Patterns of Multilevel Variance in Psycho-Educational Phenomena: Comparing Motivation, Engagement, Climate, Teaching, and Achievement Factors

被引:42
作者
Martin, Andrew J. [1 ]
Bobis, Janette [1 ]
Anderson, Judy [1 ]
Way, Jennifer [1 ]
Vellar, Rosemary [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Fac Educ & Social Work, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[2] Catholic Educ Off, Sydney, NSW, Australia
来源
ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PADAGOGISCHE PSYCHOLOGIE | 2011年 / 25卷 / 01期
关键词
multilevel modeling; motivation; engagement; climate; 6 SCHOOL SUBJECTS; OF-FIT INDEXES; CONSTRUCT-VALIDITY; HOMEWORK EFFORT; STUDENTS; ENVIRONMENT; ISSUES; TIME;
D O I
10.1024/1010-0652/a000029
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
The present study explored multilevel variance for a range of salient psycho-educational factors in mathematics. With a sample of 4,383 students (Years 5-8) in 257 classrooms and 47 schools, data indicated patterns of variance across the selection of psycho-educational factors. For all factors, the bulk of variance resided at the student (and residual) level. In ascending order of upper-level variance were motivation, perceived motivational 'climate', homework completion, teacher-student relationships, and achievement - with motivation and perceived 'climate' yielding very little upper-level variance. Hence, although there is usually a hierarchical structure in which psycho-educational factors are situated, there is variation in patterns of multilevel variance across the range of factors. In exploring a range of psycho-educational phenomena from a multilevel perspective, the present study offers further direction for researchers selecting and operationalizing psycho-educational phenomena in multilevel research. Implications for pedagogy, classroom climate, and separating teaching effects from teacher effects and schooling effects from school effects are also discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:49 / 61
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   CLASSROOMS - GOALS, STRUCTURES, AND STUDENT MOTIVATION [J].
AMES, C .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1992, 84 (03) :261-271
[2]  
[Anonymous], USERS GUIDE MLWIN VE
[3]  
Bandura A., 1997, SELF EFFICACY EXERCI
[4]  
Beretvas SN, 2008, QUANT METH EDUC BEHA, P161
[5]  
Bronfenbrenner U., 1979, The ecology of human development: experiments by nature and design, DOI DOI 10.2307/J.CTV26071R6
[6]  
Bronfenbrenner U., 2000, Encyclopaedia of psychology, DOI 10.1037/10518-046
[7]  
Bronfenbrenner U., 2001, International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences, P6963, DOI DOI 10.1016/B0-08-043076-7/00359-4
[8]   Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: A typology of composition models [J].
Chan, D .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 83 (02) :234-246
[9]   Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance [J].
Chen, Fang Fang .
STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2007, 14 (03) :464-504
[10]   Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance [J].
Cheung, GW ;
Rensvold, RB .
STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2002, 9 (02) :233-255