Assessment of Cardiac Masses by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Histological Correlation and Clinical Outcomes

被引:71
|
作者
Mousavi, Negareh [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Cheezum, Michael K. [2 ,3 ]
Aghayev, Ayaz [2 ,3 ]
Padera, Robert [4 ]
Vita, Tomas [2 ,3 ]
Steigner, Michael [2 ,3 ]
Hulten, Edward [2 ,3 ]
Bittencourt, Marcio Sommer [5 ]
Dorbala, Sharmila [2 ,3 ]
Di Carli, Marcelo F. [2 ,3 ]
Kwong, Raymond Y. [2 ,3 ]
Dunne, Ruth [2 ,3 ]
Blankstein, Ron [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ Hlth Ctr, Cardiovasc Div, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[2] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Div Cardiovasc, Cardiovasc Imaging Program, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Radiol, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Pathol, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[5] Fac Israelita Ciencias Saude Albert Einstein, Sao Paulo, Brazil
来源
关键词
benign; magnetic resonance imaging; malignant; outcome; tumor; TUMORS; MORTALITY; SURVIVAL; FEATURES;
D O I
10.1161/JAHA.117.007829
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background-Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) provides useful information for characterizing cardiac masses, but there are limited data on whether CMR can accurately distinguish benign from malignant lesions. We aimed to describe the distribution and imaging characteristics of cardiac masses identified by CMR and to determine the diagnostic accuracy of CMR for distinguishing benign from malignant tumors. Methods and Results-We examined consecutive patients referred for CMR between May 2008 and August 2013 to identify those with a cardiac mass. In patients for whom there was histological correlation, 2 investigators blinded to all data analyzed the CMR images to categorize the mass as benign or malignant. For benign masses, readers were also asked to specify the most likely diagnosis. Benign masses were defined as benign neoplastic or non-neoplastic. Malignant masses were defined as primary cardiac or metastatic. Of 8069 patients (mean age: 58 +/- 16 years; 55% female) undergoing CMR, 145 (1.8%) had a cardiac mass. In most cases (142, 98%), there was a known cardiac mass before the CMR study. Among 145 patients with a cardiac mass, 93 (64%) had a known history of malignancy. Among 53 cases that had histological correlation, 25 (47%) were benign, 26 (49%) were metastatic, and 2 (4%) were malignant primary cardiac masses. Blinded readers correctly diagnosed 89% to 94% of the cases as benign versus malignant, with a 95% agreement rate (kappa=0.83). Conclusions-Although CMR can be highly effective in distinguishing benign from malignant lesions, pathology remains the gold standard in accurately determining the type of mass.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Assessment of Cardiac Function by Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    M.A. Fogel
    Pediatric Cardiology, 2000, 21 : 59 - 69
  • [22] Magnetic resonance imaging assessment of cardiac function
    W. Gregory Hundley
    Craig A. Hamilton
    Pairoj Rerkpattanapipat
    Current Cardiology Reports, 2003, 5 (1) : 69 - 74
  • [23] Cardiac Functional Assessment by Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Jiang, Mengdi
    Lu, Minjie
    Zhao, Shihua
    CARDIOLOGY DISCOVERY, 2024, 4 (04): : 284 - 299
  • [24] Clinical and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging characteristics of cardiac amyloidosis of cardiac amyloidosis
    Zeng, Lijin
    Chen, Zhibin
    Wu, Jingguo
    Yang, Wen
    Li, Zhenyu
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2015, 66 (16) : C219 - C220
  • [25] Accuracy of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Diagnosing Pediatric Cardiac Masses A Multicenter Study
    Beroukhim, Rebecca S.
    Ghelani, Sunil
    Ashwath, Ravi
    Balasubramanian, Sowmya
    Biko, David M.
    Buddhe, Sujatha
    Campbell, M. Jay
    Cross, Russell
    Festa, Pierluigi
    Griffin, Lindsay
    Grotenhuis, Heynric
    Hasbani, Keren
    Hashemi, Sassan
    Hegde, Sanjeet
    Hussain, Tarique
    Jain, Supriya
    Kiaffas, Maria
    Kutty, Shelby
    Lam, Christopher Z.
    Liberato, Gabriela
    Merlocco, Anthony
    Misra, Nilanjana
    Mowers, Katie L.
    Muniz, Juan Carlos
    Nutting, Arni
    Parra, David A.
    Patel, Jyoti K.
    Perez-Atayde, Antonio R.
    Prasad, Deepa
    Rosental, Carlos F.
    Shah, Amee
    Samyn, Margaret M.
    Sleeper, Lynn A.
    Slesnick, Timothy
    Valsangiacomo, Emanuela
    Geva, Tal
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2022, 15 (08) : 1391 - 1405
  • [26] Diagnostic Performance of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Echocardiography in Evaluation of Cardiac and Paracardiac Masses
    Patel, Rima
    Lim, Ruth P.
    Saric, Muhamed
    Nayar, Ambika
    Babb, James
    Ettel, Mark
    Axel, Leon
    Srichai, Monvadi B.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2016, 117 (01): : 135 - 140
  • [27] Quantitative Clinical Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Reiter, Ursula
    Reiter, Clemens
    Kraeuter, Corina
    Nizhnikava, Volha
    Fuchsjaeger, Michael H.
    Reiter, Gert
    ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 2020, 192 (03): : 246 - 255
  • [28] Assessment of Pericardial Diseases and Cardiac Masses with Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
    Dawson, Dana
    Mohiaddin, Raad
    PROGRESS IN CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES, 2011, 54 (03) : 305 - 319
  • [29] Magnetic resonance imaging in clinical cardiac electrophysiology
    Ranjan, R. (ravi.ranjan@hsc.utah.edu), 1600, Begell House Inc. (40):
  • [30] AORTITIS ON CARDIAC MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING WITH HISTOPATHOLOGIC CORRELATION
    Al-Sabeq, Basil
    Shen, Steven
    Hinojosa, Jeremy J.
    Nabi, Faisal
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 73 (09) : 2245 - 2245