E-Voting System Evaluation Based on The Council of Europe Recommendations: Helios Voting

被引:7
作者
Panizo Alonso, Luis [1 ]
Gasco, Mila [2 ,3 ]
Marcos del Blanco, David Y. [1 ]
Hermida Alonso, Jose A. [1 ]
Barrat, Jordi [4 ]
Alaiz Moreton, Hector [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leon, Engn Sch, Campus Vegazana, Leon 24193, Spain
[2] SUNY Albany, Rockefeller Coll Publ Affairs & Policy, Albany, NY 12222 USA
[3] SUNY Albany, Ctr Technol Govt, Albany, NY 12222 USA
[4] Univ Rovira & Virgili, Publ Law Dept, Av Catalunya 35, Tarragona 43002, Catalonia, Spain
关键词
Electronic voting; Law; Cryptography; Europe; E-democracy; e-government; e-voting;
D O I
10.1109/TETC.2018.2881891
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Despite the claimed benefits of e-voting initiatives, wider adoption of e-voting mechanisms and implementation processes is slower than expected. Several technical, social, and cultural challenges hinder generability and applicability of e-voting. Amongst them, the evaluation and harmonization of e-voting systems, given different legal and statutory frameworks, is still an important challenge to overcome. Yet, only a few works have addressed this topic in the field. This article aims to contribute to further understanding this unexplored topic by applying a practical evaluation framework to Helios Voting, one of the most widely used e-voting tools to date. Our framework, strongly based on the technical and security requirements issued by the Council of Europe in 2017, is a valuable source of information for election officials, researchers and voters to understand the strengths and weaknesses of Helios Voting and, as a result, to improve decision-making processes regarding the type and size of elections that can be securely handled by Helios Voting. The ultimate goal of our paper is to conceptually and practically support the gradual, secure and protocolized expansion of e-voting.
引用
收藏
页码:161 / 173
页数:13
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]  
Adida B., 2009, P EL VOT TECHN WORKS, P10
[2]  
Adida B., 2008, P 17 C SEC S USENIX, P335
[3]   Imperfect Forward Secrecy: How Diffie-Hellman Fails in Practice [J].
Adrian, David ;
Bhargavan, Karthikeyan ;
Durumeric, Zakir ;
Gaudry, Pierrick ;
Green, Matthew ;
Halderman, J. Alex ;
Heninger, Nadia ;
Springall, Drew ;
Thome, Emmanuel ;
Valenta, Luke ;
VanderSloot, Benjamin ;
Wustrow, Eric ;
Zanella-Beguelin, Santiago ;
Zimmermann, Paul .
CCS'15: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 22ND ACM SIGSAC CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER AND COMMUNICATIONS SECURITY, 2015, :5-17
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2015, USENIX Journal of Election Technology and Systems. JETS, P26
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2015, FREAK ATTACK
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2005, 20 INT C AUT DED CAD
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2017, ELECTORAL COMMISION
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2016, HELIOS SERVER GITHUB
[9]  
[Anonymous], HELIOS VOTING OFFICI
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2014, Christian Science Monitor