Patient-Assisted Compression in Screening Mammography: Patient Experience and Image Quality

被引:4
作者
Dontchos, Brian N. [1 ]
Edmonds, Christine E. [1 ]
Mercaldo, Sarah F. [1 ]
Miles, Randy C. [1 ]
Chu, Katrina F. [1 ]
Lehman, Constance D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Radiol, Boston, MA 02114 USA
关键词
mammography; image quality; compression; patient-assisted compression; patient experience;
D O I
10.1093/jbi/wbz024
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective: Screening mammography is critical to reduce breast cancer mortality, yet many women cite pain from compression as a reason they avoid this test. We evaluated patient experience and image quality in screening patients opting for a handheld patient-assisted compression (PAC) device. Methods: After institutional review board approval, women screened between February and July 2018 with a synthetic 2D/tomosynthesis mammography unit were offered use of a handheld PAC device. Patient experience through survey, image quality, compression thickness, compression force, and average glandular dose were evaluated and compared between women opting for PAC and women opting for technologist-controlled compression (TC). Multivariable ordinal logistic and linear regression models were estimated to control for age and breast density. In addition, for women opting for PAC, image quality obtained with their current PAC mammogram was compared with that obtained with their prior TC mammogram, by using Wilcoxon/Pearson tests. Results: Seventy-three percent of women preferred their mammogram experience with PAC compared with their prior mammogram without PAC. Women using PAC reported decreased anxiety compared with those using TC, after controlling for age and breast density (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.22 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.09-0.49]). There were no significant differences in image quality, compression thickness, or average glandular dose in exams for women using PAC compared with exams for women using TC. Women using PAC had significantly more compression force than women using TC had (P = 0.012). Conclusions: Mammography with PAC improves patient experience and results in similar image quality compared with mammography with TC.
引用
收藏
页码:192 / 198
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Icing Quality Improvement Methods to Improve Patient Experience [J].
Jensen, Jeff D. ;
Allen, Lisa ;
Blasko, Robert ;
Nagy, Paul .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2016, 13 (12) :1550-1554
[42]   Clinical Quality and Patient Experience in the Adult Ambulatory Setting [J].
Congiusta, Susan ;
Solomon, Philip ;
Conigliaro, Joseph ;
O'Gara-Shubinsky, Roseanne ;
Kohn, Nina ;
Nash, Ira S. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL QUALITY, 2019, 34 (01) :87-91
[43]   Progress in applying patient experience in nursing quality improvement [J].
ChengShuang Wang ;
MeiZhen Zhao ;
TieYing Zeng .
ChineseNursingResearch, 2017, 4 (01) :1-4
[44]   Improving the quality of patient experience through student engagement [J].
Liu, Cheuk H. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH-SYSTEM PHARMACY, 2018, 75 (03) :93-95
[45]   Effect of adding screening ultrasonography to screening mammography on patient recall and cancer detection rates: A retrospective study in Japan [J].
Tohno, Eriko ;
Umemoto, Takeshi ;
Sasaki, Kyoko ;
Morishima, Isamu ;
Ueno, Ei .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2013, 82 (08) :1227-1230
[46]   Evaluation of equipment performance, patient dose, imaging quality, and diagnostic coincidence in five Mexico City mammography services [J].
Brandan, ME ;
Ruiz-Trejo, C ;
Verdejo-Silva, M ;
Guevara, M ;
Lozano-Zalce, H ;
Madero-Preciado, L ;
Martín, J ;
Noel-Etienne, LM ;
Ramírez-Arias, JL ;
Soto, J ;
Villaseñor, Y .
ARCHIVES OF MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2004, 35 (01) :24-30
[47]   Quality of Life Measurements from the Patient Perspective: Capturing the Heterogeneity of the Patient Experience in a Standardised Way [J].
Matheson, David ;
Abdel-Aty, Hoda ;
O'Shea, Lorna .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2023, 9 (03) :425-426
[48]   The Effect of Patient Reminders on the Use of Screening Mammography in an Urban Health Department Primary Care Setting [J].
Michael S. Simon ;
Phyllis A. Gimotty ;
Anita Moncrease ;
Peter Dews ;
Robert C. Burack .
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2001, 65 :63-70
[49]   Mammography Clinical Image Quality and the False Positive Rate in a Canadian Breast Cancer Screening Program [J].
Guertin, Marie-Helene ;
Theberge, Sabelle ;
Zomahoun, Herve Tchala Vignon ;
Dufresne, Michel-Pierre ;
Pelletier, Eric ;
Brisson, Jacques .
CANADIAN ASSOCIATION OF RADIOLOGISTS JOURNAL-JOURNAL DE L ASSOCIATION CANADIENNE DES RADIOLOGISTES, 2018, 69 (02) :169-175
[50]   Mammography Screening: Gaps in Patient's and Physician's Needs for Shared Decision-Making [J].
DuBenske, Lori L. ;
Schrager, Sarina ;
McDowell, Helene ;
Wilke, Lee G. ;
Trentham-Dietz, Amy ;
Burnside, Elizabeth S. .
BREAST JOURNAL, 2017, 23 (02) :210-214