Device-associated infection rates for non-intensive care unit patients

被引:54
作者
Vonberg, Ralf-Peter
Behnke, M.
Geffers, C.
Sohr, D.
Rueden, H.
Dettenkofer, M.
Gastmeier, P.
机构
[1] Hannover Med Sch, Hosp Epidemiol, Inst Med Microbiol, Div Hosp Epidemiol & Infect Control, D-30625 Hannover, Germany
[2] Hannover Med Sch, Hosp Epidemiol, Inst Med Microbiol, German Natl Reference Ctr Surveillance Nosocomial, D-3000 Hannover, Germany
[3] Humboldt Univ, Berlin, Germany
[4] Univ Hosp, Univ Med Ctr, Hosp Epidemiol, Inst Environm Med, Freiburg, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1086/503339
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background. Reference data from intensive care units (ICUs) are not applicable to non-ICU patients because of the differences in device use rates, length of stay, and severity of underlying diseases among the patient populations. In contrast to the huge amount of data available for ICU patients, appropriate surveillance data for non-ICU patients have been missing in Germany. Objective. To establish a new module ('' DEVICE-KISS '') of the German Nosocomial Infection Surveillance System for generating stratified reference data for non-ICU wards. Setting. Non-ICU patients from 42 German hospitals. Methods. Monthly patient-days, device-days and nosocomial infections (NIs) ( using Centers for Disease Control and Prevention definitions) were counted. Device use rates were calculated, and NI rates were stratified by different medical specialities. Results. From July 2002 through June 2004, among the 77 wards, there were a total of 536,955 patient-days and 74,188 device- days ( for CVC-associated primary bloodstream infections, there were 181,401 patient-days and 8,317 central vascular catheter [CVC]-days in 29 wards; for urinary catheter - associated urinary tract infections, there were 445,536 patient-days and 65,871 urinary catheter-days in 65 wards) and 483 NIs ( 36 bloodstream infections and 447 urinary tract infections). The mean device use rates were 4.6 device- days per 100 patient- days for CVCs (29 wards) and 14.8 device- days per 100 patient- days for urinary catheters (65 wards), respectively. Mean deviceassociated NI rates were 4.3 infections per 1,000 CVC- days for CVC-associated bloodstream infections and 6.8 infections per 1,000 urinary catheter - days for catheter-associated urinary tract infections. Conclusions DEVICE-KISS allows non-ICUs to recognize an outlier position with regard to NIs by providing well-founded reference data for non-ICU patients.
引用
收藏
页码:357 / 361
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Device-associated infection rates in pediatric and neonatal intensive care units in El Salvador: Findings of the INICC [J].
Duenas, Lourdes ;
Bran de Casares, Ana C. ;
Rosenthal, Victor D. ;
Jesus Machuca, Lilian .
JOURNAL OF INFECTION IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES, 2011, 5 (06) :445-451
[22]   Device-associated infection rates in intensive care units of Brazilian hospitals: findings of the International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium [J].
Salomao, Reinaldo ;
Rosenthal, Victor D. ;
Grimberg, Gorki ;
Nouer, Simone ;
Blecher, Sergio ;
Buchner-Ferreira, Silvia ;
Vianna, Rosa ;
Angela Maretti-da-Silva, Maria .
REVISTA PANAMERICANA DE SALUD PUBLICA-PAN AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2008, 24 (03) :195-202
[23]   The Descriptive Epidemiology of Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infection among Patients in Non-Intensive Care Unit Settings [J].
Tedja, Rudy ;
Gordon, Steven M. ;
Fatica, Cynthia ;
Fraser, Thomas G. .
INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2014, 35 (02) :164-168
[24]   Preventing pressure injuries in intensive care unit patients compared to non-intensive care unit patients: Is it any different? [J].
Coyer, Fiona ;
Delaney, Lori ;
Ingleman, Jessica .
INTENSIVE AND CRITICAL CARE NURSING, 2024, 81
[25]   Comparison of Non-Intensive Care Unit (ICU) versus ICU Rates of Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection in Community Hospitals [J].
Lewis, Sarah S. ;
Knelson, Lauren P. ;
Moehring, Rebekah W. ;
Chen, Luke F. ;
Sexton, Daniel J. ;
Anderson, Deverick J. .
INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2013, 34 (07) :744-747
[26]   Prospective surveillance of device-associated health care-associated infection in an intensive care unit of a tertiary care hospital in New Delhi, India [J].
Kumar, Shilpee ;
Sen, Poornima ;
Gaind, Rajni ;
Verma, Pardeep Kumar ;
Gupta, Poonam ;
Suri, Prem Rose ;
Nagpal, Sunita ;
Rai, Anil Kumar .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL, 2018, 46 (02) :202-206
[27]   Novel influenza A 2009-A comparison of intensive care unit vs non-intensive care unit patients [J].
Boehringer, C. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2010, 14 :E93-E93
[28]   Evaluating sleep characteristics in intensive care unit and non-intensive care unit physicians [J].
Ok, G. ;
Yilmaz, H. ;
Tok, D. ;
Erbuyun, K. ;
Coban, S. ;
Dinc, G. .
ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE, 2011, 39 (06) :1071-1075
[29]   Surveillance of device-associated infection rates at adult intensive care units in the VINCat program (2010-2022) [J].
Nuvials, Xavier ;
Fernandez, Inmaculada ;
Almendral, Alexander ;
Limon, Enric ;
Pujol, Miquel ;
Diaz, Emili .
ENFERMEDADES INFECCIOSAS Y MICROBIOLOGIA CLINICA, 2025, 43 :S52-S59
[30]   Modifiable risk factors of ventilator-associated pneumonia in non-intensive care unit versus intensive care unit [J].
Udompat, Patpong ;
Rongmuang, Daravan ;
Hershow, Ronald Craig .
JOURNAL OF INFECTION IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES, 2021, 15 (10) :1471-1480