A Randomized Controlled Trial of Pentazocine Versus Ondansetron for the Treatment of Intrathecal Morphine-Induced Pruritus in Patients Undergoing Cesarean Delivery

被引:26
作者
Tamdee, Decha [2 ]
Charuluxananan, Somrat [1 ]
Punjasawadwong, Yodying [3 ]
Tawichasri, Chamaiporn [2 ]
Patumanond, Jayanton [2 ]
Sriprajittichai, Pin [1 ]
机构
[1] Chulalongkorn Univ, Fac Med, Dept Anesthesiol, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
[2] Chiang Mai Univ, Fac Med, PhD Program Clin Epidemiol, Chiang Mai 50000, Thailand
[3] Chiang Mai Univ, Fac Med, Dept Anesthesiol, Chiang Mai 50000, Thailand
关键词
OPIOID RECEPTOR AGONIST; SPINAL-ANESTHESIA; PROPOFOL; NALBUPHINE; EFFICACY; PREVENTION; ANALGESIA; PLACEBO; MONKEYS;
D O I
10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181b72e93
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Ondansetron is effective for the treatment of intrathecal morphine-induced pruritus. There is evidence that kappa-opioid receptor agonists have antipruritic activity. Pentazocine is an agonist of kappa-opioid receptors and partial agonist at mu-opioid receptors. We therefore performed a randomized, double-blind trial to compare the efficacy of pentazocine and ondansetron for the treatment of pruritus associated with intrathecal injection of morphine in patients undergoing cesarean delivery. METHODS: Two hundred eight parturients who developed moderate to severe pruritus after the administration of intrathecal morphine were randomly allocated to 2 groups: IV pentazocine 15 mg (n = 104) and IV ondansetron 4 mg (n = 1.04). The successful treatment of pruritus (no or mild pruritus) and other adverse effects were determined 15 min after study drug administration, and patients were observed for recurrence of pruritus for 4 h. RESULTS: The treatment success rate at 15 min was higher in the pentazocine group (96.1%) than in the ondansetron group (80.8%) (95% confidence interval of difference: 7.0%, 23.8%; P = 0.001). The recurrence rate of moderate to severe pruritus within 4 h after treatment in the pentazocine group (12.0%) was lower than in the ondansetron group (32.1%) (P = 0.001). There were no significant differences between groups in nausea/vomiting, sedation, shivering, pain scores, and pain at injection site. No respiratory depression was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Pentazocine 15 mg is superior to ondansetron 4 mg for the treatment of intrathecal morphine-induced pruritus and has a lower recurrence rate. The side effects after treatment are mild. (Anesth Anaig 2009;109:1606-11)
引用
收藏
页码:1606 / 1611
页数:6
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] Ayoub C.M., 2004, Obstetric Anesthesia Principles and Practice, P472
  • [2] BAILEY PL, 1993, ANESTHESIOLOGY, V79, P49, DOI 10.1097/00000542-199307000-00010
  • [3] ITCHING AFTER EPIDURAL AND SPINAL OPIATES
    BALLANTYNE, JC
    LOACH, AB
    CARR, DB
    [J]. PAIN, 1988, 33 (02) : 149 - 160
  • [4] Effect of prophylactic 5-HT3 receptor antagonists on pruritus induced by neuraxial opioids: a quantitative systematic review
    Bonnet, M. -P.
    Marret, E.
    Josserand, J.
    Mercier, F. J.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2008, 101 (03) : 311 - 319
  • [5] SUBHYPNOTIC DOSES OF PROPOFOL RELIEVE PRURITUS INDUCED BY EPIDURAL AND INTRATHECAL MORPHINE
    BORGEAT, A
    WILDERSMITH, OHG
    SAIAH, M
    RIFAT, K
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1992, 76 (04) : 510 - 512
  • [6] PENTAZOCINE - REVIEW OF ITS PHARMACOLOGICAL PROPERTIES, THERAPEUTIC EFFICACY AND DEPENDENCE LIABILITY
    BROGDEN, RN
    SPEIGHT, TM
    AVERY, GS
    [J]. DRUGS, 1973, 5 (01) : 6 - 91
  • [7] BROMAGE PR, 1981, ANESTH ANALG, V60, P461
  • [8] BRAIN AND SPINAL-CORD METABOLIC-ACTIVITY DURING PROPOFOL ANESTHESIA
    CAVAZZUTI, M
    PORRO, CA
    BARBIERI, A
    GALETTI, A
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1991, 66 (04) : 490 - 495
  • [9] INTRATHECAL AND EPIDURAL MORPHINE-SULFATE FOR POSTCESAREAN ANALGESIA - A CLINICAL COMPARISON
    CHADWICK, HS
    READY, LB
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1988, 68 (06) : 925 - 929
  • [10] Nalbuphine versus ondansetron for prevention of intrathecal morphine-induced pruritus after cesarean delivery
    Charuluxananan, S
    Kyokong, O
    Somboonviboon, W
    Narasethakamol, A
    Promlok, P
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2003, 96 (06) : 1789 - 1793