Towards an approach of disability along a continuum from robustness, pre-frailty, frailty to disability

被引:6
|
作者
Zamudio-Rodriguez, Alfonso [1 ]
Avila-Funes, Jose Alberto [1 ,2 ]
Tabue-Teguo, Maturin [1 ,3 ]
Dartigues, Jean-Francois [1 ]
Amieva, Helene [1 ]
Peres, Karine [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bordeaux, Bordeaux Populat Hlth Res Ctr, INSERM, Bordeaux, France
[2] Inst Nacl Ciencias Med & Nutr Salvador Zubiran, Dept Geriatr, Mexico City 14080, Mexico
[3] Univ Antilles Guadeloupe, Equipe LAMIA, CHU Pointe a Pitre Guadeloupe, Pointe A Pitre, France
关键词
frailty; activities of daily living; hierarchical process; mortality; older people; PERFORMANCE; MOBILITY; RISK; IMPAIRMENT; PREDICTION; VALIDATION; ADULTS; GO;
D O I
10.1093/ageing/afac025
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Background: frailty and disability are very prevalent in older age and although both are distinct clinical entities, they are commonly used indistinctly in order to identify vulnerable older adults. Objective: to propose a hierarchical indicator between frailty and disability among older adults along a single continuum. Design: population-based cohort study. Setting: the Bordeaux Three-City Study and the Aging Multidisciplinary Investigation (AMI) cohort. Subjects the sample included 1800 participants aged 65 and older. Methods: an additive hierarchical indicator was proposed by combining the phenotype of frailty (robustness, pre-frailty and frailty), instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) and basic activities of daily living (ADL). To test the relevance of this indicator, we estimated the 4-year mortality risk associated with each stage of the indicator. Results: in total, 34.0% were Robust (n = 612), 29.9% were Pre-frail (n = 538), 3.2% were Robust with IADL-disability (n = 58), 4.6% had pure Frailty (no disability) (n = 82), 11.9% were Pre-frail + IADL (n = 215), 8.6% were Frail + IADL (n = 154) and 7.8% Frail + IADL + ADL (n = 141). After grouping grades with similar mortality risks, we obtained a five-grade hierarchical indicator ranging from robustness to severe stage of the continuum. Each state presented a gradually increasing risk of dying compared to the robust group (from Hazard Ratio (HR) = 2.20 [1.49-3.25] to 15.10 [9.99-22.82]). Conclusions: We confirmed that combining pre-frailty, frailty, IADL- and ADL-disability into a single indicator may improve our understanding of the aging process. Pre-frailty identified as the 'entry door' into the process may represent a key stage that could offer new opportunities for early, targeted, individualized and tailored interventions and care in clinical geriatrics.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Prevalence of multidimensional frailty and pre-frailty in older people in different settings: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Veronese, Nicola
    Custodero, Carlo
    Cella, Alberto
    Demurtas, Jacopo
    Zora, Sabrina
    Maggi, Stefania
    Barbagallo, Mario
    Sabba, Carlo
    Ferrucci, Luigi
    Pilotto, Alberto
    AGEING RESEARCH REVIEWS, 2021, 72
  • [32] Pre-frailty, frailty, and multimorbidity: Prevalences and associated characteristics from two French national surveys
    C. Le Cossec
    A.-L. Perrine
    N. Beltzer
    C. Fuhrman
    Laure Carcaillon-Bentata
    The journal of nutrition, health & aging, 2016, 20 : 860 - 869
  • [33] Heart failure, frailty, and pre-frailty: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies
    Marengoni, Alessandra
    Zucchelli, Alberto
    Vetrano, Davide L.
    Aloisi, Gaetano
    Brandi, Vincenzo
    Ciutan, Marius
    Panait, Carmen Lavinia
    Bernabei, Roberto
    Onder, Graziano
    Palmer, Katie
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2020, 316 : 161 - 171
  • [34] Distinguishing Comorbidity, Disability, and Frailty
    Espinoza S.E.
    Quiben M.
    Hazuda H.P.
    Current Geriatrics Reports, 2018, 7 (4) : 201 - 209
  • [35] The Benefits of a Frailty Index for People With Intellectual Disability: A Commentary
    Schoufour, Josje D.
    Evenhuis, Heleen M.
    Mitnitski, Arnold
    Rockwood, Kenneth
    Echteld, Michael A.
    JOURNAL OF POLICY AND PRACTICE IN INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES, 2015, 12 (03) : 232 - 234
  • [36] Acceptance of Disability and the Risk of Frailty
    St John, Philip D.
    Montgomery, Patrick R.
    CANADIAN GERIATRICS JOURNAL, 2013, 16 (03): : 105 - 110
  • [37] Sensor-based characterization of daily walking: a new paradigm in pre-frailty/frailty assessment
    Kumar, Danya Pradeep
    Toosizadeh, Nima
    Mohler, Jane
    Ehsani, Hossein
    Mannier, Cassidy
    Laksari, Kaveh
    BMC GERIATRICS, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [38] Prevalence and factors associated with pre-frailty and frailty among Korean older adults with heart failure
    Son, Youn-Jung
    Kim, Sang-Wook
    Lee, Wang-Soo
    Shin, Seung Yong
    Won, Hoyoun
    Cho, Jun Hwan
    Kim, Hyue Mee
    Hong, Joonhwa
    Choi, JiYeon
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2022, 78 (10) : 3235 - 3246
  • [39] The prediction of disability by self-reported physical frailty components of the Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI)
    Gobbens, R. J. J.
    van Assen, M. A. L. M.
    Schalk, M. J. D.
    ARCHIVES OF GERONTOLOGY AND GERIATRICS, 2014, 59 (02) : 280 - 287
  • [40] Combined effects of cognitive impairment and pre-frailty on future frailty and death in older Mexican Americans
    Downer, Brian
    Al Snih, Soham
    Howrey, Bret T.
    Raji, Mukaila A.
    Markides, Kyriakos S.
    Ottenbacher, Kenneth J.
    AGING & MENTAL HEALTH, 2019, 23 (10) : 1405 - 1412