Portfolio Selection Methodology for a Nuclear Project

被引:8
作者
Strang, Kenneth David [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] APPC Int Market Res, Long Isl City, NY USA
[2] SUNY, New York, NY USA
[3] Univ Technol Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia
[4] Telstra Learning In Business Ctr, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
portfolio selection and evaluation; project management; nuclear tritium; mixed methods; multicriteria decision making; analytical hierarchy process; RESOURCE-ALLOCATION; AHP; DECISION; SYSTEM; MODEL; QFD;
D O I
10.1002/pmj.20212
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
It is difficult to evaluate complex, publicly sensitive nuclear project proposals. Scientists, subject matter experts, politicians, and citizens often differ on scope, budget, time, and quality priorities. There are numerous qualitative factors and quantitative variables. Experts could widely disagree on criteria or neglect to discriminate between seemingly identical alternatives. An ineffective portfolio selection method could lead to safety problems, budget overruns, or outright project failures. This case study develops and examines a mixed-method, integrated qualitative and quantitative portfolio selection model, applied to a "tritium extraction facility" project concept.
引用
收藏
页码:81 / 93
页数:13
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]  
Akao Y., 2003, International Journal of Quality Reliability Management, V20, P20, DOI 10.1108/02656710310453791
[2]   An investigation of factors affecting how engineers and scientists seek information [J].
Anderson, CJ ;
Glassman, M ;
McAfee, RB ;
Pinelli, T .
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 2001, 18 (02) :131-155
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2003, PRODUCT DESIGN DEV
[4]  
[Anonymous], INQUIRY PARTICIPATIO
[5]  
[Anonymous], AACE INT T
[6]  
[Anonymous], FED REG
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2008, A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide), V4th
[8]  
[Anonymous], IND MANAGEMENT DATA
[9]  
[Anonymous], OTTAWA CITIZEN 1221
[10]  
[Anonymous], HARVARD BUSINESS REV