A Review of the Perspectives of Social Justice with Special Reference to the Ambedkarism

被引:0
作者
Hantal, Bhimasen [1 ]
机构
[1] Yantra India Ltd YIL, Ordnance Factories Inst Learning Ambajhari OFILAJ, Minist Def, Dept Def Prod, Nagpur 442001, Maharashtra, India
关键词
Discrimination; human rights; equality; inclusion; oppression; perspectives of justice; social change; social justice;
D O I
10.1177/2455328X221076623
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
The social justice is very old concept, which germinated at its mature forms during the era of Gautam Buddha, Plato and Aristotle, and started continual academic and sociopolitical refinements over the centuries through rich contributions of many Kings, Queens, Social Workers, Scholars and so. The concept social justice as always been placed at prominent places by the academic community whether discussing of the colonialism, globalism, communism or so on. Karl Marx has ignited again the notion of social justice among the intellectuals. After WWII, most of the nations got independence, and thus significance of the social justice increased manifold than ever before-to see that how far these countries deliver justice to the marginal communities at their territories, since they are no more under the clutch of their erstwhile colonial masters. Thus, during the entire periods starting from Plato to Rawals and beyond many scholars have contributed through various perspectives on the issue of justice. The major theories have been grouped here as various perspectives and briefly reviewed, while emphasizing previously somehow neglected Ambedkarism, as author found that this ideology could be even more relevant and practical in the modern context of globalization.
引用
收藏
页码:361 / 373
页数:13
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
Ambedkar B.R., 1994, Dr Babasaheb Ambedkar Writings and Speeches, V13
[2]  
Ambedkar Bhimrao Ramji., 1979, Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar: Writings and Speeches, V1
[3]  
Ambedkar Bhimrao Ramji, 1987, Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar: Writings and Speeches, V3
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1859, A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy
[5]  
Barker, 1957, POLITICAL THOUGHT PL
[6]  
Bradley, 1935, ETHICAL STUDIES
[7]  
Brecht Arnold., 1970, POLITICAL ED ARNOLD
[8]  
Gajendragadkar P.B., 1965, LAW LIBERTY SOCIAL J
[9]  
Gore, 1997, SOCIAL CONTEST IDEOL
[10]  
Hantal, 2011, SOCIAL TRANSFORMATIO