Validation of the A&D UM-101 professional hybrid device for office blood pressure measurement according to the International Protocol

被引:30
|
作者
Stergiou, George S. [1 ]
Giovas, Periklis P. [1 ]
Gkinos, Charilaos P. [1 ]
Tzamouranis, Dimitris G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Third Univ, Sotiria Hosp, Dept Med, Hypertens Ctr, GR-11527 Athens, Greece
关键词
accuracy; European Society of Hypertension; hybrid sphygmomanometer; International Protocol; office blood pressure; professional device; validation;
D O I
10.1097/MBP.0b013e3282c9acb0
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
Objective Assessment of the accuracy of the A&D UM-101 mercury-free professional device for auscultatory blood pressure (BP) measurement according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol. Further to auscultation, the device has a button to mark readings during deflation. Methods Fifteen adults were included in phase 1 and another 18 in phase 2. Simultaneous BP measurements were taken by two observers (connected mercury sphygmomanometers) four times, sequentially with three measurements using the tested device (two connected tested devices, one used with and the other without the mark button). Results In phase 1, the device produced 44/45/45 measurements within 5/10/15 mmHg, respectively, for systolic BP (SBP) and 39/43/45 for diastolic (DBP). In phase 2.1, 87/97/99 measurements within 5/10/15 mmHg, respectively, for SBP, and 91/97/99 for DBP (using the mark button 65/93/98 for SBP and 76/96/99 for DBP). In phase 2.2, 29 participants had at least two of their SBP differences within 5 mmHg and none had any differences within 5 mmHg, whereas 32 and none, respectively, for DBP (with mark 24/4 participants for SBP; 29/1 for DBP). Mean SBP differences were -1.5 +/- 3.5 mmHg and DBP -1.3 +/- 3.0 (with mark -3.6 +/- 4.2 and -2.8 +/- 3.7). The difference in SBP measured by the tested device with versus without using the mark button was 3.0 +/- 3.3 mmHg (P<0.001) and DBP 1.9 +/- 2.5 mmHg (P<0.001). Conclusion The device comfortably passed the validation protocol requirements. Using the mark button, the device, however, failed to meet the validation criteria. Therefore, it is recommended for clinical use without using the mark button.
引用
收藏
页码:37 / 42
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Validation of the visomat comfort eco blood pressure measuring device according to the International Protocol
    Perkovic, Davor
    Guarnieri, Chiara
    Palatini, Paolo
    BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING, 2009, 14 (04) : 178 - 180
  • [22] Validation of four automatic devices for self-measurement of blood pressure according to the international protocol of the European Society of Hypertension
    Topouchian, Jirar
    Agnoletti, Davide
    Blacher, Jacques
    Youssef, Ahmed
    Ibanez, Isabel
    Khabouth, Jose
    Khawaja, Salwa
    Beaino, Layale
    Asmar, Roland
    VASCULAR HEALTH AND RISK MANAGEMENT, 2011, 7 : 709 - 717
  • [23] Validation of the professional device for blood pressure measurement Microlife WatchBP Office in adults and children according to the American National Standards Institute/Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation/International Organization for Standardization standard
    Kollias, Anastasios
    Ntineri, Angeliki
    Kyriakoulis, Konstantinos G.
    Stambolliu, Emelina
    Lagou, Styliani
    Boubouchairopoulou, Nadia
    Stergiou, George S.
    BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING, 2018, 23 (02) : 112 - 114
  • [24] Validation of the Microlife WatchBP O3 device for clinic, home, and ambulatory blood pressure measurement, according to the International Protocol
    Ragazzo, Fabio
    Saladini, Francesca
    Palatini, Paolo
    BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING, 2010, 15 (01) : 59 - 62
  • [25] Validation of the visocor HM40 wrist blood pressure measuring device according to the International Protocol
    Dorigatti, Francesca
    Bonso, Elisa
    Saladini, Francesca
    Palatini, Paolo
    BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING, 2009, 14 (02) : 83 - 86
  • [26] Validation of the A&D UA-774 (UA-767Plus) device for self-measurement of blood pressure
    Verdecchia, P
    Angeli, F
    Poeta, F
    Reboldi, GP
    Borgioni, C
    Pittavini, L
    Porcellati, C
    BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING, 2004, 9 (04) : 225 - 229
  • [27] Validation of four automatic devices for self-measurement of blood pressure according to the International Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension
    Belghazi, Jalil
    El Feghali, Ramzi N.
    Moussalem, Therese
    Rejdych, Maya
    Asmar, Roland G.
    VASCULAR HEALTH AND RISK MANAGEMENT, 2007, 3 (04) : 389 - 400
  • [28] Validation of the TRANSTEK blood pressure monitor TMB-986 for home blood pressure monitoring according to the International Protocol
    Liu, Wen Jun
    Li, Su Gang
    Song, Zhe
    Gong, Wei
    BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING, 2010, 15 (05) : 278 - 280
  • [29] Validation of the TRANSTEK TMB-988 wrist blood pressure monitor for home blood pressure monitoring according to the International Protocol
    Tian, Hui Yong
    Liu, Wen Jun
    Li, Su Gang
    Song, Zhe
    Gong, Wei
    BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING, 2010, 15 (06) : 326 - 328
  • [30] Validation of the Thermor BIOS BD215 device for home blood pressure measurement according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010
    Benetti, Elisabetta
    Fania, Claudio
    Hernandez, Veronica Marquez
    Palatini, Paolo
    BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING, 2014, 19 (03) : 176 - 179