How firms select environmental behaviours in China: The framework of environmental motivations and performance

被引:26
作者
Cheng, Hongwei [1 ]
Hu, Xuming [1 ]
Zhou, Rui [1 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, Business Sch, Wangjiang Campus,24 South Sect 1,Yihuan Rd, Chengdu 610065, Sichuan, Peoples R China
关键词
Environmental motivations; Environmental behaviour; Eco-efficiency view; RESOURCE-BASED VIEW; FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE; BUSINESS PERFORMANCE; MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS; CORPORATE SUSTAINABILITY; ECO-EFFICIENCY; INNOVATION; IMPACT; CHALLENGES; ISSUES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.096
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Despite previous findings devoted to the relationship between the environment and performance, limitations have been identified regarding the impact of environmental motivations and behaviours. This study investigated production behaviour (the development of environment-friendly production) and accounting behaviour (the tracking of environmental costs) to examine the connection between environmental motivations and behaviours as well as to explain the effects on environmental management systems and financial performance. Using survey data from 253 Chinese manufacturing firms, the results revealed that sustainable environmental motivations produced more environmental behaviours, but business-oriented environmental motivations inhibited such behaviours, and sustainable firms were more concerned about production, while business-oriented firms were more focused on the accounting process. Furthermore, environmental motivations and behaviours can affect firms' environmental management systems and thereby generate high financial performance. This study advances environmental motivation-behaviour theory and eco-efficiency research and provides recommendations for management practices. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:132 / 141
页数:10
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]   The role of management accounting practices as facilitators of the environmental management Evidence from EMAS organisations [J].
Albelda, Esther .
SUSTAINABILITY ACCOUNTING MANAGEMENT AND POLICY JOURNAL, 2011, 2 (01) :76-100
[2]   STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE - A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED 2-STEP APPROACH [J].
ANDERSON, JC ;
GERBING, DW .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1988, 103 (03) :411-423
[3]  
Angell LC, 1999, J OPER MANAG, V17, P575, DOI 10.1016/S0272-6963(99)00006-6
[4]   Why companies go green: A model of ecological responsiveness [J].
Bansal, P ;
Roth, K .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2000, 43 (04) :717-736
[5]   PRACTICAL ISSUES IN STRUCTURAL MODELING [J].
BENTLER, PM ;
CHOU, CP .
SOCIOLOGICAL METHODS & RESEARCH, 1987, 16 (01) :78-117
[6]   Ecoefficiency: Defining a role for environmental cost management [J].
Burnett, Royce D. ;
Hansen, Don R. .
ACCOUNTING ORGANIZATIONS AND SOCIETY, 2008, 33 (06) :551-581
[7]   The drivers of eco-innovation and its impact on performance: Evidence from China [J].
Cai, Wugan ;
Li, Guangpei .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 176 :110-118
[8]   Cost data quality considerations for eco-efficiency measures [J].
Ciroth, Andreas .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2009, 68 (06) :1583-1590
[9]  
Coglianese C., 2001, Regulating from the Inside: Can Environmental Management Systems Achieve Policy Goals?
[10]   A natural resource-based view of climate change: Innovation challenges in the automobile industry [J].
Cristina De Stefano, M. ;
Montes-Sancho, Maria J. ;
Busch, Timo .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2016, 139 :1436-1448