Social Innovation: The Promise and the Reality in Marginalised Rural Areas in Europe

被引:7
作者
Slee, Bill [1 ,2 ]
Lukesch, Robert [3 ]
Ravazzoli, Elisa [4 ]
机构
[1] James Hutton Inst, Social Econ & Geog Sci, Aberdeen AB15 8QH, Scotland
[2] Rural Dev Co, 4 Manse Lane Tannadice, Forfar DD8 3TA, Scotland
[3] OAR GmbH, Lindengasse 56, A-1070 Vienna, Austria
[4] Eurac Res, Inst Reg Dev, Viale Druso 1, I-39100 Bolzano, Italy
来源
WORLD | 2022年 / 3卷 / 02期
关键词
social innovation; rural development; Europe; policy; marginalised areas; GOVERNANCE; POLITICS;
D O I
10.3390/world3020013
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In this paper, we explore the idea of social innovation as both a conceptual and practical means of delivering positive social, economic and environmental outcomes in marginal rural areas. Definitions are critically appraised, and the dual contemporary origins of the term social innovation (in management sciences and critical social science) are explored. There has been much conceptual confusion, in particular about the extent to which civil society agency is central or desirable in social innovation. Social innovation can be seen to be closely connected to a range of theories that inform both innovation and rural development, but it lacks a singular theoretical "home". Social innovation can also have a dark side, which merits scrutiny. Three case studies illustrate social innovation processes and outcomes in different parts of Europe. Where committed actors, local enabling agency and overarching policies align, the outcomes of social innovations can be considerable. If rarely transformational, social innovation has shown itself capable of delivering positive socioeconomic and environmental outcomes in more bounded spatial settings. It seems questionable whether social innovation will survive as an organising and capacity-building concept alongside more established principles, such as community-led local development, which, although not exactly social innovation, is very similar and already firmly embedded in policy guidance or whether it will be replaced by new equally fuzzy ideas, such as the smart village approach.
引用
收藏
页码:237 / 259
页数:23
相关论文
共 77 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2018, Oslo Manual 2018: Guidelines for Collecting, Reporting and Using Data on Innovation, V4th, DOI DOI 10.1787/9789264304604-EN
[2]   Transformative social innovation and (dis)empowerment [J].
Avelino, Flor ;
Wittmayer, Julia M. ;
Pel, Bonno ;
Weaver, Paul ;
Dumitru, Adina ;
Haxeltine, Alex ;
Kemp, Rene ;
Jorgensen, Michael S. ;
Bauler, Tom ;
Ruijsink, Saskia ;
O'Riordan, Tim .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2019, 145 :195-206
[3]   The politics of sustainability transitions [J].
Avelino, Flor ;
Grin, John ;
Pel, Bonno ;
Jhagroe, Shivant .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY & PLANNING, 2016, 18 (05) :557-567
[4]   How Social Innovation 'Came to Be': Tracing the Evolution of a Contested Concept [J].
Ayob, Noorseha ;
Teasdale, Simon ;
Fagan, Kylie .
JOURNAL OF SOCIAL POLICY, 2016, 45 (04) :635-653
[5]  
Barca F., 2009, An Agenda for a Reformed Cohesion Policy: A Place-Based Approach to Meeting European Union Challenges and Expectations
[6]  
Barosso M., Employment, Social Affairs & Inclusion
[7]   The governance of sociotechnical transformations to sustainability [J].
Beck, Silke ;
Jasanoff, Sheila ;
Stirling, Andy ;
Polzin, Christine .
CURRENT OPINION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 49 :143-152
[8]   How social capital is leveraged in social innovations under resource constraints? [J].
Bhatt, Punita ;
Altinay, Levent .
MANAGEMENT DECISION, 2013, 51 (09) :1772-1792
[9]   New clean energy communities in polycentric settings: Four avenues for future research [J].
Blasch, J. ;
van der Grijp, N. M. ;
Petrovics, D. ;
Palm, J. ;
Bocken, N. ;
Darby, S. J. ;
Barnes, J. ;
Hansen, P. ;
Kamin, T. ;
Golob, U. ;
Andor, M. ;
Sommer, S. ;
Nicita, A. ;
Musolino, M. ;
Mlinaric, M. .
ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2021, 82
[10]  
Bontron J.C., 1999, General Report