Tillering dynamics of marandu palisadegrass submitted to two cutting heights and three cutting intervals

被引:27
作者
dos Santos Difante, Gelson [1 ]
do Nascimento, Domicio, Jr. [2 ]
da Silva, Sila Carneiro [3 ]
Batista Euclides, Valeria Pacheco [4 ]
de Moura Zanine, Anderson [1 ]
Adese, Bruna [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Vicosa, Programa Posgrad Zootecn, Vicosa, MG, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Vicosa, Dept Zootecn, Vicosa, MG, Brazil
[3] Univ Sao Paulo, ESALQ, Dept Zootecn, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[4] Embrapa Gado Corte, Campo Grande, MS, Brazil
来源
REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ZOOTECNIA-BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE | 2008年 / 37卷 / 02期
关键词
ecophysiology; stability index; tiller generations;
D O I
10.1590/S1516-35982008000200003
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
The study was conducted to evaluate the dynamics of the tillering process in marandu palisadegrass submitted to two cutting heights (15 and 30 cm), and three cutting intervals (leaf appearance intervals of three, four and five leaves per tiller). A complete randomized block design, with three replications and a 2 x 3 factorial arrangement was used. Evaluations consited of monthly measurements of tiller appearance and death in two tussocks per plot, with new tillers sorted into basal and aerial tillers. Cutting at 15 cm resulted in higher tiller appearance, 1.46 tiller/100 tiller. day, and death rates, 0.368 tiller/100 tiller. day. The five-leaf cutting interval resulted in the lowest tiller appearance rate when associated with the 30 cm cutting height, 0.97 tiller/100 tiller. day. Swards cut at 15 cm presented smaller variations in tiller population, regardless of the cutting frequency used. The dynamics of basal, aerial and total tillering responded differently to cutting frequency and intensity, consequence of the physiological state of plants and prevailing environmental conditions during the experiment.
引用
收藏
页码:189 / 196
页数:8
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]   Tiller dynamics of perennial ryegrass cultivars derived from different New Zealand ecotypes: effects of cultivar, season, nitrogen fertiliser, and irrigation [J].
Bahmani, I ;
Thom, ER ;
Matthew, C ;
Hooper, RJ ;
Lemaire, G .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 2003, 54 (08) :803-817
[2]  
Briske D. D., 1991, GRAZING MANAGEMENT E, P85
[3]  
BULTER JL, 1988, OIKOS, V51, P306
[4]  
CARVALHO C. A. B. de, 2001, PESQUISA AGROPECUARI, V36, P567, DOI 10.1590/S0100-204X2001000300023
[5]  
COTTIGNIES A, 1988, J PLANT PHYSIOL, V132, P1, DOI 10.1016/S0176-1617(88)80173-1
[6]  
DASIILVA SC, 2004, GRASSLAND ECOPHYSIOL, P1
[7]  
*EMPR BRAS PESQ AG, 1999, SIST BRAS CLASS SOL
[8]  
FILHO CVS, 1992, PASTURAS TROPICALES, V14, P7
[9]  
Lemaire G., 1996, The Ecology and management of grazing system, P3, DOI DOI 10.2307/3802360
[10]  
Matthew C., 2000, Grassland ecophysiology and grazing ecology, P127, DOI 10.1079/9780851994529.0127