Intrauterine Device Expulsion After Postpartum Placement A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

被引:47
作者
Jatlaoui, Tara C.
Whiteman, Maura K.
Jeng, Gary
Tepper, Naomi K.
Berry-Bibee, Erin
Jamieson, Denise J.
Marchbanks, Polly A.
Curtis, Kathryn M.
机构
[1] Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Div Reprod Hlth, Atlanta, GA USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA
[3] Emory Univ, Sch Med, Atlanta, GA USA
关键词
IMMEDIATE POSTPLACENTAL INSERTION; COPPER T 380A; CONTRACEPTIVE-DEVICE; CESAREAN DELIVERY; DELAYED INSERTION; CLINICAL-TRIAL; IUD INSERTION; PERIOD; COMPLICATIONS; CONTINUATION;
D O I
10.1097/AOG.0000000000002822
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To estimate expulsion rates among women with postpartum intrauterine device (IUD) placement by timing of insertion, IUD type, and delivery method. DATA SOURCES: We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials. gov from 1974 to May 2018. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: We searched databases for any published studies that examined postpartum placement of a copper IUD or levonorgestrel intrauterine system and reported counts of expulsions. We assessed study quality using the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force evidence grading system. We calculated pooled absolute rates of IUD expulsion and estimated adjusted relative risks (RRs) for timing of postpartum placement, delivery method, and IUD type using log-binomial multivariable regression model. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: We identified 48 level I to II-3 studies of poor to good quality. Pooled rates of expulsion varied by timing of IUD placement, ranging from 1.9% with interval placements (4 weeks postpartum or greater), 10.0% for immediate placements (10 minutes or less after placental delivery), and 29.7% for early placements (greater than 10 minutes to less than 4 weeks postpartum). Immediate and early postpartum placements were associated with increased risk of expulsion compared with interval placement (adjusted RR 7.63, 95% CI 4.31-13.51; adjusted RR 6.17, 95% CI 3.19-11.93, respectively). Postpartum placement less than 4 weeks after vaginal delivery was associated with an increased risk of expulsion compared with cesarean delivery (adjusted RR 5.19, 95% CI 3.85-6.99). Analysis of expulsion rates at less than 4 weeks postpartum also indicated that the levonorgestrel intrauterine system was associated with a higher risk of expulsion (adjusted RR 1.91, 95% CI 1.50-2.43) compared with CuT380A. CONCLUSION: Postpartum IUD expulsion rates vary by timing of placement, delivery method, and IUD type. These results can aid in counseling women to make an informed choice about when to initiate their IUD and to help institutions implement postpartum contraception programs.
引用
收藏
页码:895 / 905
页数:11
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]   Visibility of Strings After Postplacental Intracesarean Insertion of CuT380A and Cu375 Intrauterine Contraceptive Device: A Randomized Comparative Study [J].
Agarwal K. ;
Dewan R. ;
Mittal P. ;
Aggarwal A. .
The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India, 2017, 67 (5) :324-329
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2018, CONTRACEPTION
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2016, INT J REPROD MED
[4]  
[Anonymous], AM J OBSTET GYNECOL
[5]   Intrauterine device placement at 3 versus 6 weeks postpartum: a randomized trial [J].
Baldwin, Maureen K. ;
Edelman, Alison B. ;
Lim, Jeong Y. ;
Nichols, Mark D. ;
Bednarek, Paula H. ;
Jensen, Jeffrey T. .
CONTRACEPTION, 2016, 93 (04) :356-363
[6]  
Bonilla Rosales F, 2005, REV MED I MEX SEGURO, V43, P5
[7]  
Borders AE, 2016, OBSTET GYNECOL, V128, pE32
[8]   Malpositioned Intrauterine Contraceptive Devices Risk Factors, Outcomes, and Future Pregnancies [J].
Braaten, Kari P. ;
Benson, Carol B. ;
Maurer, Rie ;
Goldberg, Alisa B. .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2011, 118 (05) :1014-1020
[9]   A randomised clinical trial to assess satisfaction with the levonorgestrel- releasing intrauterine system inserted at caesarean section compared to postpartum placement [J].
Braniff, Kathleen ;
Gomez, Edmund ;
Muller, Reinhold .
AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2015, 55 (03) :279-283
[10]  
Bryant Amy G, 2013, Afr J Reprod Health, V17, P72