Estimating a social cost of carbon for global energy consumption

被引:210
作者
Rode, Ashwin [1 ]
Carleton, Tamma [2 ,3 ]
Delgado, Michael [4 ]
Greenstone, Michael [3 ,5 ]
Houser, Trevor [4 ]
Hsiang, Solomon [3 ,6 ]
Hultgren, Andrew [1 ,5 ]
Jina, Amir [3 ,7 ]
Kopp, Robert E. [8 ,9 ]
McCusker, Kelly E. [4 ]
Nath, Ishan [10 ]
Rising, James [11 ]
Yuan, Jiacan [12 ,13 ,14 ,15 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chicago, Energy Policy Inst, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[2] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Bren Sch Environm Sci & Management, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USA
[3] Natl Bur Econ Res, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[4] Rhodium Grp, New York, NY USA
[5] Univ Chicago, Dept Econ, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[6] Univ Calif Berkeley, Goldman Sch Publ Policy, GLobal Policy Lab, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[7] Univ Chicago, Harris Sch Publ Policy, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[8] Rutgers State Univ, Dept Earth & Planetary Sci, New Brunswick, NJ USA
[9] Rutgers State Univ, Rutgers Inst Earth Ocean & Atmospher Sci, New Brunswick, NJ USA
[10] Princeton Univ, Dept Econ, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
[11] Univ Delaware, Sch Marine Sci & Policy, Newark, DE USA
[12] Fudan Univ, Dept Atmospher & Ocean Sci, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[13] Fudan Univ, Inst Atmospher Sci, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[14] Fudan Univ, IRDR ICoE Rig WECEIPHE, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[15] Fudan Univ, Big Data Inst Carbon Emiss & Environm Pollut, Shanghai, Peoples R China
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
CLIMATE-CHANGE; IMPULSE-RESPONSE; TEMPERATURE; ECONOMICS; IMPACTS; US; POPULATION; LEVEL; PROJECTIONS; MITIGATION;
D O I
10.1038/s41586-021-03883-8
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Estimates of global economic damage caused by carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions can inform climate policy(1-3). The social cost of carbon (SCC) quantifies these damages by characterizing how additional CO2 emissions today impact future economic outcomes through altering the climate(4-6). Previous estimates have suggested that large, warming-driven increases in energy expenditures could dominate the SCC7,8, but they rely on models(9-11) that are spatially coarse and not tightly linked to data(2,3,6,7,12,13). Here we show that the release of one ton of CO2 today is projected to reduce total future energy expenditures, with most estimates valued between -US$3 and -US$1, depending on discount rates. Our results are based on an architecture that integrates global data, econometrics and climate science to estimate local damages worldwide. Notably, we project that emerging economies in the tropics will dramatically increase electricity consumption owing to warming, which requires critical infrastructure planning. However, heating reductions in colder countries offset this increase globally. We estimate that 2099 annual global electricity consumption increases by about 4.5 exajoules (7 per cent of current global consumption) per one-degree-Celsius increase in global mean surface temperature (GMST), whereas direct consumption of other fuels declines by about 11.3 exajoules (7 per cent of current global consumption) per one-degree-Celsius increase in GMST. Our finding of net savings contradicts previous research(7,8), because global data indicate that many populations will remain too poor for most of the twenty-first century to substantially increase energy consumption in response to warming. Importantly, damage estimates would differ if poorer populations were given greater weight(14). Using global data, econometrics and climate science to estimate the damages induced by the emission of one ton of carbon dioxide, climate change is projected to increase electricity spending but reduce overall end-use energy expenditure.
引用
收藏
页码:308 / +
页数:22
相关论文
共 81 条
[31]  
Diaz D, 2017, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V7, P774, DOI [10.1038/nclimate3411, 10.1038/NCLIMATE3411]
[32]  
Diaz DelavaneB., 2014, Evaluating the Key Drivers of the US Government's Social Cost of Carbon: A Model Diagnostic and Inter-Comparison Study of Climate Impacts in DICE, FUND, and PAGE
[33]   The Long-Run Discount Rate Controversy [J].
Gollier, Christian ;
Hammitt, James K. .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF RESOURCE ECONOMICS, VOL 6, 2014, 6 :273-295
[34]   Developing a Social Cost of Carbon for US Regulatory Analysis: A Methodology and Interpretation [J].
Greenstone, Michael ;
Kopits, Elizabeth ;
Wolverton, Ann .
REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND POLICY, 2013, 7 (01) :23-46
[35]   Responses of energy use to climate change: A climate modeling study [J].
Hadley, Stanton W. ;
Erickson, David J., III ;
Hernandez, Jose Luis ;
Broniak, Christine T. ;
Blasing, T. J. .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2006, 33 (17)
[36]   Reconciling Cyclical Movements in the Marginal Value of Time and the Marginal Product of Labor [J].
Hall, Robert E. .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2009, 117 (02) :281-323
[37]   Estimating economic damage from climate change in the United States [J].
Hsiang, Solomon ;
Kopp, Robert ;
Jina, Amir ;
Rising, James ;
Delgado, Michael ;
Mohan, Shashank ;
Rasmussen, D. J. ;
Muir-Wood, Robert ;
Wilson, Paul ;
Oppenheimer, Michael ;
Larsen, Kate ;
Houser, Trevor .
SCIENCE, 2017, 356 (6345) :1362-1368
[38]   Climate Econometrics [J].
Hsiang, Solomon .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF RESOURCE ECONOMICS, VOL 8, 2016, 8 :43-75
[39]  
Huppmann D., 2018, IAMC 1.5C Scenario Explorer and Data hosted by IIASA
[40]  
IIASA Energy Program SSP Database, 2016, IIASA EN PROGR SSP D