Impact of knowledge-based capital on firm productivity: The contingent effect of ownership

被引:10
作者
He, Qiuqin [1 ]
Guijarro-Garcia, Maria [2 ]
Costa-Climent, Juan [3 ]
机构
[1] Hangzhou Normal Univ, Sch Econ, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] ESIC Business & Mkt Sch, Valencia, Spain
[3] EY, Valencia, Spain
关键词
Knowledge-based capital; Subcategory; Firm productivity; Ownership; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; INTANGIBLE INVESTMENT; DEVELOPMENT INTENSITY; PERFORMANCE; INNOVATION; ASSETS; INTERNATIONALIZATION; ADVANTAGE; RESOURCES; ECONOMY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.11.088
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Using account data from an unbalanced panel of Chinese listed companies from 2013 to 2018, this study examines the productivity effect of knowledge-based capital (KBC) and its three subcategories, which include computerised information, innovative property, and economic competency, as well as the contingent effects of ownership. Our findings show that first KBC has a positive effect on firm productivity and that only computerised information and economic competency contribute significantly to firm productivity among the subcategories. Second, KBC's productivity gains are linked to firm ownership. KBC utilisation in SOEs is less efficient than in private firms, and computerised information only affects the productivity of SOEs. Third, across different samples, the most significant effect is generated by economic competency, which is primarily driven by organisational capital and brand equity, but this is not robust in SOEs. The findings highlight the importance of carefully assessing the productivity-enhancing effects of various KBC items.
引用
收藏
页码:85 / 94
页数:10
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]   Measuring brand equity across products and markets [J].
Aaker, DA .
CALIFORNIA MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1996, 38 (03) :102-&
[2]   Innovation and productivity in services and manufacturing: the role of ICT [J].
Aboal, Diego ;
Tacsir, Ezequiel .
INDUSTRIAL AND CORPORATE CHANGE, 2018, 27 (02) :221-241
[3]   Knowledge-based HR Practices and Innovation in SMEs [J].
Al-Tal, Mohammad Jaber Yousef ;
Emeagwali, Okechukwu Lawrence .
ORGANIZACIJA, 2019, 52 (01) :6-21
[4]   Complementarities in innovation strategy: do intangibles play a role in enhancing firm performance? [J].
Anon Higon, Dolores ;
Gomez, Jaime ;
Vargas, Pilar .
INDUSTRIAL AND CORPORATE CHANGE, 2017, 26 (05) :865-886
[5]   Intangible assets and firm heterogeneity: Evidence from Italy [J].
Arrighetti, Alessandro ;
Landini, Fabio ;
Lasagni, Andrea .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2014, 43 (01) :202-213
[6]   FIRM RESOURCES AND SUSTAINED COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE [J].
BARNEY, J .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 1991, 17 (01) :99-120
[7]   On micro-foundations of dynamic capabilities: A multi-level perspective based on CEO personality and knowledge-based capital [J].
Bendig, David ;
Strese, Steffen ;
Flatten, Tessa C. ;
da Costa, Maika Eva Susanne ;
Brettel, Malte .
LONG RANGE PLANNING, 2018, 51 (06) :797-814
[8]   Intangible capital and productivity at the firm level: a panel data assessment [J].
Bontempi, Maria Elena ;
Mairesse, Jacques .
ECONOMICS OF INNOVATION AND NEW TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 24 (1-2) :22-51
[9]  
Brynjolfsson E, 2002, BROOKINGS PAP ECO AC, P137
[10]   The Productivity J-Curve: How Intangibles Complement General Purpose Technologies [J].
Brynjolfsson, Erik ;
Rock, Daniel ;
Syverson, Chad .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL-MACROECONOMICS, 2021, 13 (01) :333-372