Estimating the dynamic role of attention via random utility

被引:11
作者
Smith, Stephanie M. [1 ]
Krajbich, Ian [1 ,2 ]
Webb, Ryan [3 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Dept Psychol, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[2] Ohio State Univ, Dept Econ, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[3] Univ Toronto, Rotman Sch Management, Toronto, ON, Canada
来源
JOURNAL OF THE ECONOMIC SCIENCE ASSOCIATION-JESA | 2019年 / 5卷 / 01期
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Eye tracking; Sequential sampling; Diffusion model; Random utility; aDDM; Attention; DRIFT-DIFFUSION MODEL; EYE-TRACKING; VISUAL FIXATIONS; CHOICE; COMPUTATION; SEARCH; GAMES; TIME;
D O I
10.1007/s40881-019-00062-4
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
When making decisions, people tend to look back and forth between the alternatives until they eventually make a choice. Eye-tracking research has established that these shifts in attention are strongly linked to choice outcomes. A predominant framework for understanding the dynamics of the choice process, and thus the effects of attention, is sequential sampling of information. However, existing methods for estimating the attention parameters in these models are computationally costly and overly flexible, and yield estimates with unknown precision and bias. Here we propose an estimation method that relies on a link between sequential sampling models and random utility models (RUM). This method uses familiar econometric tools (i.e., logistic regression) and yields estimates that appear to be unbiased and relatively precise compared to existing methods, in a small fraction of the computation time. The RUM thus appears to be a useful tool for estimating the effects of attention on choice.
引用
收藏
页码:97 / 111
页数:15
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   Amount and time exert independent influences on intertemporal choice [J].
Amasino, Dianna R. ;
Sullivan, Nicolette J. ;
Kranton, Rachel E. ;
Huettel, Scott A. .
NATURE HUMAN BEHAVIOUR, 2019, 3 (04) :383-392
[2]   Tracking Decision Makers under Uncertainty [J].
Arieli, Amos ;
Ben-Ami, Yaniv ;
Rubinstein, Ariel .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL-MICROECONOMICS, 2011, 3 (04) :68-76
[3]  
Armel KC, 2008, JUDGM DECIS MAK, V3, P396
[4]   Finding the Right Fit: A Comparison of Process Assumptions Underlying Popular Drift-Diffusion Models [J].
Ashby, Nathaniel J. S. ;
Jekel, Marc ;
Dickert, Stephan ;
Gloeckner, Andreas .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2016, 42 (12) :1982-1993
[5]  
Bagdziunaite D, 2014, EMAC 2014
[6]  
Bergstra J, 2012, J MACH LEARN RES, V13, P281
[7]   Eye Tracking and Pupillometry Are Indicators of Dissociable Latent Decision Processes [J].
Cavanagh, James F. ;
Wiecki, Thomas V. ;
Kochar, Angad ;
Frank, Michael J. .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2014, 143 (04) :1476-1488
[8]   Computational modeling of epiphany learning [J].
Chen, Wei James ;
Krajbich, Ian .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2017, 114 (18) :4637-4642
[9]  
Chiong K., 2018, SPLIT 2 DECISION MAK
[10]   An eye-tracking study of feature-based choice in one-shot games [J].
Devetag G. ;
Di Guida S. ;
Polonio L. .
Experimental Economics, 2016, 19 (1) :177-201