Speech Perception with Cochlear Implants as Measured Using a Roving-Level Adaptive Test Method

被引:26
作者
Haumann, Sabine [1 ]
Lenarz, Thomas [1 ]
Buechner, Andreas [1 ]
机构
[1] Hannover Med Sch, Dept Otolaryngol, DE-30625 Hannover, Germany
来源
ORL-JOURNAL FOR OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY AND ITS RELATED SPECIALTIES | 2010年 / 72卷 / 06期
关键词
Adaptive response; Audiology; Cochlear implant; Speech processor; Speech understanding; DYNAMIC-RANGE; PERFORMANCE; PREDICTORS; SYSTEMS; DESIGNS; USERS; NOISE;
D O I
10.1159/000318872
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Aims: This paper uses a new method of speech testing where the hearing aid or cochlear implant (CI) users are tested in a more realistic listening situation. Methods: Groups of 11 subjects matched for performance with 5 different CI systems, for a total of 55 subjects, were tested with an adaptive test regime where the presentation level of the speech signal roved by +/- 10 or +/- 15 dB. Results: Speech reception thresholds varied widely between -4.8 and 17.3 dB with the +/- 15 dB roving condition being more difficult than the +/- 10 dB roving condition. We also found significant differences in speech reception threshold between groups using different devices. Conclusion: The test method used in our study, which attempts to test CI users in a more realistic listening situation, is sensitive to the effects of various subject-specific and technical parameters on everyday speech perception with CIs. Copyright (C) 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel
引用
收藏
页码:312 / 318
页数:7
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
*ADV BION, PROD SPEC
[2]  
BATTMER RD, 1995, P INT COCHL IMPL SPE, P185
[3]   Comparison of dual-time-constant and fast-acting automatic gain control (AGC) systems in cochlear implants [J].
Boyle, Patrick J. ;
Buechner, Andreas ;
Stone, Michael A. ;
Lenarz, Thomas ;
Moore, Brian C. J. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2009, 48 (04) :211-221
[4]   Evaluation of advanced bionics high resolution mode [J].
Buechner, Andreas ;
Frohne-Buechner, Carolin ;
Gaertner, Lutz ;
Lesinski-Schiedat, Anke ;
Battmer, Rolf-Dieter ;
Lenarz, Thomas .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2006, 45 (07) :407-416
[5]   Speech coding strategies and revised cochlear implant candidacy: An analysis of post-implant performance [J].
David, EE ;
Ostroff, JM ;
Shipp, D ;
Nedzelski, JM ;
Chen, JM ;
Parnes, LS ;
Zimmerman, K ;
Schramm, D ;
Seguin, C .
OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2003, 24 (02) :228-233
[6]  
Fastl H, 1993, P TC HEAR AC SOC JAP, pH93
[7]  
GANTZ BJ, 1988, LARYNGOSCOPE, V98, P1100
[8]  
Gelfand S.A., 2009, Essentials of audiology
[9]  
HochmairDesoyer I, 1997, AM J OTOL, V18, pS83
[10]   Performance groups in adult cochlear implant users: Speech perception results from 1984 until today [J].
Krueger, Beate ;
Joseph, Gert ;
Rost, Urte ;
Strauss-Schier, Angelika ;
Lenarz, Thomas ;
Buechner, Andreas .
OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2008, 29 (04) :509-512