Reproducibility of apparent diffusion coefficient measurements evaluated with different workstations

被引:4
作者
Fanariotis, M. [1 ,3 ]
Vassiou, K. [1 ]
Tsougos, I. [2 ]
Fezoulidis, I. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Thessaly, Diagnost Radiol Dept, Biopolis, Larisa 41110, Greece
[2] Univ Thessaly, Med Phys Dept, Biopolis, Larisa 41110, Greece
[3] Sykehuset Telemark HF, Dept Radiol, Ulefossvegen 55, N-3710 Skien, Telemark, Norway
关键词
MALIGNANT BREAST-LESIONS; MAGNETIC-RESONANCE; VALUES; MRI; QUANTIFICATION; VARIABILITY; MAMMOGRAPHY; POPULATION; DIAGNOSIS; BENIGN;
D O I
10.1016/j.crad.2017.08.009
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
AIM: To evaluate apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements of breast lesions on different computer platforms to address post-processing influences on ADC measurement reproducibility. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred biopsy-proven breast lesions were included in this prospective study. MRI examination was performed at 3 T using standard sequences and an echo planar diffusion-weighted imaging sequence with b-values of 0 and 850 s/mm(2). The images were reviewed by two radiologists in consensus. Regions of interest were placed manually within the lesion, following its contour. Care was taken to exclude adjacent normal tissue or necrotic tissue and cystic components within the lesion. The mean ADC value was measured for each lesion on two different platforms: On the MRI workstation that came with the scanner and on a commercially available DICOM (digital imaging and communication in medicine) viewer. Agreement between workstation measurements was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman plots. RESULTS: Fifty-nine malignant and 41 benign lesions were analysed. Of the benign lesions, 28 were mass lesions and 13 were non-mass-like enhancements. In addition, 46 of the malignant lesions were masses and 13 were non-mass-like enhancements. Agreement between the two workstation measurements was high (intraclass correlation coefficients = 0.981). Using Bland eAltman plots, no systematic differences were identified between workstations. Limits of agreement ranged between a minimum of -0.071 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s and a maximum of 0.102 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s. CONCLUSION: ADC measurements are reproducible among the workstations considered in this study. (C) 2017 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:141 / 148
页数:8
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   MRI of the Breast as Part of the Assessment in Population-Based Mammography Screening [J].
Bick, U. ;
Engelken, F. ;
Diederichs, G. ;
Dzyuballa, R. ;
Ortmann, M. ;
Fallenberg, E. M. .
ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 2013, 185 (09) :849-856
[2]   Diffusion-weighted MR for Differentiation of Breast Lesions at 3.0 T: How Does Selection of Diffusion Protocols Affect Diagnosis? [J].
Bogner, Wolfgang ;
Gruber, Stephan ;
Pinker, Katja ;
Grabner, Guenther ;
Stadlbauer, Andreas ;
Weber, Michael ;
Moser, Ewald ;
Helbich, Thomas H. ;
Trattnig, Siegfried .
RADIOLOGY, 2009, 253 (02) :341-351
[3]   Fat saturation in dynamic breast MRI at 3 Tesla: is the Dixon technique superior to spectral fat saturation? A visual grading characteristics study [J].
Clauser, P. ;
Pinker, K. ;
Helbich, T. H. ;
Kapetas, P. ;
Bernathova, M. ;
Baltzer, P. A. T. .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2014, 24 (09) :2213-2219
[4]  
Clauser P, 2015, EUR RADIOL, P1
[5]   Accuracy of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Value Measurement on PACS Workstation: A Comparative Analysis [J].
El Kady, Reem M. ;
Choudhary, Arabinda Kumar ;
Tappouni, Rafel .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2011, 196 (03) :W280-W284
[6]   Assessment and quantification of sources of variability in breast apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements at diffusion weighted imaging [J].
Giannotti, E. ;
Waugh, S. ;
Priba, L. ;
Davis, Z. ;
Crowe, E. ;
Vinnicombe, S. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2015, 84 (09) :1729-1736
[7]   Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of Breast Masses: Comparison of Diagnostic Performance Using Various Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Parameters [J].
Hirano, Maki ;
Satake, Hiroko ;
Ishigaki, Satoko ;
Ikeda, Mitsuru ;
Kawai, Hisashi ;
Naganawa, Shinji .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2012, 198 (03) :717-722
[8]   Benign and malignant breast lesions: Diagnosis with multiparametric MR imaging [J].
Jacobs, MA ;
Barker, PB ;
Bluemke, DA ;
Maranto, C ;
Arnold, C ;
Herskovits, EH ;
Bhujwalla, Z .
RADIOLOGY, 2003, 229 (01) :225-232
[9]   Screening with magnetic resonance imaging and mammography of a UK population at high familial risk of breast cancer: a prospective multicentre cohort study (MARIBS) [J].
Leach, MO ;
Boggis, CRM ;
Dixon, AK ;
Easton, DF ;
Eeles, RA ;
Evans, DGR ;
Gilbert, FF ;
Griebsch, I ;
Hoff, RJC ;
Kessar, P ;
Lakhani, SR ;
Moss, SM ;
Nerurkar, A ;
Padhani, AR ;
Pointon, LJ ;
Thompson, D ;
Warren, RML .
LANCET, 2005, 365 (9473) :1769-1778
[10]  
LeBihan D, 1995, NMR BIOMED, V8, P375, DOI 10.1002/nbm.1940080711