The effects of an action's "age-of-acquisition" on action-sentence processing

被引:2
作者
Gilead, Michael [1 ]
Liberman, Nira [2 ]
Maril, Anat [3 ]
机构
[1] Ben Gurion Univ Negev, Dept Psychol, IL-84105 Beer Sheva, Israel
[2] Tel Aviv Univ, Sch Psychol Sci, IL-69978 Tel Aviv, Israel
[3] Hebrew Univ Jerusalem, Dept Psychol, Dept Cognit Sci, IL-91905 Jerusalem, Israel
基金
以色列科学基金会;
关键词
fMRI; Social cognition; Embodied cognition; Abstract cognition; Age of acquisition; Action sentence processing; NEURAL SYSTEMS; SOCIAL COGNITION; DEFAULT MODE; ACTION WORDS; BRAIN; METAANALYSIS; CORTEX; MOTOR; EMBODIMENT; FREQUENCY;
D O I
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.07.034
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
How does our brain allow us comprehend abstract/symbolic descriptions of human action? Whereas past research suggested that processing action language relies on sensorimotor brain regions, recent work suggests that sensorimotor activation depends on participants' task goals, such that focusing on abstract (vs. concrete) aspects of an action activates "default mode network" (rather than sensorimotor) regions. Following a Piagetian framework, we hypothesized that for actions acquired at an age wherein abstract/symbolic cognition is fully-developed, even when participants focus on the concrete aspects of an action, they should retrieve abstract-symbolic mental representations. In two studies, participants processed the concrete (i.e., "how") and abstract (i.e., "why") aspects of late-acquired and early-acquired actions. Consistent with previous research, focusing on the abstract (vs. concrete) aspects of an action resulted in greater activation in the "defaultmode network". Importantly, the activation in these regions was higher when processing later-acquired (vs. earlier acquired) actions-also when participants' goal was to focus on the concrete aspects of the action. We discuss the implications of the current findings to research on the involvement of concrete representations in abstract cognition. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:341 / 349
页数:9
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]   Modality and abstract concepts [J].
Adams, F ;
Campbell, K .
BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, 1999, 22 (04) :610-+
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1983, The modularity of mind
[3]  
[Anonymous], FRONT HUM NEUROSCI, V8, P409, DOI [10.3389/fnhum.2014.00409, DOI 10.3389/FNHUM.2014, DOI 10.3389/FNHUM.2014.00409]
[4]   What do brain lesions tell us about theories of embodied semantics and the human mirror neuron system? [J].
Arevalo, Analia L. ;
Baldo, Juliana V. ;
Dronkers, Nina F. .
CORTEX, 2012, 48 (02) :242-254
[5]  
Barsalou LW, 1999, BEHAV BRAIN SCI, V22, P577, DOI 10.1017/S0140525X99532147
[6]   Where Is the Semantic System? A Critical Review and Meta-Analysis of 120 Functional Neuroimaging Studies [J].
Binder, Jeffrey R. ;
Desai, Rutvik H. ;
Graves, William W. ;
Conant, Lisa L. .
CEREBRAL CORTEX, 2009, 19 (12) :2767-2796
[7]   A broad assessment of theory of mind in adolescence: The complexity of mindreading [J].
Bosco, Francesca M. ;
Gabbatore, Ilaria ;
Tirassa, Maurizio .
CONSCIOUSNESS AND COGNITION, 2014, 24 :84-97
[8]   STAGE QUESTION IN COGNITIVE-DEVELOPMENTAL THEORY [J].
BRAINERD, CJ .
BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, 1978, 1 (02) :173-181
[9]  
Brett M., 2002, NEUROIMAGE, V16, pS497., DOI DOI 10.1016/S1053-8119(02)90010-8
[10]   Infants generate goal-based action predictions [J].
Cannon, Erin N. ;
Woodward, Amanda L. .
DEVELOPMENTAL SCIENCE, 2012, 15 (02) :292-298