Organizational Structure from Interaction: Evidence from Corporate Sustainability Efforts

被引:83
作者
Soderstrom, Sara B. [1 ,2 ]
Weber, Klaus [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Org Studies, 825 Weiser Hall,500 Church St, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Program Environm, 825 Weiser Hall,500 Church St, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[3] Northwestern Univ, Kellogg Sch Management, Management & Org, 2211 Campus, Evanston, IL 60208 USA
关键词
organizational change; structuration process; sustainability initiatives; social interaction dynamics; INFORMATION-TECHNOLOGY; SOCIAL ACTIVISM; CONSTRUCTION; INSTITUTIONS; STRATEGY; MODEL; PERFORMANCE; PATTERNS; ROUTINES; BUSINESS;
D O I
10.1177/0001839219836670
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We advance interactionist perspectives on how organizational structures emerge in new issue domains. Our study is grounded in field data collected over 18 months at a large biomedical company that sought to become more sustainable. Over that period, some sustainability-related issues became firmly embedded in formal structures and procedures, while others faltered. We identify the quality of situational interactions among organizational members as the engine behind the structuring of organizational sustainability efforts. Successful interactions generated traces of attention, motivation, knowledge, relationships, and resources that linked fleeting interactions to emergent organizational structures. Our findings point to the importance of internal advocates and distributed processes at middle and lower levels for developing organizational structures, and we show that advocates' interests, commitments, and identities are altered in the course of repeated interactions, as are the political resources available to them. Paying attention to situation-level interactions thus results in a more dynamic view of the emergence of formal structures through political processes. We develop a process model that informs structuration perspectives on organizational change by showing how social interaction dynamics can account for divergent levels of structuring within the same domain. The model also advances political perspectives on organizational change by unpacking the situational underpinnings of advocacy efforts and collective mobilization around issues.
引用
收藏
页码:226 / 271
页数:46
相关论文
共 100 条
[1]   On Corporate Social Responsibility, Sensemaking, and the Search for Meaningfulness Through Work [J].
Aguinis, Herman ;
Glavas, Ante .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2019, 45 (03) :1057-1086
[2]   Cultural pragmatics: Social performance between ritual and strategy [J].
Alexander, JC .
SOCIOLOGICAL THEORY, 2004, 22 (04) :527-573
[3]   Organizational Susceptibility to Institutional Complexity: Critical Events Driving the Adoption and Implementation of the Ethics and Compliance Officer Position [J].
不详 .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2014, 25 (06) :1722-1743
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2003, Ustroyeniye obshchestva: Ocherk teorii strukturatsii
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1995, Sensemaking in Organizations
[6]   From issues to actions: The importance of individual concerns and organizational values in responding to natural environmental issues [J].
Bansal, P .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2003, 14 (05) :510-527
[8]   THE ALIGNMENT OF TECHNOLOGY AND STRUCTURE THROUGH ROLES AND NETWORKS [J].
BARLEY, SR .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1990, 35 (01) :61-103
[9]   Institutionalization and structuration: Studying the links between action and institution [J].
Barley, SR ;
Tolbert, PS .
ORGANIZATION STUDIES, 1997, 18 (01) :93-117
[10]  
Binder AmyJ., 2002, CONTENTIOUS CURRICUL