Optimum filter bandwidths for optically preamplified NRZ receivers

被引:122
作者
Winzer, PJ
Pfennigbauer, M
Strasser, MM
Leeb, WR
机构
[1] Bell Labs, Lucent Technol, Holmdel, NJ 07733 USA
[2] Tech Univ Vienna, Inst Nachrichtentech & Hochfrequenztech, A-1050 Vienna, Austria
基金
奥地利科学基金会;
关键词
chirp; extinction ratio; frequency control; intersymbol interference (ISI); non-return-to-zero (NRZ); optical amplifiers; optical filters; return-to-zero (RZ); sensitivity;
D O I
10.1109/50.948273
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
We present a comprehensive treatment of optically preamplified direct detection receivers for non-return-to-zero (NRZ) and return-to-zero (RZ) on/off keying modulation, taking into account the influence of different (N)RZ optical pulse shapes, specified at the receiver input, and filter transfer functions; optical Fabry-Perot filters (FPFs) and Bragg gratings as well as electrical fifth-order Bessel and first-order RC low-pass filters are considered. We determine optimum optical and electrical filter bandwidths and analyze the impact of bandwidth deviations on receiver sensitivity. Optimum receiver performance relies on a balance between noise and intersymbol interference (ISI) for NRZ transmission, while for RZ reception detection noise has to be traded against filter-induced signal energy rejection. Both for NRZ and 33% duty cycle RZ, optical filter bandwidths of around twice the data rate are found to be optimum. Receivers using RZ coding are shown to closely approach the quantum limit, and thus to outperform NRZ-based systems by several decibels. We further analyze the impact of important degrading effects on receiver sensitivity and optimum receiver bandwidths, including receiver noise, finite extinction ratio, chirp, and optical carrier frequency (or optical filter center frequency) fluctuations.
引用
收藏
页码:1263 / 1273
页数:11
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1996, OPTICAL FIBER COMMUN
[2]  
ATIA W, 1999, P 12 ANN M LEOS, P2244
[3]   PERFORMANCE BOUNDS AND CUTOFF RATES OF QUANTUM LIMITED OOK WITH OPTICAL AMPLIFICATION [J].
BENELI, D ;
DALLAL, YE ;
SHAMAI, S .
IEEE JOURNAL ON SELECTED AREAS IN COMMUNICATIONS, 1995, 13 (03) :510-530
[4]   Receiver sensitivity improvement by impulsive coding [J].
Boivin, L ;
Nuss, MC ;
Shah, J ;
Miller, DAB ;
Haus, HA .
IEEE PHOTONICS TECHNOLOGY LETTERS, 1997, 9 (05) :684-686
[5]  
BOLVIN L, 1999, P OPT AMPL THEIR APP, P106
[6]   Phase reconstruction from reflectivity in fiber Bragg gratings [J].
Carballar, A ;
Muriel, MA .
JOURNAL OF LIGHTWAVE TECHNOLOGY, 1997, 15 (08) :1314-1322
[7]   Comparison of effective α-parameters for semiconductor Mach-Zehnder optical modulators [J].
Cartledge, JC .
JOURNAL OF LIGHTWAVE TECHNOLOGY, 1998, 16 (03) :372-379
[8]   ERROR-RATE PERFORMANCE OF OPTICAL AMPLIFIERS WITH FABRY-PEROT FILTERS [J].
CHINN, SR .
ELECTRONICS LETTERS, 1995, 31 (09) :756-757
[9]   DETAILED NOISE STATISTICS FOR AN OPTICALLY PREAMPLIFIED DIRECT-DETECTION RECEIVER [J].
DANIELSEN, SL ;
MIKKELSEN, B ;
DURHUUS, T ;
JOERGENSEN, C ;
STUBKJAER, KE .
JOURNAL OF LIGHTWAVE TECHNOLOGY, 1995, 13 (05) :977-981
[10]  
DESURVIRE E, 1994, ERBIUM DOPED FIBER A