Adaptation pathways for conservation law and policy

被引:14
作者
McDonald, Jan [1 ,2 ]
McCormack, Phillipa C. [1 ]
Dunlop, Michael [3 ]
Farrier, David [4 ]
Feehely, Jess [5 ]
Gilfedder, Louise [6 ]
Hobday, Alistair J. [2 ,7 ]
Reside, April E. [8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tasmania, Fac Law, Sandy Bay, Tas 7002, Australia
[2] Univ Tasmania, Ctr Marine Socioecol, Hobart, Tas, Australia
[3] CSIRO Land & Water, Canberra, ACT, Australia
[4] Univ Wollongong, Sch Law, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
[5] Environm Defenders Off EDO Tasmania, Hobart, Tas, Australia
[6] Univ Tasmania, Sch Technol Environm & Design, Sandy Bay, Tas, Australia
[7] CSIRO Oceans & Atmosphere, Hobart, Tas, Australia
[8] Univ Queensland, Sch Biol Sci, St Lucia, Qld, Australia
关键词
adaptation; Australia; biodiversity conservation; climate change; law; CLIMATE-CHANGE ADAPTATION; BIODIVERSITY; PRIORITIZATION; RESILIENCE; STRATEGIES; MANAGEMENT; AUSTRALIA; ABUNDANCE; HABITAT; REFORM;
D O I
10.1002/wcc.555
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Globally, biodiversity is under increasing pressure from human activities despite protective measures in conservation laws. Climate change will exacerbate those pressures and the effects of habitat loss and species decline. Current approaches to conservation law in most countries focus on establishing protected areas and limiting activities outside reserves that might affect priority species, habitats, and ecological communities. These measures have had mixed success depending on scale and implementation, but are likely to perform poorly under conditions of future change. To prepare for the future, we consider how conservation law and policy needs to anticipate and manage for future change; widen its scope beyond species and ecological communities that are currently threatened; and support adaptive management of priority areas and species. Using Australian conservation law as a case study, we outline three possible routes by which this shift could occur. The first involves enhancing the adaptiveness of conservation law, the second expands the focus of conservation law from protected areas and listed species to include ecosystems and ecosystem services, while the third attempts to do both simultaneously. We examine the legal mechanisms needed to implement each route, examples of their use in practice, and barriers that must be overcome for successful implementation. This article is categorized under: Climate, Ecology, and Conservation > Conservation Strategies
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 89 条
[21]  
Department of the Environment and Energy, 2009, AUSTR STRAT NAT RES
[22]  
Department of the Environment and Energy, 2017, REC PLAN GIANT FRESH
[23]  
Department of the Environment Water Heritage and the Arts, 2010, AUSTR BIOD CONS STRA
[24]   BIODIVERSITY Strategy conservation [J].
Dunlop, Michael .
NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2013, 3 (12) :1019-1020
[25]  
Dunlop Michael., 2008, Implications of Climate Change for Australia's National Reserve System - A Preliminary Assessment
[26]  
Endangered Species Act, 1973, END SPEC ACT 1973 US
[27]  
Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act, 1999, The Environment, Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999
[28]  
*EU, 1992, OJ L, V206
[29]   Threatened species listing as a trigger for conservation action [J].
Farrier, D. ;
Whelan, R. ;
Mooney, C. .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2007, 10 (03) :219-229
[30]  
Farrier D, 2004, THREATENED SPECIES LEGISLATION: IS IT JUST AN ACT?, P30