Tales from a thousand and one ways to integrate marine ecosystem components when assessing the environmental status

被引:87
作者
Borja, Angel [1 ]
Prins, Theo C. [2 ]
Simboura, Nomiki [3 ]
Andersen, Jesper H. [4 ]
Berg, Torsten [5 ]
Marques, Joao-Carlos [6 ]
Neto, Joao M. [6 ]
Papadopoulou, Nadia [7 ]
Reker, Johnny [8 ]
Teixeira, Heliana [9 ]
Uusitalo, Laura [10 ]
机构
[1] AZTI Tecnalia, Div Marine Res, Portualdea S-N, Pasaia 20110, Spain
[2] Deltares, Delft, Netherlands
[3] Hellen Ctr Marine Res, Inst Oceanog, Anavissos, Greece
[4] NIVA Denmark Water Res, Copenhagen, Denmark
[5] MariLim Aquat Res GmbH, Schonkirchen, Germany
[6] Univ Coimbra, Fac Sci & Technol, MARE Marine & Environm Sci Ctr, Coimbra, Portugal
[7] Hellen Ctr Marine Res, Inst Marine Biol Resources & Inland Waters, Iraklion, Greece
[8] European Environm Agcy, Copenhagen, Denmark
[9] European Commiss, Joint Res Ctr, Inst Environm & Sustainabil, Ispra, Italy
[10] Finnish Environm Inst SYKE, Helsinki, Finland
关键词
ecosystems; marine; indicators; Marine Strategy Framework Directive; descriptors; criteria; assessment; integration; BIOLOGICAL VALUATION; INDICATORS; WATER; UNCERTAINTY; MANAGEMENT; ESTUARINE; NETWORKS; IMPACT; BAY;
D O I
10.3389/fmars.2014.00072
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Assessing the environmental status of marine ecosystems is useful when communicating key messages to policymakers or the society, reducing the complex information of the multiple ecosystem and biodiversity components and their important spatial and temporal variability into manageable units. Taking into account the ecosystem components to be addressed (e.g., biological, chemical, physical), the numerous biodiversity elements to be assessed (e.g., from microbes to sea mammals), the different indicators needed to be studied (e.g., in Europe, 56 indicators of status have been selected), and the different assessment scales to be undertaken (e.g., from local to regional sea scale), some criteria to define spatial scales and some guidance on aggregating and integrating information is needed. We have reviewed, from ecological and management perspectives, the approaches for aggregating and integrating currently available for marine status assessment in Europe and other regions of the world. Advantages and shortcomings of the different alternatives are highlighted. We provide some guidance on the steps toward defining rules for aggregation and integration of information at multiple levels of ecosystem organization, providing recommendations on when using specific rules in the assessment. A main conclusion is that any integration principle used should be ecologically-relevant, transparent and well documented, in order to make it comparable across different geographic regions.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 57 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], BALT SEA ENV P
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2009, Balt. Sea Environ. Proc
  • [3] The use of environmental integrative indicators to assess seabed disturbance in estuaries and coasts: Application to the Humber Estuary, UK
    Aubry, A
    Elliott, M
    [J]. MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN, 2006, 53 (1-4) : 175 - 185
  • [4] Bayesian belief networks as a meta-modelling tool in integrated river basin management - Pros and cons in evaluating nutrient abatement decisions under uncertainty in a Norwegian river basin
    Barton, D. N.
    Saloranta, T.
    Moe, S. J.
    Eggestad, H. O.
    Kuikka, S.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2008, 66 (01) : 91 - 104
  • [5] Bayesian networks in environmental and resource management
    Barton, David N.
    Kuikka, Sakari
    Varis, Olli
    Uusitalo, Laura
    Henriksen, Hans Jorgen
    Borsuk, Mark
    de la Hera, Africa
    Farmani, Raziyeh
    Johnson, Sandra
    Linnell, John D. C.
    [J]. INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT, 2012, 8 (03) : 418 - 429
  • [6] Three hundred ways to assess Europe's surface waters: An almost complete overview of biological methods to implement the Water Framework Directive
    Birk, Sebastian
    Bonne, Wendy
    Borja, Angel
    Brucet, Sandra
    Courrat, Anne
    Poikane, Sandra
    Solimini, Angelo
    van de Bund, Wouter
    Zampoukas, Nikolaos
    Hering, Daniel
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2012, 18 : 31 - 41
  • [7] The water framework directive: water alone, or in association with sediment and biota, in determining quality standards?
    Borja, A
    Valencia, V
    Franco, J
    Muxika, I
    Bald, J
    Belzurice, MJ
    Solaun, O
    [J]. MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN, 2004, 49 (1-2) : 8 - 11
  • [8] Assessing ecological integrity in marine waters, using multiple indices and ecosystem components: Challenges for the future
    Borja, A.
    Ranasinghe, A.
    Weisberg, S. B.
    [J]. MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN, 2009, 59 (1-3) : 1 - 4
  • [9] Overview of integrative tools and methods in assessing ecological integrity in estuarine and coastal systems worldwide
    Borja, Angel
    Bricker, Suzanne B.
    Dauer, Daniel M.
    Demetriades, Nicolette T.
    Ferreira, Joao G.
    Forbes, Anthony T.
    Hutchings, Pat
    Jia, Xiaoping
    Kenchington, Richard
    Marques, Joao Carlos
    Zhu, Changbo
    [J]. MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN, 2008, 56 (09) : 1519 - 1537
  • [10] Grand challenges in marine ecosystems ecology
    Borja, Angel
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN MARINE SCIENCE, 2014, 1