Validation of the A&D UM-101 professional hybrid device for office blood pressure measurement according to the International Protocol

被引:30
|
作者
Stergiou, George S. [1 ]
Giovas, Periklis P. [1 ]
Gkinos, Charilaos P. [1 ]
Tzamouranis, Dimitris G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Third Univ, Sotiria Hosp, Dept Med, Hypertens Ctr, GR-11527 Athens, Greece
关键词
accuracy; European Society of Hypertension; hybrid sphygmomanometer; International Protocol; office blood pressure; professional device; validation;
D O I
10.1097/MBP.0b013e3282c9acb0
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
Objective Assessment of the accuracy of the A&D UM-101 mercury-free professional device for auscultatory blood pressure (BP) measurement according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol. Further to auscultation, the device has a button to mark readings during deflation. Methods Fifteen adults were included in phase 1 and another 18 in phase 2. Simultaneous BP measurements were taken by two observers (connected mercury sphygmomanometers) four times, sequentially with three measurements using the tested device (two connected tested devices, one used with and the other without the mark button). Results In phase 1, the device produced 44/45/45 measurements within 5/10/15 mmHg, respectively, for systolic BP (SBP) and 39/43/45 for diastolic (DBP). In phase 2.1, 87/97/99 measurements within 5/10/15 mmHg, respectively, for SBP, and 91/97/99 for DBP (using the mark button 65/93/98 for SBP and 76/96/99 for DBP). In phase 2.2, 29 participants had at least two of their SBP differences within 5 mmHg and none had any differences within 5 mmHg, whereas 32 and none, respectively, for DBP (with mark 24/4 participants for SBP; 29/1 for DBP). Mean SBP differences were -1.5 +/- 3.5 mmHg and DBP -1.3 +/- 3.0 (with mark -3.6 +/- 4.2 and -2.8 +/- 3.7). The difference in SBP measured by the tested device with versus without using the mark button was 3.0 +/- 3.3 mmHg (P<0.001) and DBP 1.9 +/- 2.5 mmHg (P<0.001). Conclusion The device comfortably passed the validation protocol requirements. Using the mark button, the device, however, failed to meet the validation criteria. Therefore, it is recommended for clinical use without using the mark button.
引用
收藏
页码:37 / 42
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Validation of an Automated Office Blood Pressure Machine in Pregnant Women According to the AAMI 2013/ISO Protocol
    Tran, Karen
    Potts, Jayson
    Purkiss, Susan
    Robertson, Julie
    Khan, Nadia
    Padwal, Raj
    Chan, Wee-Shian
    HYPERTENSION, 2018, 72 (06) : E91 - E94
  • [42] Validation of the Tensoval Duo Control II blood pressure monitor for clinic use and self-measurement according to the British Hypertension Society protocol and the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010
    de Greeff, Annemarie
    Shennan, Andrew H.
    BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING, 2013, 18 (03) : 161 - 166
  • [43] Validation of four automatic devices for self-measurement of blood pressure according to the International Protocol: The Pic Indolor Personal Check, Comfort Check, My Check and Travel Check
    Germano, Giuseppe
    Psimenos, Angelos
    Sarullo, Francesco
    Venditti, Alessandro
    Pecchioli, Valerio
    Asmar, Roland
    BLOOD PRESSURE, 2009, 18 : 15 - 23
  • [44] Validation of the Medipro MediCare 100f upper arm blood pressure monitor, for self-measurement, according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010
    Yi, Jun
    Wan, Yi
    Pan, Feng
    Yu, Xiaorong
    Zhao, Huadong
    Shang, Fujun
    Xu, Yongyong
    BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING, 2011, 16 (04) : 197 - 199
  • [45] Validation of the iHealth BP5 wireless upper arm blood pressure monitor for self-measurement according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010
    Shang, Fujun
    Zhu, Yizheng
    Zhu, Zhenlai
    Liu, Lei
    Wan, Yi
    BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING, 2013, 18 (05) : 278 - 281
  • [46] Validation of Transtek blood pressure monitor TMB-1491 for self-measurement according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010
    Tian, Huiyong
    Zeng, Sijian
    Zhong, Xiaoyan
    Gong, Wei
    Liu, Wenjun
    BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING, 2015, 20 (05) : 280 - 282
  • [47] Validation of the QMon-20 oscillometric blood pressure monitor for professional office use in the general population according to the ANSI/ESH/ISO 81060-2:2018 protocol
    Rico-Martin, Sergio
    Sanchez-Bacaicoa, Marisol
    Calderon-Garcia, Julian F.
    Labrador-Gomez, Pedro J.
    De Nicolas Jimenez, Jorge M.
    Villa-Rincon, Juan
    Robles, Nicolas R.
    Guijarro, Carlos
    Iammarino, Chiara
    Rodilla-Salas, Enrique
    Sanchez Munoz-Torrero, Juan F.
    BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING, 2021, 26 (05) : 393 - 395
  • [48] Validation of the Braun BP 3550 wrist blood pressure measuring device with a position sensor and an EasyClick cuff according to the International Protocol in adults
    Iliman, Nevzat
    Altunkan, Sekip
    Kayaturk, Nur
    Altunkan, Erkan
    BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING, 2007, 12 (01) : 45 - 49
  • [49] Validation of the Omron 637IT wrist blood pressure measuring device with a position sensor according to the International Protocol in adults and obese adults
    Altunkan, S
    Öztas, K
    Altunkan, E
    BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING, 2006, 11 (02) : 79 - 85
  • [50] Validation of the Artsana CSI 610 automated blood pressure monitor in adults according to the International Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension
    Pini, Claudio
    Pastori, Marco
    Baccheschi, Jordan
    Omboni, Stefano
    Parati, Gianfranco
    BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING, 2007, 12 (03) : 179 - 184