Imidacloprid and chlorpyrifos insecticides impair migratory ability in a seed-eating songbird

被引:135
作者
Eng, Margaret L. [1 ]
Stutchbury, Bridget J. M. [2 ]
Morrissey, Christy A. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Saskatchewan, Toxicol Ctr, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5B3, Canada
[2] York Univ, Dept Biol, Toronto, ON M3J 1P3, Canada
[3] Univ Saskatchewan, Dept Biol, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5E2, Canada
[4] Univ Saskatchewan, Sch Environm & Sustainabil, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5C8, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
RISK-ASSESSMENT; COLUMBA-LIVIA; BIRDS; ORIENTATION; BIODIVERSITY; CONSUMPTION; PARTRIDGES; PESTICIDES; NAVIGATION; CARCASSES;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-017-15446-x
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Birds that travel long distances between their wintering and breeding grounds may be particularly susceptible to neurotoxic insecticides, but the influence of insecticides on migration ability is poorly understood. Following acute exposure to two widely used agricultural insecticides, imidacloprid (neonicotinoid) and chlorpyrifos (organophosphate), we compared effects on body mass, migratory activity and orientation in a seed-eating bird, the white-crowned sparrow (Zonotrichia leucophrys). During spring migration, sparrows were captured, held and dosed by gavage daily for 3 days with either the vehicle control, low (10% LD50) or high (25% LD50) doses of imidacloprid or chlorpyrifos and tested in migratory orientation trials pre-exposure, post-exposure and during recovery. Control birds maintained body mass and a seasonally appropriate northward orientation throughout the experiment. Imidacloprid dosed birds exhibited significant declines in fat stores and body mass (mean loss: -17% low, -25% high dose) and failed to orient correctly. Chlorpyrifos had no overt effects on mass but significantly impaired orientation. These results suggest that wild songbirds consuming the equivalent of just four imidacloprid-treated canola seeds or eight chlorpyrifos granules per day over 3 days could suffer impaired condition, migration delays and improper migratory direction, which could lead to increased risk of mortality or lost breeding opportunity.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 55 条
[41]   ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AFFECT THE BEHAVIOR OF CAPTIVE, MIGRATORY WHITE-CROWNED SPARROWS [J].
Ramenofsky, Marilyn ;
Agatsuma, Renee ;
Ramfar, Trisha .
CONDOR, 2008, 110 (04) :658-671
[42]   Migratory sleeplessness in the white-crowned sparrow (Zonotrichia leucophrys gambelii) [J].
Rattenborg, NC ;
Mandt, BH ;
Obermeyer, WH ;
Winsauer, PJ ;
Huber, R ;
Wikelski, M ;
Benca, RM .
PLOS BIOLOGY, 2004, 2 (07) :924-936
[43]  
SERA, 2005, IM HUM HLTH EC RISK
[44]   Food Availability Affects Circadian Clock-Controlled Activity and Zugunruhe in the Night Migratory Male Blackheaded Bunting (Emberiza melanocephala) [J].
Singh, Jyoti ;
Rastogi, Ashutosh ;
Rani, Sangeeta ;
Kumar, Vinod .
CHRONOBIOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 29 (01) :15-U36
[45]   What to do when stopping over: behavioral decisions of a migrating songbird during stopover are dictated by initial change in their body condition and mediated by key environmental conditions [J].
Smith, Adam D. ;
McWilliams, Scott R. .
BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY, 2014, 25 (06) :1423-1435
[46]   Arrival timing and seasonal reproductive performance in a long-distance migratory landbird [J].
Smith, RJ ;
Moore, FR .
BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY AND SOCIOBIOLOGY, 2005, 57 (03) :231-239
[47]   Chlorpyrifos: Ecotoxicological risk assessment for birds and mammals in corn agroecosystems [J].
Solomon, KR ;
Giesy, JP ;
Kendall, RJ ;
Best, LB ;
Coats, JR ;
Dixon, KR ;
Hooper, MJ ;
Kenaga, EE ;
McMurry, ST .
HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT, 2001, 7 (03) :497-632
[48]  
Stafford T. R., 1991, 101324 MOB CORP
[49]   Neonicotinoid insecticide toxicology: Mechanisms of selective action [J].
Tomizawa, M ;
Casida, JE .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PHARMACOLOGY AND TOXICOLOGY, 2005, 45 :247-+
[50]   Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity - ecosystem service management [J].
Tscharntke, T ;
Klein, AM ;
Kruess, A ;
Steffan-Dewenter, I ;
Thies, C .
ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2005, 8 (08) :857-874