOIL, 1983, 74 (03) :301-311
[7]   CONDUCTIMETRIC DETERMINATION OF SOIL UREASE ACTIVITY [J].
GOSEWINKEL, U ;
BROADBENT, FE .
COMMUNICATIONS IN SOIL SCIENCE AND PLANT ANALYSIS, 1984, 15 (11) :1377-1389
[8]  
Guan SY, 1986, SOIL ENZYMES RES MET
[9]   Continuous application of different fertilizers induces distinct bulk and rhizosphere soil protist communities [J].
Guo, Sai ;
Xiong, Wu ;
Xu, Hang ;
Hang, Xinnan ;
Liu, Hongjun ;
Xun, Weibing ;
Li, Rong ;
Shen, Qirong .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOIL BIOLOGY, 2018, 88 :8-14
[10]   EFFECT OF GRAPE REPLANT ON THE SOIL MICROBIAL COMMUNITY STRUCTURE AND DIVERSITY [J].
Guo, Xiu-wu ;
Li, Kun ;
Guo, Yin-shan ;
Xie, Hong-gang ;
Sun, Ying-ni ;
Hu, Xi-xi .
BIOTECHNOLOGY & BIOTECHNOLOGICAL EQUIPMENT, 2011, 25 (02) :2334-2340