Patient-Assisted Compression in Screening Mammography: Patient Experience and Image Quality

被引:4
作者
Dontchos, Brian N. [1 ]
Edmonds, Christine E. [1 ]
Mercaldo, Sarah F. [1 ]
Miles, Randy C. [1 ]
Chu, Katrina F. [1 ]
Lehman, Constance D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Radiol, Boston, MA 02114 USA
关键词
mammography; image quality; compression; patient-assisted compression; patient experience;
D O I
10.1093/jbi/wbz024
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective: Screening mammography is critical to reduce breast cancer mortality, yet many women cite pain from compression as a reason they avoid this test. We evaluated patient experience and image quality in screening patients opting for a handheld patient-assisted compression (PAC) device. Methods: After institutional review board approval, women screened between February and July 2018 with a synthetic 2D/tomosynthesis mammography unit were offered use of a handheld PAC device. Patient experience through survey, image quality, compression thickness, compression force, and average glandular dose were evaluated and compared between women opting for PAC and women opting for technologist-controlled compression (TC). Multivariable ordinal logistic and linear regression models were estimated to control for age and breast density. In addition, for women opting for PAC, image quality obtained with their current PAC mammogram was compared with that obtained with their prior TC mammogram, by using Wilcoxon/Pearson tests. Results: Seventy-three percent of women preferred their mammogram experience with PAC compared with their prior mammogram without PAC. Women using PAC reported decreased anxiety compared with those using TC, after controlling for age and breast density (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.22 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.09-0.49]). There were no significant differences in image quality, compression thickness, or average glandular dose in exams for women using PAC compared with exams for women using TC. Women using PAC had significantly more compression force than women using TC had (P = 0.012). Conclusions: Mammography with PAC improves patient experience and results in similar image quality compared with mammography with TC.
引用
收藏
页码:192 / 198
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Patient satisfaction with screening mammography: Online vs off-line interpretation
    Wilson, TE
    Wallace, C
    Roubidoux, MA
    Sonnad, SS
    Crowe, DJ
    Helvie, MA
    [J]. ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 1998, 5 (11) : 771 - 778
  • [32] Association of patient experience and the quality of hospital care
    Abdalla, Rawia
    Pavlova, Milena
    Groot, Wim
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2023, 35 (03)
  • [33] Patient-centred care with self-compression mammography in clinical practice: a randomized trial compared to standard compression
    Iotti, Valentina
    Rossi, Paolo Giorgi
    Canovi, Laura
    Guberti, Monica
    Nitrosi, Andrea
    Lippolis, Davide Giosue
    Marchesi, Vanessa
    Besutti, Giulia
    Ottone, Marta
    Vacondio, Rita
    Pattacini, Pierpaolo
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2023, 33 (01) : 450 - 460
  • [34] Patient-centred care with self-compression mammography in clinical practice: a randomized trial compared to standard compression
    Valentina Iotti
    Paolo Giorgi Rossi
    Laura Canovi
    Monica Guberti
    Andrea Nitrosi
    Davide Giosuè Lippolis
    Vanessa Marchesi
    Giulia Besutti
    Marta Ottone
    Rita Vacondio
    Pierpaolo Pattacini
    [J]. European Radiology, 2023, 33 : 450 - 460
  • [35] Investigating the use of patient involvement and patient experience in quality improvement in Norway: rhetoric or reality?
    Siri Wiig
    Marianne Storm
    Karina Aase
    Martha Therese Gjestsen
    Marit Solheim
    Stig Harthug
    Glenn Robert
    Naomi Fulop
    [J]. BMC Health Services Research, 13
  • [36] Investigating the use of patient involvement and patient experience in quality improvement in Norway: rhetoric or reality?
    Wiig, Siri
    Storm, Marianne
    Aase, Karina
    Gjestsen, Martha Therese
    Solheim, Marit
    Harthug, Stig
    Robert, Glenn
    Fulop, Naomi
    [J]. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2013, 13
  • [37] Scatter Radiation Dose From Digital Screening Mammography Measured in a Representative Patient Population
    Mautz, Alan
    Budovec, Joseph J.
    Mulligan, Margaret
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2016, 206 (02) : 365 - 365
  • [38] Distribution of pressure on the breast in mammography using flexible and rigid compression plates: implications on patient handling
    Dustler, Magnus
    Fornvik, Daniel
    Timberg, Pontus
    Zackrisson, Sophia
    Muller, Serge
    [J]. ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2021, 62 (12) : 1583 - 1591
  • [39] Icing Quality Improvement Methods to Improve Patient Experience
    Jensen, Jeff D.
    Allen, Lisa
    Blasko, Robert
    Nagy, Paul
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2016, 13 (12) : 1550 - 1554
  • [40] Clinical Quality and Patient Experience in the Adult Ambulatory Setting
    Congiusta, Susan
    Solomon, Philip
    Conigliaro, Joseph
    O'Gara-Shubinsky, Roseanne
    Kohn, Nina
    Nash, Ira S.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL QUALITY, 2019, 34 (01) : 87 - 91