Rude Accountability: Informal Pressures on Frontline Bureaucrats in Bangladesh

被引:31
作者
Hossain, Naomi [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sussex, Inst Dev Studies, Brighton BN1 9RE, E Sussex, England
关键词
STREET-LEVEL BUREAUCRACY; POVERTY;
D O I
10.1111/j.1467-7660.2010.01663.x
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
This article is about 'rude' forms of accountability - the informal pressures used by citizens to claim public services and to sanction service failures. Rude accountability is characterized by a lack of official rules or formal basis and a reliance on the power of social norms and rules to influence and sanction official performance. The article draws on evidence from Bangladesh, a state which has not reformed its social sector governance, to explore when and why poor citizens resort to 'rude' accountability, whether they have a comparative advantage in the use of informal mechanisms, and whether these work, in terms of gaining better service. It asks what informal accountability mechanisms imply for governance reform in social services, and discusses lessons for other 'unreformed' states like Bangladesh.
引用
收藏
页码:907 / 928
页数:22
相关论文
共 79 条
[1]  
AHMED AU, 2004, 173 IFPRI FOOD CONS
[2]  
Ahmed Rafiuddin., 1981, BENGAL MUSLIMS 1871
[3]  
Ahmed S. M., 2008, Small scale old age and widow allowance for the poor in rural Bangladesh: an evaluation
[4]  
ALI T, 2006, 13 PRCPB
[5]  
ALSAMARRAI S, 2009, PUBLIC ADMIN DEVELOP, V28, P1
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2007, Evaluation of Citizen's Voice and Accountability: Review of the Literature Donor Approaches Report
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2008, UNDERSTANDING LOCA
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2005, DEV MAINTAINING ITEM
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2007, WILL IMPROVE GOVT DE
[10]  
[Anonymous], BANGL COUNTR ASS STR