Assessment of the biocompatibility of two novel, bionanocomposite scaffolds in a rodent model

被引:23
作者
Deeken, C. R. [2 ]
Esebua, M. [3 ]
Bachman, S. L. [4 ]
Ramshaw, B. J. [4 ]
Grant, S. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Missouri, Dept Biol Engn, Columbia, MO 65211 USA
[2] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Surg, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[3] Univ Missouri, Dept Pathol & Anat Sci, Columbia, MO USA
[4] Univ Missouri, Dept Gen Surg, Columbia, MO USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
crosslinking; extracellular matrix; gold nanoparticles; scaffold; silicon carbide nanowires; ENHANCED OSTEOBLAST ADHESION; MECHANICAL-PROPERTIES; EXTRACELLULAR-MATRIX; RECONSTRUCTION; REGENERATION; NANOCOMPOSITES; NANOPARTICLES; COMPOSITES; IMPLANTS;
D O I
10.1002/jbm.b.31778
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Two novel, bionanocomposite scaffolds were evaluated in a rodent model over the course of three months to determine whether these scaffolds possessed adequate biocompatibility characteristics to warrant further evaluation as possible tissue reconstruction scaffolds. These bionanocomposite scaffolds were comprised of amine-functionalized gold nanoparticles (AuNP) or silicon carbide nanowires (SiCNW) crosslinked to an acellular porcine diaphragm tendon. It was hypothesized that the addition of nanomaterials to the porcine tendon would also improve its biocompatibility by imparting a nanostructured surface. As early as seven days after implantation, both types of bionanocomposite scaffolds displayed evidence of granulation tissue and the beginning of scaffold remodeling with new collagen deposited by the host, and by ninety-seven days the bionanocomposite scaffolds were completely remodeled with no evidence of any adverse host tissue reaction or scar tissue formation. The AuNP bionanocomposite scaffolds exhibited accelerated scaffold remodeling compared to the SiCNW scaffolds. (C) 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater 96B: 351-359, 2011.
引用
收藏
页码:351 / 359
页数:9
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
Abraham GA, 2000, J BIOMED MATER RES, V51, P442, DOI 10.1002/1097-4636(20000905)51:3<442::AID-JBM19>3.3.CO
[2]  
2-W
[3]   Xenogeneic extracellular matrix as a scaffold for tissue reconstruction [J].
Badylak, SF .
TRANSPLANT IMMUNOLOGY, 2004, 12 (3-4) :367-377
[4]   The extracellular matrix as a biologic scaffold material [J].
Badylak, Stephen F. .
BIOMATERIALS, 2007, 28 (25) :3587-3593
[5]   A perspective on nanophase materials for orthopedic implant applications [J].
Balasundaram, Ganesan ;
Webster, Thomas J. .
JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY, 2006, 16 (38) :3737-3745
[6]   Abdominal wall reconstruction using biological tissue grafts: present status and future opportunities [J].
Bellows, Charles F. ;
Alder, Adam ;
Helton, W. Scott .
EXPERT REVIEW OF MEDICAL DEVICES, 2006, 3 (05) :657-675
[7]   Inferolateral AlloDerm hammock for implant coverage in breast reconstruction [J].
Breuing, Karl H. ;
Colwell, Amy S. .
ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2007, 59 (03) :250-255
[8]   Triple-helix scaffolds of grafted collagen reinforced by Al2O3-ZrO2 nanoparticles [J].
Cao, Yong ;
Zhou, Yuming ;
Shan, Yun ;
Ju, Huangxian ;
Xue, Xuejia .
ADVANCED MATERIALS, 2006, 18 (14) :1838-+
[9]  
Cartmell JS, 2000, J BIOMED MATER RES, V49, P134, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(200001)49:1<134::AID-JBM17>3.3.CO
[10]  
2-4