Power Distance Belief and Workplace Communication: The Mediating Role of Fear of Authority

被引:24
作者
Dai, Yuwan [1 ]
Li, Hao [2 ]
Xie, Wenting [3 ]
Deng, Tianyi [4 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, Beijing Key Lab Behav & Mental Hlth, Sch Psychol & Cognit Sci, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China
[2] Tibet Univ, Plateau Brain Sci Res Ctr, Lhasa 850001, Peoples R China
[3] Tibet Univ, Sch Educ, Lhasa 850001, Peoples R China
[4] Peking Univ, Hlth Sci Ctr, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China
关键词
power distance belief; fear of authority; workplace accidents; communication with superiors; INDIVIDUALISM-COLLECTIVISM; ABUSIVE SUPERVISION; EMPLOYEE SILENCE; SELF-CONSTRUALS; SOCIAL ANXIETY; SAMPLE-SIZE; CROSS-LEVEL; CONSEQUENCES; ORIENTATION; PERSONALITY;
D O I
10.3390/ijerph19052932
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Power distance is the degree of acceptance of unequal distribution of power in societies. In a high power distance context, the acceptance of inequality conflicts with the operation of modern organizations, which causes obstacles to workplace communication or even triggers workplace accidents due to ineffective communication. We conducted four studies (N = 1063) to explore the relations between and mechanisms of power distance belief and workplace communication. In Study 1, the participants with high power distance belief had ineffective workplace communication-specifically ineffective communication with superiors-but no difference in communication with subordinates and colleagues. We further focused on the mechanism underlying the relationship between power distance belief and communication with superiors. A questionnaire study (Study 2) was conducted in three stages over a three-month period, and an experimental study (Study 3) indicated that fear of authority mediated the negative effect of high power distance on communication with superiors. A cross-culture study (Study 4) re-tested the hypotheses among Chinese and U.S. participants. This research provides insight into the mechanisms that explain the relationship between power distance belief and workplace communication, indicating that fear of authority is significant. Organizations should pay attention to power distance belief and fear of authority, as they may lead to workplace accidents due to communication disasters.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 81 条
[21]  
Facione P.A., 1990, CRITICAL THINKING ST, P6
[22]   G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences [J].
Faul, Franz ;
Erdfelder, Edgar ;
Lang, Albert-Georg ;
Buchner, Axel .
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2007, 39 (02) :175-191
[23]  
Fielding M., 2006, Effective communication in organisations
[24]   Low implicit self-esteem and dysfunctional automatic associations in social anxiety disorder [J].
Glashouwer, Klaske A. ;
Vroling, Maartje S. ;
de Jong, Peter J. ;
Lange, Wolf-Gero ;
de Keijser, Jos .
JOURNAL OF BEHAVIOR THERAPY AND EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHIATRY, 2013, 44 (02) :262-270
[25]   Polluted Psyche: Is the Effect of Air Pollution on Unethical Behavior More Physiological or Psychological? [J].
Gong, Shiyang ;
Lu, Jackson G. ;
Schaubroeck, John M. ;
Li, Qian ;
Zhou, Qiwei ;
Qian, Xiaoye .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2020, 31 (08) :1040-1047
[26]   The influence of cultural individualism-collectivism, self construals, and individual values on communication styles across cultures [J].
Gudykunst, WB ;
Matsumoto, Y ;
TingToomey, S ;
Nishida, T ;
Kim, K ;
Heyman, S .
HUMAN COMMUNICATION RESEARCH, 1996, 22 (04) :510-543
[27]   When Is Silence Golden? A Meta-analysis on Antecedents and Outcomes of Employee Silence [J].
Hao, Leilei ;
Zhu, Hui ;
He, Yuqian ;
Duan, Jinyun ;
Zhao, Teng ;
Meng, Hui .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS AND PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 37 (05) :1039-1063
[28]   50 Years of "Obedience to Authority": From Blind Conformity to Engaged Followership [J].
Haslam, S. Alexander ;
Reicher, Stephen D. .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF LAW AND SOCIAL SCIENCE, VOL 13, 2017, 13 :59-78
[29]  
Hayes A. F., 2017, INTRO MEDIATION MODE
[30]  
Hofstede G., 1991, CULTURES ORG, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0005-7967(02)00184-5