Full-field digital versus screen-film mammography: Comparative accuracy in concurrent screening cohorts

被引:117
作者
Del Turco, Marco Rosselli
Mantellini, Paola
Ciatto, Stefano
Bonardi, Rita
Martinelli, Francesca
Lazzari, Barbara
Houssami, Nehmat
机构
[1] Ctr Studio & Prevenz Oncol, I-50131 Florence, Italy
[2] Univ Sydney, Sch Publ Hlth, Screening & Test Evaluat Program, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
关键词
breast cancer; digital imaging; mammography; mammography screening; women's imaging;
D O I
10.2214/AJR.07.2303
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of digital mammography with that of screen-film mammography in concurrent cohorts participating in the same population-based screening program. MATERIALS AND METHODS. In a retrospective study covering 2004-2005, we compared digital with screen-film mammography in two concurrent screening cohorts of women 50-69 years old participating in a screening program operated from mobile units. Each cohort had 14,385 participants matched by age and interpreting radiologist from all participants consecutively registered. We compared recall and cancer detection rates. RESULTS. The recall rate was higher for digital mammography (4.56% vs 3.96%,p 0.01), particularly when clustered microcalcifications were the only finding (1.05% vs 0.41%, p 10-6) and for younger women (50-59 vs 60-69 years, 5.12% vs 4.17%, p = 0.009). The higher recall rate for digital mammography was mainly evident at incidence screening. The recall rate due to poor technical quality was lower with digital mammography (0.27% vs 0.50%, p = 0.002), possibly because real-time feedback was available. The detection rate was higher for digital mammography (0.72% vs 0.58%, p = 0.14), particularly for cancers depicted as clustered microcalcifications (0.26% vs 0. 12%, p = 0.007), in younger (50-59 years) women (0.63% vs 0.42%, p = 0.09), and in denser breasts (1.09% vs 0.53%, p = 0.24). No significant difference was observed in positive predictive value on recall for digital mammography or screen-film mammography. Early cancer (pTis, pT1mic, pT1a) was more frequent in cancer detected with digital mammography than in that detected with screen-film mammography (41.3% vs 27.3%, p = 0.06). CONCLUSION. Digital mammography maybe more effective than screen-film mammography in contemporary screening practice in mobile units. The data indicate that digital mammography depicts more tumors than does screen-film. mammography, especially lesions seen as microcalcifications. The potential association with improved outcome warrants further study.
引用
收藏
页码:860 / 866
页数:7
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] *AM ASS PHYS MED T, ASS DISPL PERF MED I
  • [2] Conventional versus digital mammography in the analysis of screen-detected lesions with low positive predictive value
    Bonardi, R
    Ambrogetti, D
    Ciatto, S
    Gentile, E
    Lazzari, B
    Mantellini, P
    Nannelli, E
    Ristori, E
    Sottani, L
    Del Turco, MR
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2005, 55 (02) : 258 - 263
  • [3] A methodology to evaluate differential costs of full field digital as compared to conventional screen film mammography in a clinical setting
    Ciatto, S
    Brancato, B
    Baglioni, R
    Turci, A
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2006, 57 (01) : 69 - 75
  • [4] THE DETECTABILITY OF BREAST-CANCER BY SCREENING MAMMOGRAPHY
    CIATTO, S
    DELTURCO, MR
    ZAPPA, M
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1995, 71 (02) : 337 - 339
  • [5] Di Nubila Brunella, 2003, Radiol Med, V106, P297
  • [6] Likelihood ratios for clinical examination, mammography, ultrasound and fine needle biopsy in women with breast problems
    Houssami, N
    Irwig, L
    [J]. BREAST, 1998, 7 (02) : 85 - 89
  • [7] Sydney Breast Imaging Accuracy Study: comparative sensitivity and specificity of mammography and sonography in young women with symptoms.
    Houssami, N
    Irwig, L
    Simpson, JM
    McKessar, M
    Blome, S
    Noakes, J
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2003, 180 (04) : 935 - 940
  • [8] Evaluating new screening tests for breast cancer - May require randomised controlled trials to assess overdetection
    Irwig, L
    Houssami, N
    Armstrong, B
    Glasziou, P
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2006, 332 (7543): : 678 - 679
  • [9] New technologies in screening for breast cancer: a systematic review of their accuracy
    Irwig, L
    Houssami, N
    van Vliet, C
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2004, 90 (11) : 2118 - 2122
  • [10] Clinical comparison of full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography of breast cancer
    Lewin, JM
    D'Orsi, CJ
    Hendrick, RE
    Moss, LJ
    Isaacs, PK
    Karellas, A
    Cutter, GR
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2002, 179 (03) : 671 - 677