Clinical application of a new colonoscope with variable insertion tube rigidity: a pilot study

被引:19
作者
Sorbi, D
Schleck, CD
Zinsmeister, AR
Gostout, CJ
机构
[1] Mayo Clin & Mayo Fdn, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Dev Endoscopy Unit, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[2] Mayo Clin & Mayo Fdn, Biostat Sect, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1067/mge.2001.114056
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Colonic loop formation can prolong colonoscopy, increase patient discomfort, and preclude complete examination. A colonoscope with variable insertion tube rigidity may facilitate colonoscopy, Our aim was to determine whether the use of a colonoscope with variable insertion tube rigidity reduces insertion time and improves patient acceptance of colonoscopy. Methods: Fifty patients were randomly assigned to undergo colonoscopy with a conventional colonoscope or a variable rigidity colonoscope (VRC). Patient acceptance, dosage of medication, use of abdominal pressure, and patient repositioning were assessed. Statistical analysis was performed by the P-sample Wilcoxon rank sum test and an extension of Fisher exact test. Results: The groups were comparable with respect to age, gender, and medications required during colonoscopy. The cecum was reached in all 25 patients who underwent colonoscopy with the VRC, including 1 patient in whom the cecum was not reached at a previous colonoscopy with a conventional instrument. In the conventional colonoscopy group, the cecum was not reached in 4 patients (2 poor preparation, 2 loop formation). There was no significant difference between the 2 groups with respect to insertion time. In the group that underwent colonoscopy with the variable rigidity instrument, less abdominal pressure was required (p = 0.05), and nursing assessment of patient discomfort was more favorable (p = 0.05). There were no complications and no significant differences in the intubation time to cecum or in repositioning, patient acceptance, or patient assessment of abdominal pain. Conclusion: The use of a variable rigidity colonoscope reduced the frequency of abdominal pressure but did not affect intubation time to cecum, repositioning, patient acceptance, or patient assessment of abdominal pain.
引用
收藏
页码:638 / 642
页数:5
相关论文
共 8 条
[1]  
Brooker JC, 1999, GASTROINTEST ENDOSC, V49, pAB152
[2]  
Cotton P., 1996, Practical Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, V4th ed.
[3]   EXACT SIGNIFICANCE TESTING TO ESTABLISH TREATMENT EQUIVALENCE WITH ORDERED CATEGORICAL-DATA [J].
MEHTA, CR ;
PATEL, NR ;
TSIATIS, AA .
BIOMETRICS, 1984, 40 (03) :819-825
[4]  
SHABMIR M, 1980, GASTROINTEST ENDOSC, V26, P86
[5]   ENDOSCOPIC COMPLICATIONS - RESULTS OF 1974 AMERICAN-SOCIETY-FOR-GASTROINTESTINAL-ENDOSCOPY SURVEY [J].
SILVIS, SE ;
NEBEL, O ;
ROGERS, G ;
SUGAWA, C ;
MANDELSTAM, P .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1976, 235 (09) :928-930
[6]  
Sorbi D, 1999, GASTROINTEST ENDOSC, V49, pAB159
[7]  
Waye J D, 1996, Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am, V6, P343
[8]   THE TECHNIQUE OF ABDOMINAL PRESSURE IN TOTAL COLONOSCOPY [J].
WAYE, JD ;
YESSAYAN, SA ;
LEWIS, BS ;
FABRY, TL .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1991, 37 (02) :147-151