Word category and verb-argument structure information in the dynamics of parsing

被引:52
作者
Frisch, S
Hahne, A
Friederici, AD
机构
[1] Univ Potsdam, Inst Linguist, D-14415 Potsdam, Germany
[2] Max Planck Inst Cognit Neurosci, Leipzig, Germany
关键词
language processing; event-related potentials; word category; argument structure;
D O I
10.1016/j.cognition.2003.09.009
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
One of the core issues in psycholinguistic research concerns the relationship between word category information and verb-argument structure (e.g. transitivity) information of verbs in the process of sentence parsing. In two experiments (visual versus auditory presentation) using event-related brain potentials (ERPs), we addressed this question by presenting sentences in which the critical word simultaneously realized both a word category and a transitivity violation. ERPs for sentences with both types of violation clustered with the patterns for sentences with a word category violation only, but were different from the patterns elicited by argument structure violations in isolation, since only the latter elicited an N400 ERP component. The finding that an argument structure violation evoked an N400 only if the phrase structure of the respective sentence was correct suggests that a successful integration of the word category information of a verb functionally precedes the application of its argument structure information. (C) 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:191 / 219
页数:29
相关论文
共 72 条
[11]  
Chomsky N., 1981, Lectures on Government and Binding: the Pisan Lectures, DOI DOI 10.1515/9783110884166
[12]   THE N400 AS A FUNCTION OF THE LEVEL OF PROCESSING [J].
CHWILLA, DJ ;
BROWN, CM ;
HAGOORT, P .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 1995, 32 (03) :274-285
[13]   PARSING ARGUMENTS - PHRASE STRUCTURE AND ARGUMENT STRUCTURE AS DETERMINANTS OF INITIAL PARSING DECISIONS [J].
CLIFTON, C ;
SPEER, S ;
ABNEY, SP .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 1991, 30 (02) :251-271
[14]   Expect the unexpected: Event-related brain response to morphosyntactic violations [J].
Coulson, S ;
King, JW ;
Kutas, M .
LANGUAGE AND COGNITIVE PROCESSES, 1998, 13 (01) :21-58
[15]   THE INDEPENDENCE OF SYNTACTIC PROCESSING [J].
FERREIRA, F ;
CLIFTON, C .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 1986, 25 (03) :348-368
[16]   BRAIN POTENTIALS RELATED TO STAGES OF SENTENCE VERIFICATION [J].
FISCHLER, I ;
BLOOM, PA ;
CHILDERS, DG ;
ROUCOS, SE ;
PERRY, NW .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 1983, 20 (04) :400-409
[17]   MAKING AND CORRECTING ERRORS DURING SENTENCE COMPREHENSION - EYE-MOVEMENTS IN THE ANALYSIS OF STRUCTURALLY AMBIGUOUS SENTENCES [J].
FRAZIER, L ;
RAYNER, K .
COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 1982, 14 (02) :178-210
[18]   SYNTACTIC PROCESSING - EVIDENCE FROM DUTCH [J].
FRAZIER, L .
NATURAL LANGUAGE & LINGUISTIC THEORY, 1987, 5 (04) :519-559
[19]  
Frazier L., 1996, Construal
[20]  
FREIDERICI AD, 1999, LANGUAGE COMPREHENSI, P265