Conventional and predicted Perceptibility Curves for contrast-enhanced direct digital intraoral radiographs

被引:11
作者
Yoshiura, K
Welander, U
Shi, XQ
Li, G
Kawazu, T
Tatsumi, M
Okamura, K
McDavid, WD
Kanda, S
机构
[1] Kyushu Univ, Grad Sch Dent Sci, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Radiol, Fukuoka 812, Japan
[2] Karolinska Inst, Dept Oral Radiol, Stockholm, Sweden
[3] Univ Texas, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Dent Diagnost Sci, San Antonio, TX USA
关键词
radiography; dental; digital radiography; radiographic image enhancement;
D O I
10.1038/sj.dmfr.4600607
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives: To construct Perceptibility Curves (PCs) for contrast-enhanced digital intraoral radiographs Methods: Radiographs of a test object having holes of increasing depths were exposed using three digital systems, the CDR (Schick Technologies, Long Island, NY, USA), the Dixel (J Morita MFG, Kyoto, Japan) and the Sens-A-Ray (Regam Medical Systems, Sundsvall, Sweden). The radiographs were contrast-enhanced and PCs constructed in the conventional way using 10 observers. Predicted PCs were calculated and compared with observer data. Results: The PCs showed that contrast enhancement is effective for the perception of small contrast details, especially in the low exposure range. Predicted PCs demonstrated excellent agreement with observer data. Conclusions: Contrast enhancement should be advantageous in digital radiography. The effects of contrast enhancement on PCs may be predicted without previous knowledge of observer performance.
引用
收藏
页码:219 / 225
页数:7
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   THE INFLUENCE OF AMBIENT AND VIEWBOX LIGHT UPON VISUAL DETECTION OF LOW-CONTRAST TARGETS IN A RADIOGRAPH [J].
ALTER, AJ ;
KARGAS, GA ;
KARGAS, SA ;
CAMERON, JR ;
MCDERMOTT, JC .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 1982, 17 (04) :402-406
[2]  
BOLLEN R, 1979, PHYSICS MED IMAGING, P588
[3]   Effect of different background lighting conditions on diagnostic performance of digital and film images [J].
Cederberg, RA ;
Frederiksen, NL ;
Benson, BW ;
Shulman, JD .
DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 1998, 27 (05) :293-297
[4]   NEW APPROACH TO EVALUATION OF RADIOGRAPHIC SYSTEMS [J].
DEBELDER, M ;
BOLLEN, R ;
DUVILLE, R .
JOURNAL OF PHOTOGRAPHIC SCIENCE, 1971, 19 (05) :126-&
[5]   DIRECT DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY FOR THE DETECTION OF DEFECTS IN A STANDARD ALUMINUM TEST OBJECT THROUGH COMPOSITE RESIN RESTORATIVE MATERIALS [J].
GOLUBOW, NA ;
FARMAN, AG ;
VONFRAUNHOFER, JA ;
KELLY, MS .
DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 1994, 23 (02) :91-96
[6]   Observers' use of image enhancement in assessing caries in radiographs taken by four intra-oral digital systems [J].
Gotfredsen, E ;
Wenzel, A ;
Grondahl, HG .
DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 1996, 25 (01) :34-38
[7]   DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY [J].
HARRISON, RM .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1988, 33 (07) :751-784
[8]   RADIOVISIOGRAPHY - AN INITIAL EVALUATION [J].
HORNER, K ;
SHEARER, AC ;
WALKER, A ;
WILSON, NHF .
BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL, 1990, 168 (06) :244-248
[9]   DIGITAL IMAGE-PROCESSING - EFFECT ON DETECTABILITY OF SIMULATED LOW-CONTRAST RADIOGRAPHIC PATTERNS [J].
ISHIDA, M ;
DOI, K ;
LOO, LN ;
METZ, CE ;
LEHR, JL .
RADIOLOGY, 1984, 150 (02) :569-575
[10]   Diagnostic accuracy of direct digital dental radiography for the detection of periapical bone lesions .2. Effects on diagnostic accuracy after application of image processing [J].
Kullendorff, B ;
Nilsson, M .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTOLOGY, 1996, 82 (05) :585-589