Effects of contextual cues on speech recognition in simulated electric-acoustic stimulation

被引:14
作者
Kong, Ying-Yee [1 ]
Donaldson, Gail [2 ]
Somarowthu, Ala [3 ]
机构
[1] Northeastern Univ, Dept Commun Sci & Disorders, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Univ S Florida, Dept Commun Sci & Disorders, Tampa, FL 33620 USA
[3] Northeastern Univ, Dept Bioengn, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
VOICE FUNDAMENTAL-FREQUENCY; PERCEPTUAL RESTORATION; COCHLEAR; BENEFIT; INTEGRATION; SENTENCES; HEARING; WORDS; NOISE; MODEL;
D O I
10.1121/1.4919337
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Low-frequency acoustic cues have shown to improve speech perception in cochlear-implant listeners. However, the mechanisms underlying this benefit are still not well understood. This study investigated the extent to which low-frequency cues can facilitate listeners' use of linguistic knowledge in simulated electric-acoustic stimulation (EAS). Experiment 1 examined differences in the magnitude of EAS benefit at the phoneme, word, and sentence levels. Speech materials were processed via noise-channel vocoding and lowpass (LP) filtering. The amount of spectral degradation in the vocoder speech was varied by applying different numbers of vocoder channels. Normal-hearing listeners were tested on vocoder-alone, LP-alone, and vocoder +LP conditions. Experiment 2 further examined factors that underlie the context effect on EAS benefit at the sentence level by limiting the low-frequency cues to temporal envelope and periodicity (AM+FM). Results showed that EAS benefit was greater for higher-context than for lower-context speech materials even when the LP ear received only low-frequency AM+FM cues. Possible explanations for the greater EAS benefit observed with higher-context materials may lie in the interplay between perceptual and expectation-driven processes for EAS speech recognition, and/or the band-importance functions for different types of speech materials. (C) 2015 Acoustical Society of America.
引用
收藏
页码:2846 / 2857
页数:12
相关论文
共 41 条
[31]   REVISED CNC LISTS FOR AUDITORY TESTS [J].
PETERSON, GE ;
LEHISTE, I .
JOURNAL OF SPEECH AND HEARING DISORDERS, 1962, 27 (01) :62-70
[32]   SPEAKING CLEARLY FOR THE HARD-OF-HEARING .2. ACOUSTIC CHARACTERISTICS OF CLEAR AND CONVERSATIONAL SPEECH [J].
PICHENY, MA ;
DURLACH, NI ;
BRAIDA, LD .
JOURNAL OF SPEECH AND HEARING RESEARCH, 1986, 29 (04) :434-446
[33]   RELATIONS AMONG DIFFERENT MEASURES OF SPEECH RECEPTION IN SUBJECTS USING A COCHLEAR IMPLANT [J].
RABINOWITZ, WM ;
EDDINGTON, DK ;
DELHORNE, LA ;
CUNEO, PA .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1992, 92 (04) :1869-1881
[34]   Integration across frequency bands for consonant identification [J].
Ronan, D ;
Dix, AK ;
Shah, P ;
Braida, LD .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2004, 116 (03) :1749-1762
[35]   SPEECH RECOGNITION WITH PRIMARILY TEMPORAL CUES [J].
SHANNON, RV ;
ZENG, FG ;
KAMATH, V ;
WYGONSKI, J ;
EKELID, M .
SCIENCE, 1995, 270 (5234) :303-304
[36]   The use of fundamental frequency for lexical segmentation in listeners with cochlear implants [J].
Spitzer, Stephanie ;
Liss, Julie ;
Spahr, Tony ;
Dorman, Michael ;
Lansford, Kaitlin .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2009, 125 (06) :EL236-EL241
[37]   VISUAL CONTRIBUTION TO SPEECH INTELLIGIBILITY IN NOISE [J].
SUMBY, WH ;
POLLACK, I .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1954, 26 (02) :212-215
[38]   Cross-language differences in cue use for speech segmentation [J].
Tyler, Michael D. ;
Cutler, Anne .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2009, 126 (01) :367-376
[39]   PERCEPTUAL RESTORATION OF MISSING SPEECH SOUNDS [J].
WARREN, RM .
SCIENCE, 1970, 167 (3917) :392-&
[40]   SPEECH PERCEPTION AND PHONEMIC RESTORATIONS [J].
WARREN, RM ;
OBUSEK, CJ .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1971, 9 (3B) :358-&