Lessons for effective integrity management from the San Bruno pipeline rupture

被引:7
作者
Hayes, Jan [1 ]
机构
[1] RMIT Univ, Sch Property Construct & Project Management, Ctr Construct Work Hlth & Safety Res, Melbourne, Vic 3000, Australia
关键词
pipeline safety; integrity management; organizational safety; RISK ANALYSIS; SAFETY; WORKING; RULE;
D O I
10.1002/prs.11746
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
In September 2010, eight members of the public were killed when a gas transmission pipeline ruptured at San Bruno, California. This article describes the causes of this serious organizational failure with a view to learning by other organizations that operate hazardous facilities. The rupture occurred when a longitudinal seam weld failed. The weld had been poorly made at the time the pipeline was fabricated and installed in 1956. The line had not been inspected or tested since that time. While the details are specific to the case at hand, organizational lessons are valid for other organizations operating complex sociotechnical systems that face the problem of sleeping or latent faults that can remain dormant for many years. This analysis focuses on the organizational arrangements that led to such ineffective integrity management, in particular how the potential for an event such as the one that occurred was systematically ignored by the operating company for many years. The key to effective management of the potential for disaster is to ensure that risk management does not become a fantasy but remains grounded in the reality of the dangers that the assets pose to workers, the public, and to the organization itself. (c) 2015 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Process Saf Prog 34: 202-206, 2015
引用
收藏
页码:202 / 206
页数:5
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2007, BLACK SWAN
[2]  
Clarke L.B., 1999, Mission improbable
[3]  
CPUC, 2010, INV REP SEPT 9 2010
[4]   Promoting safety by increasing uncertainty - Implications for risk management [J].
Grote, Gudela .
SAFETY SCIENCE, 2015, 71 :71-79
[5]   Working to rule or working safely? Part 2: The management of safety rules and procedures [J].
Hale, Andrew ;
Borys, David .
SAFETY SCIENCE, 2013, 55 :222-231
[6]   Working to rule, or working safely? Part 1: A state of the art review [J].
Hale, Andrew ;
Borys, David .
SAFETY SCIENCE, 2013, 55 :207-221
[7]  
Hayes J., 2014, NIGHTMARE PIPELINE F
[8]  
Hayes J., 2013, Operational Decision-Making in High-Hazard Organizations: Drawing a Line in the Sand
[9]  
Middlehurst R., 1997, END PROFESSIONS REST
[10]  
Murphy J. F., 2015, PROCESS SAF PROG, V33, P110