Patient-Assisted Compression in Screening Mammography: Patient Experience and Image Quality

被引:4
作者
Dontchos, Brian N. [1 ]
Edmonds, Christine E. [1 ]
Mercaldo, Sarah F. [1 ]
Miles, Randy C. [1 ]
Chu, Katrina F. [1 ]
Lehman, Constance D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Radiol, Boston, MA 02114 USA
关键词
mammography; image quality; compression; patient-assisted compression; patient experience;
D O I
10.1093/jbi/wbz024
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective: Screening mammography is critical to reduce breast cancer mortality, yet many women cite pain from compression as a reason they avoid this test. We evaluated patient experience and image quality in screening patients opting for a handheld patient-assisted compression (PAC) device. Methods: After institutional review board approval, women screened between February and July 2018 with a synthetic 2D/tomosynthesis mammography unit were offered use of a handheld PAC device. Patient experience through survey, image quality, compression thickness, compression force, and average glandular dose were evaluated and compared between women opting for PAC and women opting for technologist-controlled compression (TC). Multivariable ordinal logistic and linear regression models were estimated to control for age and breast density. In addition, for women opting for PAC, image quality obtained with their current PAC mammogram was compared with that obtained with their prior TC mammogram, by using Wilcoxon/Pearson tests. Results: Seventy-three percent of women preferred their mammogram experience with PAC compared with their prior mammogram without PAC. Women using PAC reported decreased anxiety compared with those using TC, after controlling for age and breast density (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.22 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.09-0.49]). There were no significant differences in image quality, compression thickness, or average glandular dose in exams for women using PAC compared with exams for women using TC. Women using PAC had significantly more compression force than women using TC had (P = 0.012). Conclusions: Mammography with PAC improves patient experience and results in similar image quality compared with mammography with TC.
引用
收藏
页码:192 / 198
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Image quality and compression force: the forgotten link in optimisation of digital mammography?
    O'Leary, D.
    Grant, T.
    Rainford, L.
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2011, 13
  • [22] Does an increase in compression force really improve visual image quality in mammography? - An initial investigation
    Mercer, C. E.
    Hogg, P.
    Cassidy, S.
    Denton, E. R. E.
    RADIOGRAPHY, 2013, 19 (04) : 363 - 365
  • [23] The case of the vanishing patient? Image and experience
    Blaxter, Mildred
    SOCIOLOGY OF HEALTH & ILLNESS, 2009, 31 (05) : 762 - 778
  • [24] Assessment of quality of experience (QoE) of image compression in social cloud computing
    Laghari, Asif Ali
    He, Hui
    Shafiq, Muhammad
    Khan, Asiya
    MULTIAGENT AND GRID SYSTEMS, 2018, 14 (02) : 125 - 143
  • [25] The effectiveness of mailed patient reminders on mammography screening: A meta-analysis
    Wagner, TH
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 1998, 14 (01) : 64 - 70
  • [26] Clinical Image Quality in Daily Practice of Breast Cancer Mammography Screening
    Guertin, Marie-Helene
    Theberge, Isabelle
    Dufresne, Michel-Pierre
    Zomahoun, Herve Tchala Vignon
    Major, Diane
    Tremblay, Richard
    Ricard, Carmen
    Shumak, Rene
    Wadden, Nancy
    Pelletier, Eric
    Brisson, Jacques
    CANADIAN ASSOCIATION OF RADIOLOGISTS JOURNAL-JOURNAL DE L ASSOCIATION CANADIENNE DES RADIOLOGISTES, 2014, 65 (03): : 199 - 206
  • [27] Image quality of mammography in Croatian nationwide screening program: Comparison between various types of facilities
    Brnic, Zoran
    Blaskovic, Darko
    Klasic, Branimir
    Ramac, Jelena Popic
    Flegaric-Bradic, Mirjana
    Stimac, Damir
    Lubin, Ivan Zvonimir
    Brnic, Vedran
    Faj, Dario
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2012, 81 (04) : E478 - E485
  • [28] The three pillars of patient experience: identifying key drivers of patient experience to improve quality in healthcare
    Adams, Corey
    Walpola, Ramesh
    Iqbal, Maha Pervaz
    Schembri, Anthony
    Harrison, Reema
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH-HEIDELBERG, 2024,
  • [29] Potentially missed detection with screening mammography: does the quality of radiologist's interpretation vary by patient socioeconomic advantage/disadvantage?
    Rauscher, Garth H.
    Khan, Jenna A.
    Berbaurri, Michael L.
    Conant, Emily F.
    ANNALS OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2013, 23 (04) : 210 - 214
  • [30] Patient satisfaction with screening mammography: Online vs off-line interpretation
    Wilson, TE
    Wallace, C
    Roubidoux, MA
    Sonnad, SS
    Crowe, DJ
    Helvie, MA
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 1998, 5 (11) : 771 - 778