Validation of the A&D UM-101 professional hybrid device for office blood pressure measurement according to the International Protocol

被引:30
|
作者
Stergiou, George S. [1 ]
Giovas, Periklis P. [1 ]
Gkinos, Charilaos P. [1 ]
Tzamouranis, Dimitris G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Third Univ, Sotiria Hosp, Dept Med, Hypertens Ctr, GR-11527 Athens, Greece
关键词
accuracy; European Society of Hypertension; hybrid sphygmomanometer; International Protocol; office blood pressure; professional device; validation;
D O I
10.1097/MBP.0b013e3282c9acb0
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
Objective Assessment of the accuracy of the A&D UM-101 mercury-free professional device for auscultatory blood pressure (BP) measurement according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol. Further to auscultation, the device has a button to mark readings during deflation. Methods Fifteen adults were included in phase 1 and another 18 in phase 2. Simultaneous BP measurements were taken by two observers (connected mercury sphygmomanometers) four times, sequentially with three measurements using the tested device (two connected tested devices, one used with and the other without the mark button). Results In phase 1, the device produced 44/45/45 measurements within 5/10/15 mmHg, respectively, for systolic BP (SBP) and 39/43/45 for diastolic (DBP). In phase 2.1, 87/97/99 measurements within 5/10/15 mmHg, respectively, for SBP, and 91/97/99 for DBP (using the mark button 65/93/98 for SBP and 76/96/99 for DBP). In phase 2.2, 29 participants had at least two of their SBP differences within 5 mmHg and none had any differences within 5 mmHg, whereas 32 and none, respectively, for DBP (with mark 24/4 participants for SBP; 29/1 for DBP). Mean SBP differences were -1.5 +/- 3.5 mmHg and DBP -1.3 +/- 3.0 (with mark -3.6 +/- 4.2 and -2.8 +/- 3.7). The difference in SBP measured by the tested device with versus without using the mark button was 3.0 +/- 3.3 mmHg (P<0.001) and DBP 1.9 +/- 2.5 mmHg (P<0.001). Conclusion The device comfortably passed the validation protocol requirements. Using the mark button, the device, however, failed to meet the validation criteria. Therefore, it is recommended for clinical use without using the mark button.
引用
收藏
页码:37 / 42
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Validation of the Microlife Watch BP Office professional device for office blood pressure measurement according to the International protocol
    Stergiou, George S.
    Tzamouranis, Dimitris
    Protogerou, Athanasios
    Nasothimiou, Efthimia
    Kapralos, Christos
    BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING, 2008, 13 (05) : 299 - 303
  • [2] Validation of the A&D UM-211 device for office blood pressure measurement according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010
    Fania, Claudio
    Albertini, Federica
    Palatini, Paolo
    BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING, 2017, 22 (05) : 302 - 305
  • [3] Validation of the A&D UM-201 device for office blood pressure measurement according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol Revision 2010
    Fania, Claudio
    Albertini, Federica
    Palatini, Paolo
    BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING, 2017, 22 (04) : 234 - 237
  • [4] A new technique for simultaneous validation of two manual nonmercury auscultatory sphygmomanometers (A&D UM-101 and Accoson Greenlight 300) based on the International protocol
    Pruijm, Menno T.
    Wuerzner, Gregoire
    Glatz, Nicolas
    Alwan, Heba
    Ponte, Belen
    Ackermann, Daniel
    Burnier, Michel
    Bochud, Murielle
    BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING, 2010, 15 (06) : 322 - 325
  • [5] Validation of the Parama-Tech PS-501 Device for Office Blood Pressure Measurement According to the International Protocol
    Kikuya, Masahiro
    Ohkubo, Takayoshi
    Satoh, Michihiro
    Hashimoto, Takanao
    Hirose, Takuo
    Metoki, Hirohito
    Obara, Taku
    Inoue, Ryusuke
    Asayama, Kei
    Totsune, Kazuhito
    Imai, Yutaka
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL HYPERTENSION, 2012, 34 (01) : 71 - 73
  • [6] Validation of the Microlife WatchBP Home device for self home blood pressure measurement according to the International Protocol
    Stergiou, George S.
    Giovas, Periklis P.
    Gkino, Charilaos P.
    Patouras, John D.
    BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING, 2007, 12 (03) : 185 - 188
  • [7] Validation of the A&D BP UB-543 wrist device for home blood pressure measurement according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010
    Fania, Claudio
    Benetti, Elisabetta
    Palatini, Paolo
    BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING, 2015, 20 (04) : 237 - 240
  • [8] Validation of the A&D BP UB-542 wrist device for home blood pressure measurement according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010
    Saladini, Francesca
    Benetti, Elisabetta
    Fania, Claudio
    Palatini, Paolo
    BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING, 2013, 18 (04) : 219 - 222
  • [9] Validation of the Omron® 705 IT device for blood pressure measurement according to the International validation Protocol
    El Assaad, MA
    Topouchian, JA
    Labaki, GS
    Asmar, RG
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2003, 16 (05) : 47A - 47A
  • [10] Validation of the A&D BP UA-651 device for home blood pressure measurement according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010
    Benetti, Elisabetta
    Fania, Claudio
    Palatini, Paolo
    BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING, 2014, 19 (01) : 50 - 53